Ace’s Place, which opened in Queens this week, will offer 150 beds, services like counseling and a work-study program.Kayla Bartkowski / Getty Images
New York City opened the country’s first city-funded shelter for transgender and gender-nonconforming people experiencing homelessness.
Ace’s Place, which opened this week in Queens and will offer 150 beds, is a collaboration between the NYC Department of Social Services and Destination Tomorrow, an LGBTQ nonprofit in the Bronx.
Ace’s Place will provide transitional housing as well as other services including individual and group counseling, planning and assistance for permanent housing, referrals to medical and mental health services, support groups, life skills and financial literacy workshops and employment assistance. Destination Tomorrow is also developing a work-study program for the culinary arts for residents interested in working in hospitality and food service, according to a press release from the nonprofit.
“Ace’s Place is a community-driven answer to systemic neglect, and it’s only the beginning,” Sean Ebony Coleman, founder and CEO of Destination Tomorrow, said in a statement.Destination Tomorrow
“We couldn’t be prouder to make this historic announcement that strongly affirms our values and commitment to strengthening the safety net for transgender New Yorkers at a time when their rights are roundly under attack,” Molly Wasow Park, Department of Social Services commissioner, said in a statement. “Ace’s Place will offer Transgender New Yorkers a safe place to heal and stabilize in trauma-informed settings with the support of staff who are deeply invested in their growth and wellbeing.”
Sean Ebony Coleman, founder and CEO of Destination Tomorrow, said Ace’s Place is a “hard-fought declaration that our Transgender and gender nonconforming siblings will no longer be pushed to the margins.”
“Ace’s Place is a community-driven answer to systemic neglect, and it’s only the beginning,” Coleman said in a statement.
Trans people disproportionately experience homelessness, in part due to facing more employment discrimination. The 2022 U.S. Trans Survey, the largest nationwide survey of trans people, with more than 90,000 respondents, found that 30% of respondents reported experiencing homelessness in their lifetimes. Eleven percent of those who had ever held a job said they had been fired, forced to resign, lost the job or been laid off because of their gender identity or expression. More than one-third (34%) of respondents were experiencing poverty.
Ace’s Place is one of only two organizations in New York City that will provide housing for adults in the LGBTQ community. Nearly all of the city’s LGBTQ shelters are for people under 25.
Back in April, Uncloseted Media documented every move President Donald Trump made on LGBTQ issues in his first 100 days and uncovered a relentless and unprecedented attack against the community. That attack has only intensified. Here’s the Trump administration’s complete track record from days 101-200.
May 1, 2025
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) publishes “Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria: Review of Evidence and Best Practices,” a 409‑page report promoting “gender exploratory therapy.” The report’s nine authors are left anonymous in a move experts have called unusual. MIT philosophy professor Alex Byrne would later come forward as one of the authors, drawing criticism for his lack of medical expertise. Medical experts and advocacy groups criticize the review as biased, misleading and akin to conversion therapy.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) cuts more than $800 million in research grants meant to study the health of LGBTQ people. The cuts abandon studies of cancers and viruses and setback efforts to defeat a resurgence of sexually transmitted infections, according to an analysis of federal data by The New York Times. They also eliminate swaths of medical research on diseases that disproportionately afflict LGBTQ people.
In termination letters, the NIH justifies the cuts by telling scientists that their work “no longer effectuates agency priorities.” In some cases, they say the research had been “based on gender identity,” which gave rise to “unscientific” results that ignored “biological realities.”
May 5, 2025
The Department of Justice (DOJ) removes all references to gender or gender identity from at least four federal surveys. The changes will make it nearly impossible to monitor crimes and other forms of violence experienced by transgender people.
May 7, 2025
The Supreme Court rules that President Trump’s ban on transgender troops serving in the military can go into effect immediately while the courts decide a final outcome. Alaina Kupec, a retired transgender U.S. Navy lieutenant, says the decision punishes people who are qualified and want to serve the country. “[This is] a really dark day for our country where basically we’re allowed to discriminate against a class of people.”
May 27, 2025
Trump threatens to withhold federal funding, “maybe permanently,” if California does not prevent high school junior AB Hernandez, a transgender track and field athlete, from competing in state finals. California would reject Trump’s demands, and Hernandez would go on to compete.
May 30, 2025
NIH cuts funding for the Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Development, a consortium of researchers from Duke University and Scripps Research. Researchers say that the program was close to a breakthrough and that the cuts could set HIV vaccine research back by as much as a decade.
