About Gary Carnivele

Posts by Gary Carnivele:

/ /

Lesbian Couple Rejected Retirement Home Win Justice

A married lesbian couple have won a lengthy legal battle against a retirement community that refused them housing due to the owners’ religious beliefs.

Mary Walsh, 72, and Beverly Nance, 68, have been together for 40 years and married for 10. In 2016 they applied to move to the Friendship Village senior living facility in St. Louis, where they hoped to spend their last years surrounded by friends with help on hand if they needed.

But once Friendship Village staff learned they were married they refused them, saying the home did not condone homosexuality. The letter they received said that the only married couples they accepted were those in unions between “one man and one woman”.

This blindsided the couple, who had already paid the $2,000 deposit under the assumption that their relationship was not an issue. They’d chosen Friendship Village for financial reasons, as the community offered care options they would need that weren’t available elsewhere without substantially extra costs.

Walsh and Beverly sued Friendship Village alleging housing discrimination, only to have their case dismissed last year when a judge found that the centre had indeed discriminated against them, but that it wasn’t illegal.

But the couple refused to back down, and their case was reinstated in July following the recent Bostock v. Clayton County ruling that determined sexual orientation was protected under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Walsh and Nance finally got their hard-won victory on Tuesday (8 December), after reaching a confidential settlement with the home.

“This has been a harrowing experience and one that I hope no other same-sex couple has to face,” Walsh said after the ruling was announced. “Bev and I are relieved that this case is now behind us and that we have closure after our lives were thrown into chaos.”

Their focus now is only “on their health and each other,” and trying to stay safe during the coronavirus pandemic.

/ /

Women Athletes Undergoing Invasive Medical Procedures without Consent

,

After training for hours on end, year after year, some women athletes – particularly those competing on the world stage – are getting their careers and successes ripped away because of “sex testing,” practices, which are invasive and medically unnecessary procedures based on disputed science that dictates what “natural” testosterone levels can be for women, and the role it plays in performance. Women from the global south are disproportionately targeted. Sporting officials demand that these women undergo irreversible sterilization surgeries or hormone therapies to have a chance at competing again. Philippa Stewart spoke to Dr. Payoshni Mitra, who has worked for years with affected athletes, about a new Human Rights Watch report, “‘They’re Chasing Us Away from Sport’” and why these tests have to end.

What is it that singles women out?

Often it is just that they look different, less “feminine” than men, and it often is men, in charge of the national or international sports federations, who think they should.

These policies disproportionately target women from the global south, specifically black and brown women. It is important to note that there aren’t any similar rules governing men’s bodies.

There is evidence of research studies by doctors affiliated to the World Athletics where women’s bodies have been investigated and operated on. They treated these women like guinea pigs. They would not have done this to an athlete from Europe or America.
 

Do the athletes give consent to be tested?

Not informed consent. They are normally not told exactly why they are being tested or what is going to happen. In the case of one athlete, she was told it was about high performance, others are told various things that aren’t true.

202012sex_testing_athletes_cover

December 4, 2020

“They’re Chasing Us Away from Sport”

Human Rights Violations in Sex Testing of Elite Women Athletes

There is also no privacy, the coach is there when the physical exams are done. Then the women are pressured into surgery or hormone therapy as the only ways they could possibly be allowed to compete in their preferred event.

Often these women start competing because the prizes are a way to survive, to pull their family out of poverty. They love sports and see it as the thing that can change the fate of their family. And then suddenly they are told they don’t have a chance unless they take irreversible medical steps.

They are also told not to talk about it and to come up with some excuse about why they are not competing. This creates a feeling of shame for them, like there’s something wrong with them and they shouldn’t talk about it. It makes them feel inadequate, like they’re not the “correct” kind of woman. Athletes told me it feels like a way of telling them they aren’t good enough.
 

Are doctors willing to perform these tests without consent?

This isn’t a normal doctor-patient relationship. The athletic federations that are directly connected to the doctors are both requesting the invasive treatment and being given information by the doctors about the athletes. The athletes don’t have any autonomy around this process. Their medical information is passed on from the doctor to the athletic federation that decides their future and whether they will be allowed to compete.

Some people believe that if a woman doctor performs the test then it is fine. But it isn’t necessarily so. It is still an extra pair of eyes and hands on your body in a way you haven’t consented to. That is not fine.

The women are told not to speak about it because of “confidentiality,” but this protects the federations and the people performing the tests and not usually the athletes.
 

The World Medical Association has said these tests shouldn’t be performed. Has that made a difference?

Honestly, no. The WMA made it clear that the sex testing regulations are unethical and instructed doctors not to implement them. But the doctors are not controlled by medical authorities, they do what their collaborators – the athletic federations – tell them to do, and they follow what the international bodies say. There needs to be a change in sporting policy at the international level for these harmful practices to stop.
 

What happens after women are told they can’t compete?

Often these women start competing because of the prizes. Sometimes the prize is some food, and one woman told me she won a cow as a young girl, which meant her family could have milk every day. Sport, competing for the national team, it’s something to aim for because it pulls you out of poverty, it helps your family. Athletes in many countries get lifetime government jobs after they finish competing if they did well and brought pride to their country.

These policies disproportionately target women from the global south, specifically black and brown women. Dr. Payoshni Mitra

When that goes away, often the woman’s family stops supporting them. Especially because there are all these rumors around why they had to stop competing – that there is something shameful about them. These women can lose their support network overnight and they don’t even get told exactly why.

