Attorneys and protest organizers advised demonstrators take these safety precautions. Study the protest route, and organize transportation to and from the event. Stick with a group and set a meet-up location if you get separated. Pack essential supplies for the day in a suitable bag. Water, snacks, ID, medications and cash should be readily available. Wear non-distinctive clothing to avoid being easily identified.
Don’t bring anything you wouldn’t want on you if you were arrested. Consider surveillance precautions and how you want to safeguard your identity. Leaving your phone at home is the best way to protect privacy and prevent surveillance tracking. If you need to bring your device, keep it powered off throughout the protest. Disable biometric features like FaceID to prevent law enforcement from accessing your device.
Protesters retain the right to protest in public areas but need to avoid invading private property. Extra precautions should be taken around government facilities and protesters should pay attention to warnings from law enforcement officers or government officials.
Last night I scrolled through TikTok and came across several videos offering the advice seen above. But I also noticed that a lot of comments were defiant, with many saying that they don’t care if they are recognized or tracked or doxxed by the cult.
The Axios piece goes on to provide medical advice if you are exposed to tear gas or pepper spray and how to behave if accosted by or detained by police. The ACLU and other civil rights groups will have legal observers at protests in large cities. Hit the link.
A New York county’s law banning transgender women from playing on female sports teams at county-run parks and recreational facilities has been halted for now.
A state appeals court on Wednesday barred Nassau County from enforcing the ban while a legal challenge brought on behalf of a local women’s roller derby league plays out.
The decision comes after a lower court judge upheld the local law Monday, and the New York Civil Liberties Union, which had sued on the roller derby league’s behalf, vowed to challenge the ruling.
Judge R. Bruce Cozzens had ruled the county ban was “narrowly tailored” and “does not categorically exclude transgender individuals from athletic participation” as they can still play in coed sports leagues.
But the state appellate division, in its decision, said that making the women’s roller derby league become coed would “change the identity of the league,” jeopardizing not just its status with the sport’s governing body but also its ability to grow its membership and find teams to compete against.
Amanda “Curly Fry” Urena, president of the Long Island Roller Rebels, said players were “thrilled” the higher court saw through Nassau County’s “transphobic and cruel ban.”
Gabriella Larios, an attorney with the NYCLU, said the ruling “made it crystal clear that any attempt to ban trans women and girls from sports is prohibited by our state’s anti-discrimination laws.”
Gabriella Larios, staff attorney for the New York Civil Liberties Union, at United Skates of America.Jeenah Moon / AP file
Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman had proposed the ban as a way to protect girls and women from getting injured while competing against transgender women. It would have affected more than 100 sports facilities in the county on Long Island next to New York City.
The Republican, in an emailed statement, said the county will “continue to protect the integrity and safety of women’s sports.” A spokesperson didn’t immediately respond to follow-up questions about whether it would comply with the judge’s order.
Blakeman first imposed the ban through an executive order, but it was struck down after a lawsuit from the roller derby league and the NYCLU. The county’s Republican-controlled Legislature then passed a law containing the ban, setting off another round of litigation.
Texas Gov Greg Abbott has joined the effort to blot out rainbow crosswalks on public streets.
That means the Lone Star State will follow the lead of Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy and states including Florida, which has continued to erase all street art in the name of erasing “political ideologies” from the roadways.
The Texas Department of Transportation sent a memo to local governments announcing it would adhere to Duffy’s direction to keep crosswalks “free from distractions.” That means Texas won’t allow any public art, political messaging, or any other nonstandard markings.
“Pavement markings such as decorative crosswalks, murals, or markings conveying artwork or other messages are prohibited on travel lanes, shoulders, intersections, and crosswalks unless they serve a direct traffic control or safety function. This prohibition includes the use of symbols, flags, or other markings conveying any message or communications,” reads a memo published by San Antonio’s NBC affiliate.
Now government officials in cities such as Dallas, Houston ,and San Antonio have 30 days to paint over the rainbow decorations in crosswalks or risk losing state funding, according to Texas Public Radio.
“None of this is in the name of public safety,” James Poindexter of Pride San Antonio told his local NBC station. “It’s all in the name of political stunt.”