June 2025
Trump does not acknowledge Pride month. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavittsays, “There are no plans for a proclamation for the month of June, but I can tell you this president is very proud to be a president for all Americans, regardless of race, religion or creed,” notably leaving out the LGBTQ community and never using the word “Pride.”
June 3, 2025
Photo by Ted Sahl.
The Trump administration’s Department of Defense removes LGBTQ icon Harvey Milk’s name from a U.S. naval vessel and plans to rename it. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth suggests ships should not honor civil rights leaders, saying, “People want to be proud of the ship they’re sailing in.” One defense official says Hegseth intentionally did this at the beginning of Pride Month.
Trump’s military ban goes into full force and the involuntary separation of transgender service members begins. Those who did not identify themselves will have their medical records surveyed and be involuntarilyseparated if it is discovered that they are trans.
June 9, 2025
NIH staffers issue the Bethesda declaration, stating that the Trump administration has forced the NIH to “[politicize] research by halting high-quality, peer reviewed grants and contracts” as well as “[censor] critical research” on subjects including health disparities, health impacts of climate change and gender identity. The declaration has been signed by at least 484 staffers.
NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya would later push back, saying the cuts align with the president’s agenda. “Making America healthy again involves deprioritizing research that doesn’t have a chance of making America healthy, [such as] a lot of ideological research.”
June 17, 2025
The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) announces that the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline will shutter LGBTQ youth services on July 17, with the Trump administration saying the program promotes “radical gender ideology” without parental consent. In the announcement, SAMHSA notably drops the “T” in their references to the “LBG+” community.
The same day, a White House spokesperson attacks a federal judge’s ruling to block the Trump administration from disallowing transgender and intersex Americans to obtain passports aligned with their gender identity, calling it an attempt to “push radical gender ideology.” The judge rules that Trump’s executive order likely violates the Fifth Amendment as it discriminates on the basis of sex.
Reid Solomon-Lane, a transgender man and a plaintiff in Orr v. Trump, responds to the attacks: “I thought that 18 years after transitioning, I would be able to live my life in safety. … Now, as a married father of three … if my passport were to reflect a sex designation that is inconsistent with who I am, I would be forcibly outed every time I used [it] for travel or identification, causing potential harm to my safety and my family’s safety.”
June 18, 2025
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court rules in favor of United States v. Skrmetti, upholding Tennessee’s SB1 law, which bans gender-affirming care for minors. As a result, 25 statewide bans on gender-affirming care remain in effect.
In an interview with Uncloseted Media, five trans youth speak out about the decision, with one saying, “Lawmakers don’t need to be involved in my doctor visits. … They’ve got a lane and they should stay in it.”
That same day, the acting chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission admits at her confirmation hearing that transgender workers are protected under civil rights laws. Despite this, she defends dropping lawsuits on their behalf, saying the agency must follow Trump’s executive orders.
June 30, 2025
The Trump administration withholds nearly $7 billion in school funding as it investigates whether the funds support undocumented students or LGBTQ-inclusive education.
But after pressure led by Democratic Congresswoman Alma S. Adams, Trump administration officials would later announce that they will release the funds.
June 2025
Responding to Trump’s executive order that bans gender-affirming care for people younger than 19, major health networks and many regional centers begin suspending care. The lines drawn are arbitrary. At Stanford, patients as old as 18 are affected. Children’s Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) announces that in July they will begin cutting off care for patients as old as 25. CHLA states that they were left with “no viable alternative” because they could not risk any cuts to their federal funding.
July 2, 2025
HHS orders teen pregnancy prevention programs to exclude LGBTQ content or lose federal funding, despite data showing higher pregnancy rates among LGBTQ teens. The directive affects 73 organizations.
July 4, 2025
Trump signs his “Big Beautiful Bill” into law. The sweeping package of tax breaks that largely benefits the wealthy includes major funding cuts to HIV and LGBTQ health care, as well as a number of support programs that disproportionately serve queer people.
July 9, 2025
The DOJ subpoenas over 20 health clinics and doctors for providing gender-affirming care to minors. A former DOJ official calls the move “highly unusual.”
July 10, 2025
Screenshot of Stonewall Website.
Mentions of bisexuals and bisexuality are removed from several parts of the National Park Service’s website on the Stonewall National Monument, though some would later be restored. This comes five months after mentions of trans people were erased.
July 17, 2025
Genna Brown used an LGBTQ crisis hotline for the first time when she was 10 years old. Photo by Kaoly Gutierrez for Uncloseted Media.