There are also long-term effects for these women if they try to stay in sports. They are constantly under scrutiny, they start to feel unsafe, people gossip about them constantly. It is a very hard thing to deal with when no one has told you why it is happening in a way that you understand.
 

South African runner Caster Semenya is probably the most famous case of gender testing. Is that where most people’s knowledge of these examinations comes from?

I am privileged to know Ms. Semenya, and she is a wonderful and extremely resilient champion, both on and off the field, who has a very important story to tell. But she is not the whole story. She was already at the top of her career when this happened and people are, rightly, rallying around to support her. She has support in a way that a lot of these women, at the start of their careers, often young and alone and not aware of their rights, do not have. It is, to my mind, a good thing more people are aware of these horrific tests now, but even with that, people don’t realize how many women it affects and what they go through, what they have to overcome.

She is a wonderful champion, but the media should highlight other stories too, of the women who don’t rise to those heights. The women who are just mid-level, proud to represent their country, and trying to build a better life, and then they have it ripped away.
 

What can be done to protect those women?

Education on rights – many athletes didn’t even know that the court of arbitration for sport existed, let alone that they could take their case there. I have been working with women athletes for years trying to make them aware of their rights. It is no coincidence that these policies affect women from poorer countries, where they don’t have the same level of awareness about their rights.

I advise athletes not to allow federations to communicate with them verbally. It is important to have evidence of what the federations ask athletes to do in writing. If they ask for every communication to be in writing, federation officials realize that they must take that athlete seriously and treat her respectfully.

Women are now challenging these policies in courts of law, both national and international. This is a recent development and it makes me happy to see that more and more women athletes from Asia and Africa are becoming conscious of their rights.
 

What about the testing policies?

They need to end. At a national level, and at an international level. There are some women who compete nationally, and then just as they are about to make it to the international stage, they get tested and dropped. There’s major downstream impact from the global regulations. That’s because the national federations or sport ministries see these international federation policies and think they have to test first. All levels of sport need to stop these tests now.
 

Is there anything that makes you hopeful things can change for the better?

These women have been scrutinized for so long and now, finally, that is being switched and it is the federations dealing with scrutiny for what they have done.

This report is the first time the world is truly hearing the voices of some of the women affected by these policies. Annet Negesa, the Ugandan runner who was sex tested and ruled ineligible, broke her silence for first time in an interview to Human Rights Watch last year. That was incredibly brave. Finally, after more than a decade of work, the world is paying attention.

I believe it is extremely powerful that all the affected athletes I am working with are now refusing harmful medical intervention. Dutee Chand and Caster Semenya have spoken openly about not succumbing to any pressure of taking medical steps. They have inspired athletes across the world to switch to a completely new, unrestricted event, rather than consent to these harmful and irreversible medical interventions. Switching events often outs them as having high testosterone. But that is not deterring them. It is a clear message to the World Athletics: “Enough is enough.”

** This interview has been edited and condensed 

/ /

It’s Time to Stop Traveling

,

This is as hard for me to write as it is for travelers to hear: It’s time to consider canceling or postponing your nonessential holiday trips.

Normally at this time of year, I would be writing about strategies to deal with the impending holiday crowds or how the two weeks after Thanksgiving or New Years are the cheapest times of year to travel, the so-called “dead weeks” when demand, and therefore prices, hit annual lows.

I’d be preparing for my annual holiday visit to Atlanta to see my family, or a “bleisure” trip to New York City to see the lights, visit some clients and pay through the nose for a Manhattan hotel.

But as the COVID-19 pandemic rages, with record rates of infections and hospitalizations in California and across the country, the “dead weeks” take on a whole new meaning. In the U.S., we’ve lost nearly 300,000 people, many of whom were, maybe this time last year, our fellow passengers on flights, or the folks across the hall from us in hotels. Maybe they were the business travelers behind us in a long line at SFO security, or the friendly older couple visiting New York City that we bumped into while gawking at the Christmas tree at Rockefeller Center.

What about those travel deals I’ve been writing about in recent months when the virus seemed to be on the wane? If you booked holiday trips at those great rates, consider canceling them or pushing them into the spring.  The airlines no longer charge fees for changes and cancellations on most fares, so it’s not going to cost you much to do so. Hotels in California regions that are affected by shutdowns are now closed to everyone except essential workers for at least the next three weeks, and thankfully offering refunds to those who have to cancel their trips.

We are the survivors of this plague, so let’s do all we can to vanquish this disease for good, including wearing masks, altering our holiday habits and staying off planes. Not forever, but for the next couple months until infection rates decline and we have widespread availability of a vaccine. Once we’ve pushed the virus off the table, we can get back to our frequent travels. But until then, we need to sit still, something that does not come naturally to the frequent traveling crowd.

Dr. Anthony Fauci told CNN Monday that his concerns for the Christmas-New Year’s travel season were the same as his concerns for Thanksgiving, “only this may be even more compounded because it’s a longer holiday.” By mid-January, he warned of a very “dark period” as travelers begin to experience the impact of infections that occurred in late December.

COVID-19 spreads when people move around and breathe each other’s air, so let’s take a collective step back. Those plans to drive home or somewhere else and share air with family, friends or strangers? Nix them. You might be saving your life, or someone else’s, by just staying put. Not forever, but for now.