Meanwhile, Florida continues to impose its anti-color agenda. Department of Transportation officials in the Sunshine State this week removed an iconic rainbow crosswalk from Ocean Drive in Miami Beach, as reported by an NBC affiliate in South Florida.
“All of a sudden all these [Florida Department of Transportation] trucks showed up, an army of workers, heavy machinery. No notice to our city,” Miami Beach City Commissioner Alex Fernandez told the station.
Gov. Ron DeSantis has pushed for the removal of all public street art in the state to satisfy Duffy’s fight against rainbow crosswalks. He started with an unannounced paint-over of a rainbow crosswalk in front of the Pulse nightclub in Orlando that was created to honor victims of the 2016 mass shooting at the gay club.
“We’re not doing the commandeering of the roads to put up messaging,” DeSantis said in August to defend the attack on art, Pride, and any honoring of murder victims.
Notably, there is no evidence that street art in crosswalks causes more accidents. In fact, a 2022 Bloomberg study found decorated crosswalks see a 50 percenr drop in collisions.
A prominent anti-DEI campaigner appointed by Meta in August as an adviser on AI bias has spent the weeks since his appointment spreading disinformation about shootings, transgender people, vaccines, crime, and protests. Robby Starbuck, 36, of Nashville, was appointed in August as an adviser by Meta – owner of Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and other tech platforms – in an August lawsuit settlement.
Since his appointment, Starbuck has baselessly claimed that individual shooters in the US were motivated by leftist ideology, described faith-based protest groups as communists, and without evidence tied Democratic lawmakers to murders.
Starbuck has long pushed vaccine disinformation, and he has amplified false claims made by health secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr. As part of his anti-DEI push, Starbuck has also spread overheated claims and falsehoods about transgender and LGBTQ people. Starbuck also baselessly asserted that city officials in Portland were working with anti-fascists, and appeared to urge a violent response.
Read the full article. Starbuck has appeared here many times for leading boycotts and threat campaigns against major corporations for their pro-LGBTQ policies. In most cases, the targeted companies rolled back such policies or ended them entirely. Hit the link for much more. No paywall.
New York City Councilman Erik Bottcher filed Wednesday to run for the seat of retiring Congressman Jerry Nadler, and he raised nearly $700,000 in campaign funds in his first 24 hours.
This historic, grassroots-driven achievement marks the biggest first-day total in New York State history and one of the biggest nationwide, according to his campaign.
Bottcher, a 46-year-old gay man, is one of the city’s most visible LGBTQ+ officials and a rising star in Democratic politics.
In a letter to supporters on Wednesday and during an interview with The Advocate, Bottcher said Nadler’s decision not to seek reelection “creates an incredible opportunity for a new generation of leaders to step forward — and for our community to make history.”
“This congressional district has a proud tradition of representatives who’ve fought for LGBTQ+ rights, from Bella Abzug to Jerry Nadler,” Bottcher said. “But we’ve never actually had one of our own at the table. And there’s an old saying, ‘If you’re not at the table, you’re on the menu.’ Our community is under attack in terrifying ways, and it’s time to take the gloves off.”
The 12th Congressional District is among the nation’s most politically active and socially progressive areas. From the earliest AIDS marches to the fight for marriage equality, the district’s neighborhoods have long been at the center of LGBTQ+ advocacy and cultural change.
Bottcher, who represents Manhattan’s Third City Council District (encompassing Chelsea, Hell’s Kitchen, and the West Village), said his motivation to explore a congressional run comes from both urgency and hope.
“I love my country, and right now it’s being torn apart by Donald Trump and his neo-fascist forces,” he said. “This is the moment for all Americans, especially those of us in public service, to stand up and fight back. I’ve spent my life serving my community, and serving in Congress would be one of the highest honors imaginable.”
If Bottcher officially enters the race, he’ll be joining what’s shaping up to be a highly competitive Democratic primary. Manhattan Assemblymember Micah Lasher has already declared his candidacy, while many others are considering a run in the coming weeks as one of New York’s most coveted congressional seats opens up for the first time in decades.