The Trump administration officially shuts down the LGBTQ-specific option on the 988 youth suicide hotline. Notably, there are no plans to shut down theother targeted hotline options, including the Veterans Crisis Line, the Spanish Language Line and the Native and Strong Lifeline.
Arden, who called when they were 16, told Uncloseted Media, “If it weren’t for the hotline, I would have killed myself.”
July 18, 2025
State Department officials tell the Guardian that nearly $10 million in U.S.-funded contraceptives, purchased for now-defunct foreign aid programs, are set to be destroyed after being unable to find any “eligible buyers,” in part due to a gag rule reinstated and expanded by Trump that bansfunding to overseas reproductive health, family planning and HIV-prevention programs as well as LGBTQ health initiatives. The contraceptives are currently being stored in a Belgian warehouse until their eventual demise, with the Washington Post reporting that, as of April, the stock included over 26 million condoms, millions of birth control packets, hundreds of thousands of contraceptive implants, nearly 2 million injectable contraceptive doses and more than 50,000 vials of HIV-prevention medication.
That same day, a federal judge issues a preliminary injunction against a law requiring clergy in Washington State to report child abuse disclosed during confession, finding the law likely violates the First Amendment by forcing priests to choose between their religious vows and civil obligations. The ruling, which upholds the absolute confidentiality of confession, follows the Trump administration’s DOJ joining a lawsuit on the side of the plaintiffs the month prior.
July 21, 2025
The U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee bans transgender women from competing in women’s Olympic sports. The committee claims they have an “obligation to comply with federal expectations,” citing Trump’s executive order, “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports.”
July 22, 2025
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) dismisses abuse allegations from Andry Hernández Romero, a gay Venezuelan makeup artist the Trump administration deported to an El Salvadoran maximum-security prison, where he spent 125 days. Hernández Romero reports torture, sexual assault and other inhumane treatment. DHS labels him and others as “criminal, illegal gang members,” despite his clean record and lawful attempt to seek asylum in the U.S.
July 24, 2025
American painter Amy Sherald cancels a Smithsonian art show after the institution attempts to remove her painting “Trans Forming Liberty” that depicts a transgender woman as the Statue of Liberty. Sherald speculates that the Smithsonian’s decision was motivated in part by “institutional fear” of an anti-trans political climate.
Sixteen states and the District of Columbia sue the Trump administration for its attempts to institute a de facto national ban on gender-affirming care for transgender youth. “The federal government is running a cruel and targeted harassment campaign against providers who offer lawful, lifesaving care to children,” writes New York Attorney General Letitia James.
An Islamic court in Indonesia’s conservative Aceh province on Monday sentenced two men to public caning, 80 times each, after Islamic religious police caught them engaged in what the court deemed were sexual acts: hugging and kissing.
The trial at the Islamic Shariah District Court in Banda Aceh, the provincial capital, was held behind closed doors. Judges have the authority to limit public access in such a case and open it only for the verdict.
The two men, aged 20 and 21, were arrested in April after residents saw them entering the same bathroom at Taman Sari city park and reported it to police patrolling the area. The police broke into the toilet and caught the men kissing and hugging, which the court considered to be a sexual act.
The lead judge, Rokhmadi M. Hum, said the two college students were “legally and convincingly” proven to have violated Islamic law by committing acts that lead to gay sexual relations. The court didn’t publicly identify the men.
Prosecutors previously sought 85 strokes of the cane for each, but the three-judge panel decided on what they described as lenient punishment because the men were outstanding students who were polite in court, cooperated with authorities and had no previous convictions.
The judges also ordered the time they have served to be deducted from their sentence. It means the number of lashes will be reduced by four as they have been detained for four months.
The prosecutor, Alfian, who like many Indonesians uses only a single name, said he was not satisfied with the lighter sentence. But he said he will not appeal.
Aceh is the only province in Muslim-majority Indonesia allowed to observe a version of Islamic law. It allows up to 100 lashes for morality offenses including gay sex. Caning is also punishment for adultery, gambling, drinking and for women who wear tight clothes and men who skip Friday prayers.
Indonesia’s secular central government granted Aceh the right to implement the law in 2006 as part of a peace deal to end a separatist war. Aceh implemented an expansion in 2015 that extended the law to non-Muslims, who account for about 1% of the province’s population.
Human rights groups have criticized the law, saying it violates international treaties signed by Indonesia protecting the rights of minorities. Indonesia’s national criminal code doesn’t regulate homosexuality.
Monday’s verdict was the fifth time that Aceh has sentenced people to public caning for homosexuality since the Islamic law was implemented.