/ / /

Order of the Health Officer C19-17: Implementing The Terms Of The Regional Stay At Home Order

Sonoma County on Saturday will join five other Bay Area counties that have issued stay-home orders to slow the spread of the coronavirus.

The stay-home order will take effect at 12:01 a.m. Saturday, the county announced on its website Thursday afternoon, citing rising COVID-19 case numbers and hospitalizations.

Under the order, residents will be directed to stay at home except for work, shopping, outdoor recreation or other essential activities, such as medical appointments, allowed under the state’s regional shelter-in-place order. All sectors, other than retail and essential operations, were ordered to close. The new restrictions will remain in place until 11:59 p.m. on Saturday, Jan. 9, 2021.

Under the order, retail operations will be allowed to continue at 20% capacity, or 35% capacity for stand-alone grocery stores. Restaurants will be able to offer take-out, pick up, or delivery. Schools that have received waivers will be allowed to continue operation. Outdoor services are allowed at places of worship.

Hotels, vacation rentals and other lodging will only be allowed to offer accommodations for essential workers or the purpose of isolating people to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Additionally, overnight stays at campgrounds will not be permitted.

The following operations will be required to cease both indoor and outdoor services:

  • Hair salons and barbershops
  • Personal care services
  • Movie theaters (except for drive-in theaters)
  • Wineries, bars, breweries and distilleries (except for operations related to production, manufacturing, distribution and retail sales for off-site consumption)

County’s Health Orders and Guidance are updated as needed based on changing State requirements and current local needs as determined by the County Health Officer. In order to see the most current orders that may supersede any previous order, please view local orders and guidance, and state orders.

The public can see what’s open and what’s closed in Sonoma County to find more details on what businesses are currently open in Sonoma County. The California Blueprint for a Safer Economy provides information on the state’s criteria for loosening and tightening restrictions on activities.

DATE OF AMENDMENT: December 10, 2020

Please read this Order carefully. Violation of or failure to comply with this Order is a misdemeanor punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both. (California Health and Safety Code § 120275, et seq.)

UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTIONS 101040, 101085, AND 120175, THE HEALTH OFFICER OF THE COUNTY OF SONOMA (“HEALTH OFFICER”) ORDERS:

  1. Summary.  To slow the spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (“COVID-19”), this Order of the Sonoma County Health Officer implements the restrictions on businesses and activities set forth in the December 3, 2020, Regional Stay at Home Order and the December 6, 2020 Supplement to Regional Stay at Home Order issued by the California Department of Public Health.
  2. Effective Date and Time.  This order takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on Saturday, December 12, 2020, and will remain in effect until 11:59 p.m. on Saturday, January 9, 2021, unless it is extended, rescinded, superseded, or amended in writing by the Health Officer or State Public Health Officer.
  3. Basis for Order.  Sonoma County is in the midst of a local, regional and statewide surge of COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations that began in the middle of October 2020.  On October 1, 2020, the seven-day average COVID-19 adjusted daily case rate was 13.3 cases per 100,000 people in the County.  According to the most recently reported data, by December 9, 2020, the adjusted rate had nearly doubled, to 25.8 cases per 100,000 persons in the County.  Hospitalizations of COVID-19 patients have also increased, from a seven-day average of 17.8 patients in County hospitals as of October 1, 2020, to a seven-day average of 49.1 patients in County hospitals as of December 9, 2020.Data reported by the State of California indicates that 10 percent to 30 percent of COVID-19 patients will require intensive care.  Of 65 COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the County on December 9, 2020, 11 were in intensive care units (ICUs), and only 10 staffed ICU beds were available in the County for all patients, leaving the County with 18.2% percent available ICU capacity.  Available ICU capacity in hospitals in the Bay Area region was 17.8 percent on December 9, 2020, and is projected to fall to 15 percent by December 14, 2020.  If the current trends continue, according to State projections, Bay Area hospitals collectively may be operating at 91 percent of their full capacity by December 24, 2020, and by January 1, 2021, the demand for ICU beds may exceed the current supply.Surge plans are in place to convert non-ICU hospital beds to ICU beds if necessary, and move non-COVID-19 patients to temporary hospital facilities.  However, due to limitations in the availability of qualified and trained medical personnel, expanding ICU capacity in this manner is not ideal from the standpoint of patient care.  For this reason, the objective now is to manage existing ICU capacity so that all patients who need intensive care have access to an ICU bed.  Reducing the number of transmissions of the COVID-19 virus is critical to meeting this objective.Gatherings of people – social or otherwise – pose risks of virus transmission, even with social distancing and the use face coverings, as neither is 100 percent effective in preventing transmission of the virus that causes COVID-19.  The transmission risk is higher indoors than outdoors, but even outdoor gatherings can result in viral transmissions, particularly in locations where people remove their face coverings to eat or drink.  Large gatherings are more risky than small gatherings, and prolonged interactions – i.e., longer than 15 minutes – are more risky than brief interactions.Reducing the maximum occupancy of businesses has been shown to reduce the risk of transmission of the COVID-19 virus.  Based on models of the effect of occupancy limitations, researchers found that a substantial reduction in the maximum occupancy of a business substantially reduces virus spread but does not as sharply reduce the number of visits to the business.  In the Chicago metropolitan area, for example, a cap on occupancy of businesses at 20 percent of the maximum was found to reduce the predicted number of new infections by more than 80 percent but there was a loss of only 42 percent of overall visits.  Because of the current case and hospitalization rates, it is necessary to impose additional restrictions on businesses and personal activities.The California Department of Public Health issued a Regional Stay at Home Order on December 3, 2020, and a Supplement to Regional Stay at Home Order on December 6, 2020, which impose new restrictions on gatherings, travel, and business activities, effective regionally based when available ICU capacity drops below 15 percent.  To protect the health and safety of County residents, it is necessary to implement the State Order restrictions before the State Order becomes effective regionally.
  4. Implementation of State Order.  The restrictions set forth in the State’s Regional Stay at Home Order, issued on December 3, 2020, the December 6, 2020 Supplement, and any further amendments, supplements, or guidance issued by the State will apply throughout the County. The Regional Stay at Home Order can be located here: https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/Pages/Guidance.aspx https://covid19.ca.gov/stay-home-except-for-essential-needs/
  5. Other Orders.  To the extent that this Order conflicts with the Health Officer’s June 18, 2020, Order (C19-15), as amended, which authorizes businesses to operate in the County in accordance with State guidelines and restrictions applicable to the tier of the State Blueprint that the County is in, or any other Order issued by the Health Officer in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, this Order will control.
  6. Enforcement.  Pursuant to Government Code sections 26602 and 41601 and Health and Safety Code section 101029, the Health Officer requests that the Sheriff and all chiefs of police in the County ensure compliance with and enforce this Order.  The Sheriff, chiefs of police, County Counsel, District Attorney, and city attorneys are empowered to ensure compliance with and enforce this Order within their jurisdictions. The violation of any provision of this Order constitutes an imminent threat and menace to public health, constitutes a public nuisance, and is punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both.
  7. Justification.  The Health Officer has determined that this Order, and its Prior Shelter Orders, were and are necessary because cases of COVID-19 have been confirmed throughout the County.  COVID-19 is highly contagious and has a propensity to spread in various ways including, but not limited to, by attaching to surfaces or remaining in the air, resulting in physical damage and/or physical loss.
  8. Public Distribution.  Copies of this Order shall promptly be: (1) made available at the County Administration Center at 575 Administration Drive, Santa Rosa CA 95403; (2) posted on the County Public Health Department website (https://sonomacounty.ca.gov/Health/Public-Health/) and (https://socoemergency.org/); and (3) provided to any member of the public requesting a copy of this Order.
  9. Severability.  If any provision of this Order to the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid, the reminder of the Order, including the application of such part or provision to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected and shall continue in full force and effect.  To this end, the provisions of this Order are severable.