Bottcher candidacy would be historic. If elected, he would become the first out gay member of Congress from Manhattan and only the third from New York City, following Ritchie Torres of the Bronx and former Republican congressman and convicted felon George Santos,. Two other out gay lawmakers from NYC suburbs served previously, Sean Patrick Maloney and Mondaire Jones.
Before joining the City Council, Bottcher served as chief of staff to then-Council Speaker Corey Johnson and as an aide to state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal, both gay trailblazers in New York politics.
Over more than a decade, Bottcher has earned a reputation as a hands-on operator and coalition builder who pairs policy substance with visible, on-the-ground presence.
“I’m out in the community day and night, every day of the week,” he said. “People want real representation. They want to know and feel connected to the people who speak for them. That’s been at the heart of my work in City Council District 3, and it’s exactly what I’d bring to the 12th District if I run.”
In City Hall, Bottcher has built a profile as an advocate for tenants’ rights, small-business recovery, mental health services, and public safety. His office has become known for quick responses to neighborhood concerns, from sanitation issues to housing safety.
Nadler’s retirement marks the end of an era. Known as one of Congress’s leading liberal voices, he served as a key defender of democracy and civil rights during both Trump impeachments and was a major supporter of LGBTQ+ rights.
His departure leaves behind a legacy rooted in advocacy and coalition building that shaped the modern identity of Manhattan’s left.
Still, Bottcher’s allies believe his blend of local experience, grassroots sensibility, and generational appeal set him apart. “No one can deny that Erik has been a rock star on the City Council, delivering for his constituents time and time again on issues like affordable housing, mental health, LGBTQ safety, and more,” said Jeff Larivee, executive director of Equality PAC. “NY-12 is one of the most dynamic and proudly LGBTQ+ districts in the country, and Erik represents the next generation of leadership this community deserves. This will be a huge priority race for Equality PAC — and we will do everything we can to support Erik and make sure he wins.”
“This is about service,” Bottcher said in closing. “It’s about standing up when your country and your community need you most. And right now both are on the line.”
The Harlem Renaissance was one of the most important artistic and cultural milestones in modern history, and a sweeping new exhibit at The New York Historical highlights how this era was — as Henry Louis Gates Jr. once put it — “surely as gay as it was Black.”
“In school, we tend to learn that the Harlem Renaissance was focused on race and class, and the things that they’re producing, but in fact, sexuality and gender are just as important,” Robinson told NBC News.
The Harlem Renaissance was marked by an explosion of Black creativity, identity and intellectual life centered in New York City’s Harlem neighborhood during the 1920s and early 1930s, though Robinson noted that historians debate exactly when it ended.
The era, Robinson said, gave Black artists “an opportunity to express themselves in ways that had not been done before,” adding that “Black queer creatives are really a driving force” during this period, even amid racism and homophobia.
A Paramount Records advertisement for Ma Rainey’s “Prove It on Me Blues” that appeared in the Chicago Defender newspaper in 1928.Queer Music Heritage / JD Doyle Archives
“The Gay Harlem Renaissance” — which features more than 200 items including paintings, sculptures, photographs and books — opened Friday and will remain on view until March. George Chauncey, a professor of history at Columbia University and the author of the seminal LGBTQ history book “Gay New York, 1890-1940,” served as the show’s chief historian.
Exploring Harlem’s art
The multiroom exhibition takes visitors through the Great Migration of Black Southerners in the early 20th century; introduces them to the groundbreaking works of writers like Alain Locke, Langston Hughes and Bruce Nugent; leads them through the speakeasies, rent parties, drag balls and salons of the interwar years; explores the soulful blues music of entertainers like Ma Rainey, Ethel Waters and Bessie Smith; and examines the lasting legacy of the work produced during this rich cultural era.
This 1934 painting by Earle Richardson, titled “Employment of the Negro in Agriculture,” honors the resilience of Black sharecroppers laboring under oppressive conditions.Earle Richardson / Howard University Gallery of Art
Locke, considered the “dean” of the Harlem Renaissance, edited and published “The New Negro” in 1925, a seminal anthology for the movement. Locke, who was gay but not out, mentored many of the poets, novelists and artists who defined the era, such as Countee Cullen, Hughes and Nugent.