In February, the same court sentenced two men to public caning up to 85 times for gay sex after neighborhood vigilantes in Banda Aceh suspected them of being gay and broke into their rented room to catch them naked and hugging each other.
In the wake of recent federal policy changes, many transgender, nonbinary, gender-nonconforming, and intersex (TGNCNBI) people are asking: What practical steps can I take to protect myself, minimize risks, and prepare for what’s ahead?
This guide offers practical strategies for travel, documentation, and safety planning in 2025. Whether you’re renewing a passport, preparing for a trip, or deciding how and when to update your documents, this resource is here to support your decisions—with tools to help you stay informed, prepared, and empowered.
Note: This document is for informational purposes only and not legal advice. Consult an attorney licensed in your state for guidance tailored to your circumstances.
[This page was last updated July 2025]
Navigating Travel and Documentation in 2025
Current Recommendations
Valid passports are still usable: Even those with X markers or corrected gender markers remain valid through expiration.
Carry certified copies of supporting documents: For name changes, bring proof when traveling.
Use state-issued IDs for domestic travel: REAL ID-compliant licenses may be more accurate and safer.
Travel Safety and Preparation Tips
TGNCNBI travelers have long faced disproportionate scrutiny. These conditions may worsen under the current policy. To minimize risk:
Check entry rules for your destination: Some countries may have stricter rules or refuse to accept X passports.
Match your ticket to your ID: Book using the exact name and sex listed on the ID you’ll present.
Use your REAL ID for domestic flights: If you haven’t been able to update your passport, consider using a more updated ID for domestic travel.
Bring backup ID: Carry a second form of ID and certified name change/order documents.
Ensure your photo is current: TSA may question IDs that no longer resemble your appearance.
Expect screening variability: You can request a same-gender pat-down or private screening with a witness of the traveler’s choosing.
Prepare for document delays: Passports and supporting documents may be mailed separately.
Additional Considerations
Global Entry and TSA PreCheck: Enrollment with mismatched documents may prevent program participation and create other issues.
Enhanced Driver’s Licenses: Available in select states, these allow land and sea travel to Canada, Mexico, and the Caribbean.
Passport Cards: A lower-cost alternative for land/sea crossings and domestic ID use.
Changing gender markers on birth certificates: Remains governed by state law. The Gender Order does not affect these rules.
Final Thoughts
Navigating identity documentation and travel as a transgender, nonbinary, gender-nonconforming, or intersex person in 2025 can feel overwhelming—but you are not alone. This guide is meant to offer tools, not obligations—use what is helpful and relevant to your personal situation—it is not a one size fits all.
Stay informed, take the precautions that feel right for your circumstances, and lean on your support networks when you need to. Legal challenges are underway, and we’ll continue updating our resources as the landscape changes.
Your identity is valid. Your safety matters. You matter.
Today, the Movement Advancement Project (MAP) and The Trevor Project released a new report that spotlights the harms of conversion “therapy” and details the shifting landscape of efforts to protect LGBTQ young people against this abuse. With the U.S. Supreme Court set to hear a case this fall (Chiles v. Salazar) challenging the legality of these protections, this report offers a timely analysis into the history of these laws, the present landscape, and the importance of continuing to protect LGBTQ youth.
THE PREVALENCE OF CONVERSION “THERAPY” — AND ITS GROWING FOCUS ON TRANSGENDER YOUTH
Conversion “therapy” is a dangerous and discredited practice that attempts to change a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity. These practices have gone by many names and misleading euphemisms over many years, including “ex-gay therapy,” “reparative therapy,” and, more recently, “reintegrative therapy” or “exploratory therapy.” No matter the name, such practices share the fundamental premise that being LGBTQ is wrong, undesirable, and abnormal.
For decades, an unregulated industry masquerading as health care has used these tactics against LGBTQ people and their families—and they continue to do so today. Because these practices are often conducted in relative secret or under the guise of different names, they are difficult to track, and estimates may vary as a result.
This report includes national estimates from recent research and national surveys, which show how conversion “therapy” practices remain widespread today. MAP’s analysis also importantly explains how these harmful practices target transgender people’s gender identity, including transgender youth.
PROTECTING LGBTQ YOUTH FROM THESE HARMFUL PRACTICES
Historically, and continuing today, there has been widespread public support for protecting LGBTQ youth from conversion “therapy,” including across the political spectrum. For example:
As of July 2025, state Republican lawmakers had sponsored or voted in favor of legislation protecting LGBTQ youth from conversion “therapy” at least 682 times.