/ /

Switzerland Looks Set to be the Next to Legalize Same-sex Marriage

,

Switzerland has taken a major step on the path to equality after its parliament voted overwhelmingly in favour of a law to pass same-sex marriage.

The council of states – the upper house of Switzerland’s legislature – voted by by 22 votes to 15 to approve landmark legislation to make same-sex marriage a reality. Just seven politicians abstained from the vote.

It’s a huge moment for a country that has lagged behind most of Europe when it comes to LGBT+ rights, and is the culmination of a seven-year campaign.

“We have been waiting for this for seven years,” Olga Baranova of the Marriage For All campaign told Le Temps. “The emotions are very strong.”

The bill first introduced by the Green Party in 2013, and several versions of the text have since been debated. One of the central questions was whether a constitutional change was required to make it happen or whether a change of law would be enough.

Article 14 of Switzerland’s constitution states that “the right to marry and to have a family is guaranteed.” Those in favour of a legal change argued there was no need to change this because it already accommodates marriages of any kind.

The majority council of states agreed and rejected a motion that would have required a nationwide constitutional referendum on marriage equality, which would have delayed the law even further.

The push for equality was helped in part by progressive parties’ electoral gains in October that shifted parliament more to the left.

It’s been a long time coming for the Swiss LGBT+ community, whose conservative country has been slow to enact positive change: the first law banning LGBT+ discrimination only passed as recently as this February.

It’s not the end of the road though, and the next battle will concern LGBT+ couples’ access to sperm donors.

While the vast majority of Swiss people are now in favour of same-sex marriage, the debate around insemination remains controversial and is likely to be the subject of a national referendum.

/ /

Brits Living with HIV to Receive Coronavirus Vaccine alongside Cancer Patients, Diabetics

Public Health England has finally confirmed where people living with HIV land on the coronavirus vaccine priority list.

On Tuesday (8 December) the UK became the first country in the world to start administering the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine after it was approved my regulators last week.

The government has now released the order of priority in which the vaccine will be given out, and those who are HIV-positive will be in the sixth group, along with other “adults aged 18 to 65 years in an at-risk group”.

“At-risk” adults also include those undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy, people diagnosed with a blood cancer like leukaemia, and people with severe asthma, diabetes, heart problems or kidney disease. The group also includes those with a severe mental illness or learning disability.

The sixth risk group follows care home residents and staff, those over and 80 and health and social care workers, people over 75, people over 70 and the extremely clinically vulnerable individuals, and people over the age of 65.

Some studies have shown that those living with HIV are at an increased risk of dying from COVID-19 and, although information is conflicting, one small London study found that HIV-positive people with low CD4 cell counts were more likely to be admitted to hospital with COVID-19 than other people with HIV, according to HIV and AIDS charity NAM/ aidsmap.