Robinson said Nugent stood out in Black art at the time for openly embracing and celebrating beauty — a theme captured in his 1926 stream-of-consciousness poem “Smoke, Lilies and Jade,” published in the short-lived magazine “Fire!!” The piece reflected his attraction to both men and women.
Though “Fire!!” only published one issue, it was one of several magazines featured in the exhibit that helped ideas about freedom, sexuality and identity reach beyond Harlem.
Through a selection of books, magazines and newspapers, the exhibition’s curators show how Black publications experienced tremendous growth in readership, circulation and influence during the interwar years.Brooke Sopelsa / NBC News
Drag, nightlife and defiance
Drag was a popular art form during the era, and Harlem’s annual Hamilton Lodge Ball was the largest and most famous drag ball on the East Coast.
“By the time you hit the 1920s and ’30s, attendees numbered in the thousands, and they’re coming from up and down the East Coast and as far as Europe to come see the participants perform,” Robinson said.
The event became so legendary, Robinson said, that it was covered in newspapers around the world and was even written about by Langston Hughes in his 1940 autobiography, “The Big Sea.”
A re-creation of the prize-winning gown worn by Bonnie Clark at the 1932 Hamilton Lodge Ball. Curator Allison Robinson said it was important to include because Clark was one of the few Black drag queens to be crowned at the ball.Brooke Sopelsa / NBC News
Nightclubs and speakeasies were also central to Harlem’s social life. The exhibit pays homage to these venues with a large re-creation of a Harlem nightlife map, highlighting popular spots that catered to gay and straight patrons and drew crowds from across New York City.
One such venue was Gladys’ Clam House, home of arguably the era’s most famous gender-bending performer: Gladys Bentley. The nightclub was initially named Harry Hansberry’s Clam House, but Robinson said the owner eventually renamed it for the tuxedo-clad performer because she’s “why people were going.”
Bentley got her start at rent parties in private homes before breaking into the Harlem nightclub scene when the Mad House was looking for a male performer. She offered to perform in a top hat and a tuxedo coat, a look that became “her signature for the rest of her career,” Robinson said.
But her masculine style wasn’t just for the stage.
“This is part of her life,” Robinson emphasized. “She’s walking up and down Seventh Avenue with a woman on her arm, dressed in a tuxedo and a top hat.”
Gladys Bentley, pictured here circa 1940, “embraced her sexuality and her gender in ways that are so cutting edge and so intrinsic to how we understand the Harlem Renaissance,” lead curator Allison Robinson said.Collection of the Smithsonian, National Museum of African American History and Culture
Rent parties, the type of events where Bentley got her start, were popular in Harlem at the time.
“Rent in Harlem was astronomical,” Robinson explained. “Landlords took advantage of the fact that there were limited places where Black people could live to charge them extremely high rent, but individuals threw parties to help cover the cost.”
For a small fee, guests at these Prohibition-era parties could enjoy illegal drinks as well as music and dancing, Robinson explained. It was a way for Harlem residents, gay and straight alike, to socialize and help cover the high cost of rent.
Thirteen rent party invitations are displayed, all but one coming from Langston Hughes. The other, for a “Sunday matinee,” came from Lillian Foster, who gave it to a dancer named Mabel Hampton after the two struck up a conversation at a bus stop. The women became romantic partners for more than four decades, and Hampton kept the invitation for the rest of her life.
This rent party invitation from 1932 was saved by dancer and longtime LGBTQ advocate Mabel Hampton until her death in 1989.Mabel Hampton Collection, Lesbian Herstory Archives
The Harlem home of arts patron and LGBTQ ally A’Lelia Walker was not just a place for revelry but also for the convergence of ideas and collaborations.
The only child of entrepreneur Madam C.J. Walker,A’Lelia held salons and parties bringing hundreds of people together to her apartment and later a grand townhouse on 136th Street, known as the Dark Tower. Her parties became safe havens for Harlem’s queer community, with Hughes calling her the “joy goddess of Harlem’s 1920’s.” Correspondence and one of Walker’s stylish coats from her salon era are included in the exhibit.