One-third of existing state protections against conversion “therapy” were enacted by Republican governors.
Laws protecting LGBTQ children from conversion “therapy” have helped raise awareness and ensure that state-licensed therapists and medical providers are providing competent, evidence-based care and are not causing harm to those entrusted to their care.
A LARGER AND COORDINATED ATTACK ON LGBTQ PEOPLE—ESPECIALLY YOUTH
Since 2020, there has been a significant and dramatic escalation in political attacks on the LGBTQ community, with most of these attacks especially targeting LGBTQ youth and transgender people. This has caused startling shifts in the policy landscape, including new and escalating efforts to protect—and in some cases even promote—conversion “therapy.”
For example, in April 2025, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released an anonymously authored report attacking evidence-based, medically necessary care for transgender youth, while repeatedly mentioning conversion “therapy” using the deceptive euphemism “exploratory therapy”. It did so both to promote subjecting transgender young people to these dangerous practices, and to further attack families’ ability to get a transgender child the medical care they need. This report details lawsuits challenging conversion “therapy” laws, as well as recent legislation that aims to push these harmful practices or challenge existing protections at both the state and local level.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND RESOURCES
The scientific research and personal testimonies of LGBTQ people who have been subjected to conversion “therapy” are clear: this is a dangerous and discredited practice—one that the government can and should restrict to protect its citizens.
States and municipalities should protect minors from harmful conversion “therapy” practices.
States and municipalities should fight against efforts to protect or promote conversion “therapy,” including attempted repeals of existing protections.
LGBTQ youth in crisis can contact The Trevor Project by calling 1-866-488-7386; texting “START” to 678-678; or starting a chat at www.thetrevorproject.org/get-help.
All youth deserve love, support, and acceptance. While the law cannot ensure that all youth have these vital needs met, it can protect them from the dangerous and discredited practice of conversion “therapy”—and promote an environment in which every young person knows they are safe, supported, and exactly who they were meant to be.
###
About MAP
The Movement Advancement Project (MAP) provides rigorous research, insight, and analysis that help speed equality and opportunity for all. MAP works to ensure that LGBTQ people and their families can live their lives with dignity, safety, and respect by focusing on three key areas: policy and issue analysis, movement capacity, and effective messaging. MAP’s work also covers a broad range of social justice issues that intersect with the LGBTQ movement, including racial justice, economic justice, and healthcare access. www.mapresearch.org
After two years of living with tuberculosis (TB), 38-year-old Selina Kimuto’s condition is worse than ever. A single mother living in Kibera—Nairobi’s biggest slum—Kimuto had been receiving medication to treat her infection. But in June, her hospital told her that they wouldn’t be able to give her any more until October, due to severe shortages caused by the sudden pull-out of U.S. foreign aid.
Since then, Kimuto’s condition has rapidly deteriorated.
Photo by Brian Otieno Storitellah for Uncloseted Media.
“I’ve really tried, but I can’t do it alone, to wash even my own clothes by myself,” Kimuto told Uncloseted Media. “Even the housework, I’m not doing it by myself. Sometimes I have to call my neighbors to come and help me.”
Kimuto’s medication had been funded in part by the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the U.S. foreign aid program that has been a leading force in the global fight against the HIV/AIDS epidemic since it was launched by President George W. Bush in 2003.
But on day one of President Donald Trump’s second term, the program was hit with a stop-work order and a complete funding freeze on all foreign aid. While limited services have been restored, the State Department is reportedlydrafting a plan to shut down the program in its entirety, with some countries getting as little as two years’ notice before a complete withdrawal of services.
In June, Uncloseted Media reported that a cessation of PEPFAR funding could cause as many as 3 million preventable HIV/AIDS related deaths and 11 million new infections. But the impacts cut much deeper, especially in sub-Saharan Africa and other heavily impacted countries like Haiti and Ukraine.
In Kenya, HIV funding from the U.S. in fiscal year 2024 totaled $307.9 million, equivalent to almost a third of the country’s entire domestic health spending that year. In addition to HIV/AIDS, that money supports TB treatment, women’s and children’s health care, and even the electronic record-keeping for health systems as a whole.
“Health care is dependent on that aspect of the foreign aid to be able to function,” says Dr. Davji Atellah, secretary general of the Kenya Medical Practitioners, Pharmacists and Dentists Union. “A big population is affected, and it means that living conditions must change.”
The Impact on Tuberculosis
Like in many other countries, Kenya’s HIV care is integrated with care for TB because it is a very common infection for people whose immune systems have been weakened by AIDS. PEPFAR funding frequently supported efforts against both epidemics.