NAM/aidsmap executive director Matthew Hodson told PinkNews: “Although there is little evidence that people living with HIV are more likely to acquire COVID, there may be a slightly increased risk of dying from COVID-19.

“People who are not virally suppressed on treatment for HIV are likely to be at greater risk. COVID has underlined the importance of prompt HIV diagnosis and treatment access.

“Some of the vaccines, such as the Oxford and Pfizer vaccines, specifically recruited people living with HIV, although the full results of these studies have not yet been released.

“On a personal level, as someone who has been living with HIV for 22 years, I will not hesitate to get vaccinated.”

Vaccine misinformation has been spreading like wildfire on social media, and this is no different when it comes to the safety of the coronavirus vaccine for people with HIV.

NHS HIV consultant Dr Rageshri Dhairyawan wrote on Twitter: “A WhatsApp message is circulating saying that people living with HIV should not accept the vaccine, as it is a way for the government to kill them, as they are too expensive to look after on the NHS. THIS IS NOT TRUE. It’s vital we discuss people’s fears!”

https://platform.twitter.com/embed/index.html?creatorScreenName=lilylwakefield&dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-0&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1336393600968634370&lang=en-gb&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pinknews.co.uk%2F2020%2F12%2F09%2Fcoronavirus-vaccine-hiv-positive-priority-groups-pfizer-biontech%2F&siteScreenName=PinkNews&theme=light&widgetsVersion=ed20a2b%3A1601588405575&width=500px

She added: “Made sure to recommend COVID-19 vaccines to all of my patients in clinic today. A lot of concerns, so it was great to discuss and address them.

“Interestingly, some people said it was reassuring to hear I was going to get one, as it made them feel more confident about them.”

/ /

Trump’s New Religious Exemptions for Employers an Invitation to Discriminate, Critics Say

The Trump administration has issued new guidance on religious exemptions for federal contractors that critics say grants them carte blanche to discriminate against LGBTQ workers, women, religious minorities and others.

The Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs released Monday its final rule on exemptions to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and a related 1965 executive order instituting anti-discrimination requirements for federal contractors.

The provision expands exceptions to any contractors — for-profit or nonprofit — who “hold themselves out to the public as carrying out a religious purpose.”

“This rule is intended to correct any misperception that religious organizations are disfavored in government contracting by setting forth appropriate protections for their autonomy to hire employees who will further their religious missions,” it reads in part. According to the office, the new rule “reduces confusion” and reinforces existing statutes, including the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 1993 legislation intended to prevent the federal government from “substantially burdening a person’s exercise of religion.”

“Religious organizations should not have to fear that acceptance of a federal contract or subcontract will require them to abandon their religious character or identity,” Secretary of Labor Eugene Scalia said in a statement.

Related

NBC OUT

LGBTQ rights fight reignited 4 years after N.C.’s ‘bathroom bill’ controversy

The U.S. government is the single largest customer in the world, awarding hundreds of billions of dollars in federal contracts each year to companies covering every facet of life, from military hardware to social services. Signed by President Lyndon Johnson in 1965, Executive Order 11246 prohibited businesses with government contracts over $10,000 from employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. It did, however, stipulate religious organizations could prefer to hire ‘individuals of a particular religion.’”

In a subsequent order in 2014, President Barack Obama added gender identity and sexual orientation to the list of characteristics protected in EO 11246.

The Labor Department first proposed the new religious exemption guidelines in August 2019 and received more than 109,000 comments during the public comment period — including more than 90,000 from organized letter-writing campaigns.

Civil rights organizations blasted Monday’s final rule for disarming existing nondiscrimination protections with overly broad exemptions.

Alison Gill, vice president for legal and policy at American Atheists, called it “an absolute attack on religious equality and workers’ rights.”

Employees — especially those of government contractors — shouldn’t face a religious litmus test to get or keep their jobs, she said in a statement. “The American taxpayer should not be forced to fund discrimination, period.”

Jennifer Pizer, director of law and policy for LGBTQ legal organization Lambda Legal, said the new guidance is part of a decadeslong effort by Christian conservatives to remove anti-discrimination safeguards.

“The argument is, ‘If faith-based groups don’t receive government money with the freedom to act however they want to, then that’s discrimination. We must do it this way, and you must fund us,’” Pizer told NBC News.

Not long ago, she said, that suggestion would have been seen as a violation of the Constitution’s establishment clause, which prohibits the government from establishing an official religion or favoring one faith above others.

“But now it’s part of a growing victim narrative among the Christian right,” Pizer said. “It’s a flabbergasting alternate reality where white Christian society is somehow under attack by people who want equal rights.”

The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs guidelines “are not a surprise,” she added, “but they’re a profound affront to one of the basic principles our nation was founded on.”

With evangelicals among his strongest supporters, President Donald Trump has made religious freedom a key tenet of his administration: He’s issued executive orders protecting prayer in school and clergy who endorse political candidates from the pulpit. He also broadened the range of employers who can refuse to cover birth control under their health insurance policies. The Department of Justice under Trump issued amicus briefs supporting religious liberty in several Supreme Court cases, including Masterpiece Cakeshop v Colorado Civil Rights Commission, in which a Christian baker refused to sell a wedding cake to a gay couple, and the still-pending Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, which addresses whether faith-based child welfare agencies can turn away LGBTQ foster and adoptive parents and still receive taxpayer money.