The elaborate coat of salon host and arts patron A’Lelia Walker on display along with Countee Cullen’s poem “From the Dark Tower” and a photo of Walker’s three-story Harlem townhouse.Brooke Sopelsa / NBC News
The artifacts celebrating the Harlem Renaissance’s LGBTQ legacy tell a story that is still unfolding, Robinson said. “The end is not an end, but a display of what came after,” she said.
Robinson said she hopes visitors“appreciate what amazing creative energy is coming out of the Black LGBTQ community in the ’20s and ’30s”; that they understand that sexuality and gender are important “topics that are being investigated in the Harlem Renaissance”; and they “realize that even as the figures here were facing a lot of obstacles, they’re producing things that are beautiful and moving and important.”
A couple in Massachusetts has lost their license to foster after refusing to sign a policy agreeing not to discriminate against LGBTQ+ youth nor attempt to change their gender identity or sexual orientation.
The state’s Department of Children and Families (DCF) revoked the license of Lydia and Heath Marvin in April after they refused to sign the nondiscrimination policy that would protect youth in their care. The couple, who has three biological children in their teens, had fostered eight children under the age of four since 2020.
“We will absolutely love and support and care for any child in our home but we simply can’t agree to go against our Christian faith in this area,” Lydia recently told CBS Boston.
Over 30 percent of youth in foster care identify as LGBTQ+ and five percent as transgender, according to a 2019 study from Children’s Rights, compared to 11.2 percent and 1.17 percent of youth not in foster care.
The DCF policy requires that “employees, foster parents, interns, volunteers, and others who interact with children and families must be respectful of how individuals ask to be identified and use the terms an individual uses to describe themselves.” This includes allowing foster youth to use restrooms or changing facilities that align with their gender identity, allowing them to dress in clothing or style their hair in ways that align with their gender identity, and allowing them to use their names and pronouns.
The policy also explicitly mandates that “foster parents and contracted service providers do not make attempts to convince LGBTQIA+ children/youth to reject or modify their sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.” This includes not contracting with “faith leaders who attempt to change a child/youth’s sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.”
The department also supports youth seeking legal name and gender changes, as well as “medical care and mental health services for children/youth provided in a manner that is culturally responsive and affirming,” though none are required for their gender identity to be respected.
The Marvins said that they are exploring their legal options, as a lawsuit from other prospective foster parents who refused to sign the nondiscrimination policy moves forward. The parents are represented by the so-called Alliance Defending Freedom, a group dubbed a “Christian legal army” by its founder, which has a long history of opposing civil rights protections for LGBTQ+ people and has been dubbed as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.
The group, which believes the “homosexual agenda” will destroy society, has played a pivotal role in several cases involving abortion access and LGBTQ+ rights, including the Supreme Court case Dobbs v. Jackson’s Women’s Health Organization, which overturned the right to an abortion nationally, as well as Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado and 303 Creative, Inc. v. Elenis, which validated discrimination against LGBTQ+ customers on the basis of religious views.
“The state has an obligation to children to make sure that they’re safe and well protected,” Polly Crozier, Director of Family Advocacy at GLBTQ Legal Advocates and Defenders, told the CBS. “And foster parents, they’re not parents. Foster parents are temporary. They’re a stop gap to make sure children can safely go back to their families of origin.”
LGBTQ+ refugees may face outing in their home countries before being dragged through an archaic asylum system that forces them to ‘prove’ their identities to complete strangers, case studies from a refugee charity shared for National Coming Out Day show.
National Coming Out Day takes place every year on 11 October and was first celebrated in 1988, with the date marking the one year anniversary of the the National March on Washington for Lesbian and Gay Rights. It was created to honour LGBTQ+ people who decided to come out and live their lives openly as queer people.
Coming out is a deeply personal and individual experience for LGBTQ+ folks and people can ‘come out’ at any age.
For some, it won’t be a big deal at all and might something they do off-hand or causally – such as explaining what their identity is or introducing their partner to friends or family – but for others it can be very challenging, especially if they come from communities where anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination is commonplace.