Over 23,000 Kenyans are estimated to have died of TB in 2023, with 124,000 cases overall. Dr. Atellah says that there has been a lot of fear in Kimuto’s neighborhood, where TB is particularly prevalent and medications are becoming harder to access.
TB can weaken the lungs, leading to chest pain, weight loss, fever and hemoptysis, or the coughing up of blood. When left untreated, it can be deadly.
Photo by Brian Otieno Storitellah for Uncloseted Media.
Since losing access to the TB medication Rifampicin, Kimuto—who also lives with HIV—now vomits frequently and has been too weak to do her usual work of selling vegetables and cleaning clothes, leaving her short on money, food and rent.
Photo by Brian Otieno Storitellah for Uncloseted Media.
“They told me in the hospital that they were under a shortage of the medicines,” she says. “They were telling us that the drugs were coming from outside the country, so it stopped.”
Anisha Parambi, an OB-GYN at Kenyatta National Hospital in Nairobi, says that Kimuto’s situation is common and that patients who previously could pick up their medication once a month now need to come twice as often as the hospital has been forced to ration supplies.
“Often they’re able to see less patients than they used to see because they don’t have the staff or resources,” Parambi told Uncloseted Media.
Women and Kids in the Crossfire
In addition to TB care, the Trump administration’s cuts are especially affecting women and children. PEPFAR previously supplied 24% of Kenya’s contraceptives, with its disappearance leaving a void which has led to shortages and heightened risks of unintended pregnancies. While some women’s health services, such as cervical cancer screenings, were reauthorized in February, local NGOs have reported that even these services have experienced disruptions and lack of funds.
In 2024, PEPFAR provided care to over 1.3 million survivors of gender-based violence, including rape kits, STI testing and PrEP. Multiple Kenyan sources told Uncloseted Media that these and other social programs had been disrupted since the start of Trump’s second term.
Photo by Brian Otieno Storitellah for Uncloseted Media.
Last year in Kenya, 127 femicides were reported, the most since the country started recording in 2016. The problem has only gotten worse now that gender-based violence programs are closing down: Kenya’s National Police Service reported that 129 women were killed from January to March of this year.
David Oduor knows this better than most. He says his mother suffered abuse and was treated “like an animal,” “beat” and “insulted.” He says the stress caused his mother to suffer from strokes, blood clots and heart failure. She ultimately passed away from complications with the conditions.
He now runs Joy Hope, an orphanage in Kibera, where he says that 90% of the kids he sees live with single moms due to gender-based violence. His organizations have worked to provide counseling for survivors and hold discussions to spread awareness in the community, and he says that the disappearance of aid organizations has made the weight they carry heavier.
Photo by Brian Otieno Storitellah for Uncloseted Media.
At the end of 2024, PEPFAR estimated that they were supporting nutritional, educational and psychosocial services for 6.6 million orphans, vulnerable children and their caregivers in 55 countries
Photo by Brian Otieno Storitellah for Uncloseted Media.
“These children are innocent, so we are just chipping in to help them,” Oduor told Uncloseted Media. “It is really really difficult, and it’s a burden, and we need some people to stand with us.”
The Kenyan government has had its own plan since 2023 to tackle what it calls the “triple threat”: adolescent STI infections, teen pregnancy, and sexual and gender-based violence. While the program had seen some success through providing education and community events for teenagers, one epidemiologist who spoke with Uncloseted Media says that the sudden loss of PEPFAR funding has made it challenging to market itself.
“You can’t bring teenagers together and not have something fun for them—they won’t turn up,” he says. “You have to have a bit of entertainment, or some refreshments, or some skit they can listen to, videos they can watch. All these have been hampered … so we are having challenges with bringing these teenagers together in a forum where … you can actually educate them on how to avert gender-based violence.”
In addition to medication, PEPFAR funding is estimated to have supported and trained 342,000 health workers as of 2024. But the cuts have had devastating effects on employment. In Kenya, roughly 54,000 people lost their jobs just over a month into Trump’s second term due to the U.S. foreign aid freeze.
“In a population of 56 million, when over 50,000 jobs are being lost, then there is a serious problem in terms of the population’s access to health care,” says Dr. Atellah, whose union has been scrambling to get laid-off workers new jobs. “Those who remain in services will be extremely overwhelmed, and therefore there is a need to ensure that there are alternative plans.”