In 2018, Trump announced a new White House faith and opportunity initiative, designed to “to remove barriers which have unfairly prevented faith-based organizations from working with or receiving funding from the federal government.”

Download the NBC News app for breaking news and politics

The Labor Department was among nine agencies that proposed subsequent guidelines to “safeguard the fundamental right to religious freedom by eliminating unfair and unequal treatment by the federal government,” according to deputy press secretary Judd Deere.

The Department of Education issued its final rule in September, while other agencies have yet to finalize their plans. The Labor Department policy announced Monday won’t take effect until Jan. 8, less than two weeks before Inauguration Day.

President-elect Joe Biden’s transition team declined to comment on whether it would overturn the new rule. However, in previously released policy statements, Biden has committed to restoring “full implementation” of President Barack Obama’s executive order prohibiting discrimination by federal contractors on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.

But even if they’re only in effect for a limited time, Pizer said, the policies “invite discrimination — and represent a real legal and political view that’s moving forward.”

/

Family Justice Center’s virtual fundraiser and silent auction, “Hope is Not Cancelled” Happens Tonight

You are invited to join us for the Family Justice Center’s virtual fundraiser and silent auction, “Hope is Not Cancelled.” 

Click on https://fjcsonomacounty.cbo.io  to view information about the event and by scrolling to the bottom of the page, you can preview the auction items before you register.   If you are interested in bidding on an item and/or viewing the live event, then register and you will be set!  Once registered you can bid from the convenience of your computer or phone until the auction closes on Friday evening. The silent auction starts today, December 9th, at noon and will close following the live event on Friday, December 11th.   

The live event with Senator Mike McGuire will be on December 11, 2020 at 5:00 p.m., please take the time to sit down with a glass of wine and enjoy the one hour event. I promise you will be touched. 

Every dollar you bid will go to support critical services for victims and survivors of domestic violence, elder abuse, child abuse and sexual assault.  Besides bidding, you can contribute to our Fund-A-Need during the live event or on the auction site.   Anyone who donates $500 or more to the FJC Fund-A-Need will receive a bottle Natural’ California Champagne from Korbel, my amazing employer and event sponsor, as a celebratory thank you!   We have many great items that will make wonderful holiday gifts and premium wines for your holiday celebrations including:1.  Paris on the Terrace for Two at Jordan Vineyard and Winery2.  Family Pass to the USS Hornet Museum3.  Dinner for 8 at Wild Oak Saddle Club4.  Wine Tastings at Cuvaison,Taft Street Winery, Portalupi, Hook and Ladder, Mill Creek Vineyards and many other wineries5.  Gift Certificate for $200 at Rivers End Restaurant6.  Locally Crafted Custom Bluebird Nesting Box7.  Double Magnums, Magnums and bottles of exclusive wines from James Family Cellars, Siduri, Dutton-Goldfield, Russian River Vineyards and many more8.  Dinner for 4 at Baci Restaurant in Healdsburg9.  Gift Baskets from Amy’s Kitchen, Willibee’s Wine & Spirits, Bottle Barn and the Museum of Sonoma County You can also meet our new Executive Director, Marsha Lucien, during the live event and take a virtual tour of the center and see inspiring short (I promise!) videos about the great work being done by the Family Justice Center.  Now, more than ever, we need to keep hope alive for victims of abuse.   

I hope you will join us,Jill RavitchFJCSC Foundation Board If you prefer to make a contribution by check please mail it to: Family Justice Center Sonoma County, 2755 Mendocino Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA 95403.  If you want to let me know about your mail-in contribution before 3:00 p.m. on Friday, December 11th, I will make sure that it is doubled by one of our live event matching donors.  If you are contributing through the website or during the event, this will happen automatically and you don’t need to notify me (unless, of course you want to)!  Thank you to all my friends and family for your support and contributions for the FJC, I assure you that it is a wonderful place doing wonderful things for many people.   