For LGBTQ+ refugees, the coming out process can be a dangerous and upsetting one, with queer people facing rejection from family and friends, abuse, criminal charges or even the death penalty.
For National Coming Out Day 2025, PinkNews heard case studies from two people who are supported by LGBTQ+ refugee charity Rainbow Migration about their experiences with coming out.
Jalal, a gay man from Morocco, explained he lived his whole life there until he moved to the UK at the start of 2021 to undertake a higher degree.
“You’ll have to leave or he’s going to kill you”
“In one of my visits home, I had a huge confrontation with my family,” he explained. “I brought a lot of clothes and other items, knowing my family normally would not touch any of my stuff, like my phone.
“But this time, I was really surprised when my mum took the opportunity to go through my stuff when I wasn’t looking.
You may like to watch
“Thinking back on it, I think she was very suspicious about my lifestyle in the UK. Every time we video called, I would keep it short and always say the same things, so she wanted to know more.
“She found my letters and a picture of me and my ex.
“When I got back, she was holding all the things I was hiding, and we had a fight.
“I had to go back to my room for safety because it was getting really violent. Eventually my parents told me to leave, or my dad was going to kill me. ”
Jalal explain his father “left the house to cool off” and his mum told him: “Once he’s back, you’ll have to leave or he’s going to kill you.”
“So that’s what I did. I took my passport, my luggage and anything that I could grab.
“I went to stay in the cheapest hotel, waiting for the cheapest flight ticket [back to London]. Eventually, I took the flight. I needed three days before I applied for asylum to just process everything. I was so tired from the flight.”
Once queer people reach the UK, the system can itself be discriminatory in the way it asks LGBTQ+ folks to ‘prove’ their identities to officials through evidence in order to be granted asylum.
As research from Rainbow Migration has previously shown, the UK governmentfrequently does not believe LGBTQ+ people seeking asylum and disregards testimony from friends and family which attests to an individual’s sexual or gender identity.
A bisexual woman from Pakistan who receives support from Rainbow Migration said of the system: “In my main interview, I had to talk about parts of my life I had buried deep.
“I had to explain trauma, abuse, and fear to strangers — and try to stay composed, because I knew they were watching closely to see if I was “credible enough.”
When the U.S. Supreme Court commences proceedings Tuesday to hear oral arguments over whether a Colorado therapist can offer “conversion therapy” to queer youth, the stakes are far greater than one state’s law.
Chiles v. Salazar, a challenge to Colorado’s ban on ‘conversion therapy for minors, is about whether the highest court in the land will once again choose bigotry over humanity and call it constitutional.
And it will likely do it based on a lie. The Alliance Defending Freedom, which is defending conversion therapy in the case, is accused of misquoting and misrepresenting a 2016 study by scholars Lisa Diamond and Clifford Rosky.
In light of all this, I’m not sure why the court is wasting its time listening to oral arguments when the result will be a foregone conclusion. This is all a dog and pony show, a sham, by the six conservative justices to somehow show that they can remain “unbiased,” which is a joke with tragic consequences.
Conversion therapy is not in any way therapy. It is psychological torture masquerading as religion, marketed as “healing,” and has historically been inflicted on queer people under the guise of saving their souls. It sure as hell doesn’t save them — it destroys them.
It was born in the 19th century from the same pseudoscientific junk that justified lobotomies and “hysteria” diagnoses. Doctors prescribed hypnosis, electroshock, even chemical castration to “cure” homosexuality. They failed, of course, not because they lacked technique, but because there was never anything to cure.
By the late 20th century, the medical community condemned conversion therapy as quackery and abuse. Virtually every medical group in the country is opposed to conversion therapy.
But members of the sanctimonious religious right keep shoving it down victims’ throats. In their warped logic, with the cross as their shield, they call it “free speech.” And Tuesday, before a Supreme Court dominated by Christian fundamentalists, that twisted argument will get its day.
I can see Justices Alito, Barrett, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Roberts, and Thomas behind the curtain snickering and salivating at their chance to trash opponents of conversion therapy, who will likely point out the life-threatening danger of this so-called free speech.