One Kenyan epidemiologist, who specializes in treating especially difficult cases of HIV/AIDS, told Uncloseted Media that he’s been unable to find employment for months after being fired by a health care NGO. He says it’s because the Kenyan government rarely hires specialists, instead focusing on primary care doctors.
“You have to contend with just working as a general doctor, of which the government does not have enough slots for you,” he says. “So you work part-time in a few private health care facilities just to try as much as possible to bring food to the table.”
He says that because HIV and TB specialists like him are getting fired, patients with these conditions are being sent to general providers who aren’t trained to deal with these viruses.
He says this has caused intense disarray: Patients are being prescribed the wrong regimens; difficult and resistant cases are going unnoticed; people are falling out of care; and higher viral loads are contributing to more deaths.
“There’s no individualized care anymore, so the patients are running away from care, and some of them, if they stop taking their medication, they get sick at home,” he says.
The epidemiologist adds that it’s hard to know the scale of the epidemics because shortages and service reductions have limited the number of people who can get tested, often excluding the worst cases and thus skewing the data.
In addition, PEPFAR programs typically use their own information systems to manage health care data. But because these record-keeping systems are managed by the U.S., disruptions to PEPFAR are causing countries to lose access.
That happened in Kenya in March, when government officials reported that they had lost access to several health information systems, including those that track the spread of infectious diseases, vaccine stocks and even patients’ electronic health records. While the cloud storage for the systems has been restored, funding cuts have made it unreliable, with some facilities resorting to using paper documents.
Without good record keeping, “You’re blindly treating the patient, you don’t know the challenges, you’re starting from afresh,” says the epidemiologist. “The quality of care you’re going to offer the client is going to be heavily affected.”
Dr. Atellah says the Kenyan government may have to start developing a new system—a very real risk given that the State Department plans to defund billions of dollars in electronic record keeping despite the fact that, by their own admission, these systems “are in nearly every case unlikely to be financially sustained by the country government.”
Dr. Atellah says that the Trump administration’s removal of aid is disastrous for Kenya. He adds that Kenya’s dependency on the U.S. is so intense and the country’s government has been relatively slow and ineffective in their response, which exposes the flaws and corruption in their health system as a whole.
He says the Kenyan government should put more support into public health, PEPFAR or not, noting that the pilferage of public funds is one reason this isn’t happening.
“The Trump administration has said ‘America first,’ and therefore the time has come for the [Kenyan] government to put Kenya first,” says Dr. Atellah. “And there’s no possibility to do that if the access to health care for the over 2 million [people] living with HIV and over 100,000 people living with TB are not covered.”
Despite this, Dr. Atellah and the experts who spoke with Uncloseted Media agree that the Trump administration’s sudden and rapid cessation of aid is not a solution. In April, a group of 18 global public health experts published a policy proposaladvocating for a five-year plan to transition the leadership on the fight against HIV from the U.S. to the most impacted countries’ governments. But according to the State Department’s plans, PEPFAR would end in most countries in two to four years.
Photo by Brian Otieno Storitellah for Uncloseted Media.
The sudden cuts continue to be felt by Selina Kimuto in the Kibera Slums, whose condition is deteriorating because she can no longer access the appropriate amount of medication that can help her manage her TB, leaving her unemployed and struggling financially, physically and emotionally.
“The place that I stay right now, I’m really struggling to pay my rentals—when I get it, I try to at least pay it, but most of the time I don’t get it, so all I’m asking for is for you to help me.”
If objective, nonpartisan, rigorous, LGBTQ-focused journalism is important to you, please consider making a tax-deductible donation through our fiscal sponsor, Resource Impact, by clicking this button:
Under the Trump administration, the EEOC has abandoned trans workers, says the suit, in which FreeState Justice is represented by Democracy Forward and the National Women’s Law Center. It was filed in U.S. District Court in Maryland and names the EEOC and Acting Chair Andrea Lucas as defendants.
The EEOC, established in 1965 by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, is tasked with investigating all forms of workplace bias. Filing a discrimination complaint with the EEOC is a precondition to filing a federal employment discrimination lawsuit. “The EEOC, in turn, serves those charges on the employers, investigates the charges, resolves matters through conciliation or settlement where possible, and, in some circumstances, files lawsuits in federal court to vindicate the charging parties and advance the public interest,” the suit notes.
“But the EEOC has now abdicated this core duty,” it continues. “In derogation of its statutory and constitutional obligations, the EEOC has foreclosed transgenderworkers from the full set of Title VII-mandated charge-investigation and other enforcement protections that all other charging parties enjoy.” The suit calls current EEOC policy a “Trans Exclusion Policy.”