/

Happening this Month at Marin’s Spahr Center

Community and Connection DuringAnother Covid-19 Caused Shutdown 
Residents of the Bay Area have once again been asked to stay at home through at least the end of December, except when conducting essential business, and also to scrupulously observe prevention practices including mask wearing, social distancing and frequent handwashing. We know that stay at home orders are truly difficult for all of our constituents, and very likely to deepen isolation and depression to troublesome levels. This is especially true during the Holidays, when all of us hope for and are accustomed to gathering with friends and loved ones for warmth and celebration. 
The Spahr Center wants to remind our clients and supporters that we are here for you during this time. We continue to hold discussion groups and social activities by Zoom. Our therapists are available to provide support. We will help you to build or maintain community and connection as best we can – during and after Covid. Reach us at info@thespahrcenter.org or 415.886.8551. 
Art by @hellomynameiswednesday.
Many Hands Make Light Work –Volunteer with The Spahr Center!
As an essential business during the Covid-19 emergency, The Spahr Center operates programs that have to continue serving people no matter what! This includes our food pantry and syringe access program, as well as programs that keep our clients connected to community to prevent isolation and depression. (See our story on the new Friendly Visitor program.) All of these programs need additional hands to ensure that HIV-positive and LGBTQ+ people in Marin have the support they need.
We are sensitive to the fact that much of the work we do must be done in our Corte Madera office. We take mask wearing, distancing and cleanliness very seriously, and will create the safest possible experience for our volunteers! 
If you are interested in working with us, please contact info@thespahrcenter.org, or call 415.886.8551 to discuss. 
Friendly Visits for LGBT Seniors –Our Newest Program
The Spahr Center serves a wonderful and large group of seniors through discussion groups, counseling services, and social activities (many of which are provided by our friends at the Social Committee). These services help to build community and belonging for LGBT seniors, and are among our most rewarding offerings. We know that there are many additional LGBT seniors in Marin County who are living alone or in residential care facilities who feel very isolated from their peers, and long for connection – especially during Covid! 
With support from the Marin County Non-Profit Community Partner Program, Horizons Foundation and Westamerica Bank, The Spahr Center is launching a Friendly Visitor Program. We are recruiting volunteers to be trained to be in regular contact with an LGBT senior by phone or over Zoom to share stories, discuss mutual interests and form a friendship. We also plan to connect seniors new to our LGBT programs to all of the services provided by The Spahr Center.
We welcome Spahrklers (Spahrkle readers) to let us know if you are aware of an LGBT senior who might enjoy participating in the Friendly Visitor Program. Additionally, we seek volunteers who have 2 to 5 hours a week to serve as Friendly Visitors! This involves some training, making weekly visits, and reporting back to our staff every week about how things are going.
Please contact Bill Blackburn at bblackburn@thespahrcenter.org if you would like to help!
Make Your End of Tax Year Donation Today – Support The Spahr Center to Achieve its New Strategic Plan!
On November 23, The Spahr Center released its Strategic Plan to guide our programs and advocacy from 2021 to 2025. It is a bold and visionary road map to respond to the needs and aspirations articulated by 150 community members and service providers. Our 6 Priorities and 15 action items will further ensure that members of the HIV and LGBTQ+ communities feel better connected to one another and supported; that a comprehensive, quality system of medical and social services exists to meet their needs; and that Marin’s residents and key institutions are fully embracing. We encourage you to review our Plan at www.thespahrcenter.org.
We ask that our supporters make a generous contribution to help us carry out our vision of an LGBTQ+ and HIV community that is connected, empowered, and thriving within a supportive Marin County. Please consider making a monthly pledge to sustain the life-saving and life-affirming work of this one-of-a-kind agency. Visit https://www.mightycause.com/organization/spahrcenter TODAY!  
Follow Our Lifesaving Harm Reduction ProgramsOn Twitter! @4harmreduction
The Spahr Center protects dozens of lives every year through its program to provide sterile syringes to injection drug users and collect used syringes, as well as its program to distribute Naloxone widely to prevent opioid related overdoses. The program is funded by the State of California, County of Marin and private foundations to prevent HIV infection, hepatitis C infection and overdoses, as well as to link individuals to needed medical care and other social services.   
We encourage Spahrkle readers to learn more about the principles of and approaches to harm reduction at www.harmreduction.org and also to follow our harm reduction program on Twitter: @4harmreduction. And please see our related interview with Lyra Smith in this issue of Spahrkle!
Spotlight on the Great People of the Spahr Center – Focus on Lyra Smith
With this issue of Spahrkle, we launch a monthly profile of some of the wonderful clients, staff members, volunteers, donors, and supporters who deliver the important programs of The Spahr Center and contribute to its culture of compassion and outstanding service to the community. We start with Lyra Smith!
In December, Lyra took on the important role of Development Assistant here at Spahr to support our fundraising activities. Lyra continues her service as a super-dedicated and effective volunteer with the Syringe Access Program – helping to staff sites at which we provide sterile syringes, hand out Naloxone to prevent overdoses, and link injection drug users to medical and social support programs. We are so grateful to Lyra for her enthusiastic and conscientious work for the community.
Rhiannon Saltzman, The Spahr Center’s Harm Reduction Manager, had a sit down with Lyra to ask her a few questions about her life and activities. See her responses by clicking here:    
Focus on Lyra
School Board Candidate Forums Show Huge Potential for LGBTQ+ School Advocacy
This year, The Spahr Center’s held student-led candidate forums for the Tamalpais Union, San Rafael, Sausalito/Marin City, and Novato school board races. The forums were live streamed over Facebook and facilitated by members of our Social Justice Fellowship and Middle School Leadership Institute programs. The forums proved to be very generative spaces that allowed candidates to hear the needs of LGBTQ+ students in their schools and express their commitments to providing more support. The youth participants voiced immense amounts of excitement for how all of the candidates participating enthusiastically engaged with LGBTQ+ issues and brainstormed possibilities for the future.
Some of the ideas generated by school board members included a district-level LGBTQ+ task force, increased counseling resources, needs assessments, curriculum revisions, cultural competency, and more! It was powerful for these ideas to come from school board candidates, and The Spahr Center is excited to collaborate with those who have now been elected. Stay tuned for more updates on the youth program’s advocacy work moving forward!
Chiqui Diaz, member of The Spahr Center’s Social Justice Fellowship Program, wins California activism award! 
Chiqui was one of 6 young people from across the state named “Voices for Change” by the California Endowment. The Youth Awards honor young leaders who engage civically, volunteer locally, advocate for important causes, or encourage engagement among their peers. The award seeks to recognize youth who take brave action when faced with deep-rooted systemic barriers and injustice, have shown up in their community as agents of change, have made a positive impact on their community at large, and will continue to evolve as leaders in the years ahead.
The California Endowment describes the youth as “agents of change who have dedicated themselves to the hard work of addressing social injustices or inequalities in their local community or state. And we completely agree! Chiqui is an incredible community activist. We wanted to share more about her work in Marin County. Read more about her here:
Focus on Chiqui

/ /

Anti-LGBTQ School where Karen Pence Teaches Obtained $725K in PPP Money

,

A Christian school in Virginia infamous for banning LGBTQ teachers and students after second lady Karen Pence took a teaching job there obtained nearly $725,000 in PPP funds despite its anti-LGBTQ policies, the Washington Blade has learned.