This case really asks whether a therapist should be allowed to inflict emotional and psychological trauma on LGBTQ+ youth in the name of religion. Under this court, the answer will almost certainly be yes. Unambiguously yes. Glory hallelujah yes.
This pseudo court functions less as a judicial branc, and more like Donald Trump’s black-robed bullies and rubber stampers. Case after case, the 6–3 majority has given Trump everything he’s wanted: immunity shields, deregulation, trampling voting rights, and weaponizing government agencies.
This court doesn’t interpret the Constitution. That’s another one of its repeated lies. It sees its mission as enforcing a cultural and religious crusade while making Trump emperor and king.
And LGBTQ+ Americans have been in its crosshairs from day one. And we will continue to be through this upcoming term. While the court paves the way for Trump to become a dictator, it will piously try to tear down rights and precedent.
This court has consistently ruled against LGBTQ+ plaintiffs, framing discrimination as “religious freedom.” It said states can ban gender-affirming care for youth and sided with business owners who claim their “faith” allows them to deny service to queer customers.
Justices Thomas and Alito have openly telegraphed their desire to revisit, read overturn, Obergefell v. Hodges, the 2015 decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide. They’ve described it as a “mistake,” a “threat to religious liberty,” and a decision that “should be corrected.” Corrected, in their eyes, means erased, done away with, put in the dustbin of history.
And that’s the ideological platform on which Tuesday’s case will be decided. It’s not about the law. It’s not about science. And it’s most certainly not about human decency. It’s about the court’s divine entitlement and the belief that Christian conservatives are owed special protection to impose their beliefs on others.
Enter Kaly Chiles, the therapist at the center of the conversion therapy case, who wants to impose her beliefs and her destructive logic on impressionable queer youth.
It’s grotesque. Immoral. And it’s dangerous.
Ask Andrew Hartzler, president of the Missouri Young Democrats and a survivor of conversion therapy. At 14, after he came out to his parents, they sent him to a so-called counselor in Kansas City three times a week.
He says the sessions “put me in a suffocating box” where he was taught that every thought or feeling he had about another boy was a sign of sin. “If I was walking down the street and noticed a guy who caught my eye,” he recalled, “I was told it meant I wasn’t praying enough or reading the Bible enough.”
A former library director in Wyoming has won $700,000 in a settlement after she was fired for refusing to remove books containing content about sexual health and LGBTQ+ identities.
Terri Lesley, director of Campbell County Public Library, was removed from her position in July, 2023 after 27 years of service when the Campbell County library board voted four to one to fire her. The board had pushed for two years to convince Lesley to remove the collection of books, which some had claimed were inappropriate for minors.
Under the settlement, Lesley has agreed to drop her lawsuit against the state, though a separate lawsuit she has filed against the three individuals who challenged the books will move foward.
“I do feel vindicated. It’s been a rough road, but I will never regret standing up for the First Amendment,” Lesley said, via The Associated Press.
Some of the books Lesley refused to remove included Gender Queer by Maia Kobabe, Lawn Boy by Jonathan Evison, This Book is Gay by Juno Dawson, How Do You Make a Baby by Anna Fiske, Doing It by Hannah Witton, Sex is a Funny Word by Corey Silverberg, and Dating and Sex: A Guide for the 21st Century Teen Boy by Andrew P. Smiler.
Lesley’s firing came not long after the library board voted in October, 2022 to leave the American Library Association, a group that promotes libraries, and the Wyoming Library Association, its state chapter.
Books bans were at a record high two years ago when Lesley was fired — a record that has since been broken. During the 2024-2025 school year, PEN America recorded 6,870 instances of book bans across 23 states and 87 public school districts, affecting 3,752 titles. They represented the work of 2,308 authors, 243 illustrators, and 38 translators.
“We hope at least that it sends a message to other library districts, other states, other counties, that the First Amendment is alive and strong and that our values against discrimination also remain alive and strong,” said Lesley’s attorney, Iris Halpern. “These are public entities, they’re government officials, they need to keep in mind their constitutional obligations.”