A look at the distribution for the COVID-19 bailout funds, as documented by the government watchdog Accountable.US, reveals Immanuel Christian School in Springfield, Va., obtained the six-figure grant as part of the Paycheck Protection Program, which sought to keep small businesses afloat amid the coronavirus pandemic. 

Immanuel Christian School claimed 115 jobs saved with the PPP money, according to the raw SBA data.

“It is shameful that an institution that discriminates against LGBT Americans received nearly $1 million in taxpayer funds,” Kyle Herrig, president of government watchdog Accountable.US, said in a statement. “This money was meant to help mom and pop small businesses meet payroll and keep the lights on — instead the wealthy and well-connected cashed in.”

The Small Business Administration operated the $669 billion program, which the agency says saved more than 51 million jobs during the coronavirus and is credited with being the most successful jobs program in U.S. history. (A report earlier this year in Axios, however, contested that estimate and said the number of jobs saved was closer to 13.6 million.)

Shannon Giles, a spokesperson for the Small Business Administration, declined to comment on the $725,000 given to Immanuel Christian School, citing a practice of no comment on individual borrowers.

Immanuel Christian School doesn’t just have policies excluding LGBTQ people, but declares in its employment application “homosexual acts and lifestyles are clearly perversion and reprehensible in the sight of God.” The school bars admissions of students if they identify as LGBTQ or come from LGBTQ families and refuses to employ LGBTQ teachers. 

The school’s guidelines are listed in its “parent agreement,” which states Immanuel Christian School “can refuse admission to an applicant or to discontinue enrollment if the atmosphere or conduct within a particular home, the activities of a parent or guardian, or the activities of the student are counter to, or are in opposition to, the biblical lifestyle the school teaches.”

Immanuel Christian School didn’t respond Thursday to the Blade’s request to comment on whether it was appropriate for the school to accept taxpayer funds when it would reject taxpayers from admission or employment based on LGBTQ status.

Karen Pence accepted a position teaching art two days a week at the school in early 2019, returning after having worked there when her husband was a congressman. 

“I am excited to be back in the classroom and doing what I love to do, which is to teach art to elementary students,” Pence said in a statement at the time.

Both President Trump and Vice President Mike Pence have defended Karen Pence for taking a job as an art teacher at the school. Trump called her a “terrific woman” during a February 2019 speech at the National Prayer Breakfast in response to her position at Immanuel Christian School, while Pence said in an interview with EWTN Global Catholic Network he was “deeply offended” by the criticism.

“The freedom of religion is not just enshrined in the Constitution, it’s enshrined in the hearts of the American people,” Mike Pence said later at the 2019 Conservative Action Political Conference. “But make no mistake about it. The freedom of religion is under attack in this country. Lately, it’s actually become fashionable for media elites and Hollywood liberals to mock religious belief.”

Neither the White House nor the vice president’s office responded to the Blade’s request to comment on whether it was OK for Immanuel Christian School to receive PPP money with anti-LGBTQ polices in place.

Current federal law doesn’t prohibit anti-LGBTQ discrimination in the distribution of PPP funds. Although the U.S. Supreme Court ruling this year in Bostock v. Clayton County determined anti-LGBTQ discrimination is a form of sex discrimination, therefore illegal in the workforce under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, has broad applications to all laws against sex discrimination, it has no bearing on federal programs like PPP. 

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which covers federal programs, bars discrimination on the basis of race, color and national origin, but says nothing about sex, let alone sexual orientation or gender identity.

Ian Thompson, legislative director for American Civil Liberties Union, affirmed the Bostock decision “would not apply” in the context of PPP, but said the Equality Act, legislation that would expand the prohibition on anti-LGBTQ discrimination under the Civil Rights Act, would rectify the situation.

“The Equality Act would fix this gap in civil rights law by making it illegal to discriminate with federal funding based on sex [including sexual orientation and gender identity],” Thompson said. “When the Equality Act is the law of the land, recipients of federal funding would not be permitted to have policies that openly discriminate against LGBTQ people.”

Thompson, however, conceded Immanuel Christian School may still be acting unlawfully in the aftermath of the Bostock decision regardless of whether or not it got PPP funds for having policies discriminating against LGBTQ employees or students.

“If a religious school were refusing to employ LGBTQ people or to enroll LGBTQ students, we think that would violate Title VII and Title IX under Bostock, regardless of whether it got a PPP loan or not,” Thompson said. “We also think that a policy of excluding LGBTQ people would be unlawful, but there might be a question of who had standing to challenge that policy if no one was actually excluded. And there would also be a question about whether the religious school would have access to a religious exemption, either under Title VII or Title IX or RFRA or the Constitution.”

«‹ 546 547 548 549›»