Soon after Donald Trump became president, the EEOC moved to dismiss the employment discrimination complaints it had brought on behalf of trans people, according to the suit. “The cases that the EEOC sought to abandon concerned transgender workers who had been subjected to egregious conditions in the workplace: slurs and grossly derogatory statements, graphic sexual comments and unwanted physical touching, misgendering, unfavorable shift changes, and termination after disclosing their gender identity — often in combination,” the complaint says.
In April, the commission “directed that all charges of gender-identity discrimination be categorically classified as meritless and suitable for dismissal,” it goes on. Now it claims “to accept for processing only certain kinds of charges brought by transgender charging parties—standalone hiring, firing, and promotion claims — but no others,” the suit says.
The EEOC has interpreted Title VII’s ban on sex discrimination as encompassing gender identity and sexual orientation discrimination since at least 2011, the complaint says. The U.S. Supreme Court interpreted Title VII that way in Bostock v. Clayton County in 2020. “In other words, Bostock cemented protections for LGBTQ+ workers that the EEOC had already recognized for years,” the suit notes. But now, in keeping with the Trump administration’s denial that trans people exist, Lucas is ignoring gender identity discrimination, the document continues.
Before the EEOC became anti-trans under the Trump administration, Freestate Justice “typically advised clients wishing to file employment-discrimination charges to file with the EEOC rather than the Maryland Commission on Civil Rights,” the suit says, as “the EEOC provides charging parties with more information and engages in more resolutions of matters” than the state body. Now FreeState Justice refers clients to the Maryland commission, whose “charge-investigation process is not an equal substitute for the EEOC’s,” according to the complaint.
The Maryland commission has a broader mission than the EEOC — it investigates charges of discrimination in housing, public accommodations, and other area, not just employment — and it may soon stop investigating gender identity discrimination because the EEOC will not reimburse it for this work.
The EEOC’s “Trans Exclusion Policy” violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the equal protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and the Administrative Procedure Act, the suit alleges. It asks for the court to order the EEOC to end this policy and award FreeState Justice costs, attorneys’ fees, and other appropriate compensation.
“Policies like the EEOC’s undermine the law and endanger people. They force LGBTQI+ people and other marginalized communities to choose between their job and being true to who they are,” Lauren Pruitt, legal Director at FreeState Justice, said in a press release. “These harms show up in the daily lives of the communities we serve through our legal work, who are being pushed further into the margins. We are fighting back because no one should have to live in fear of discrimination or retribution just to go to work.”
“For over 60 years, the EEOC’s mandate has been to protect workers from discrimination, not to pick and choose who is deemed worthy of protection based on political interference,” added Skye Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward. “The Trump-Vance administration’s unlawful effort to erase protections for transgender people is cruel, and a violation of the law and the Constitution. We are honored to be alongside our partners and clients to hold this administration accountable and ensure every worker is protected under the law.”
“Instead of serving its critical role to prevent discrimination in the workplace, the EEOC, under Andrea Lucas’ leadership, is actually promoting discrimination,” said Gaylynn Burroughs, vice president for education and workplace justice at the National Women’s Law Center. “Transgender workers deserve to be protected against harassment, and the EEOC is obligated to do so under law. But the Trump administration seems hellbent on bullying transgender people in every possible way and ensuring that they are pushed out of all forms of public life, including their workplaces, so we’re taking the administration to court.”
Earlier this year, 16-year-old AB Hernandez became the target of nationwide hate and harassment when the president of a local school board publicly doxxed the track and field athlete and outed her as transgender. Right-wing activists misgendered her and called her mom “evil;” swarms of adults showed up to heckle her at games; Charlie Kirk pushed state governor Gavin Newsom to condemn her; and President Donald Trump threatened to withhold federal funding from California over her participation.
While transgender athletes are very rare, this type of harassment towards them is playing out across the country and internationally. A trans girl was harassedat a soccer game in Bow, New Hampshire, by adult protestors wearing XX/XY armbands, representing an anti-trans sports clothing brand. And in British Columbia, a 9-year-old cis girl was accosted by a grown man who accused her of being trans and demanded that she prove her sex to him.
While research into the relative athletic capabilities of trans and cis women is ongoing, far-right groups, including the Alliance Defending Freedom and the Leadership Institute, have been putting hate before science to turn the public against trans athletes since at least 2014. And it’s working.
Laws, rules or regulations currently ban trans athletes from competing in sports consistent with their gender identity in 29 states, with 21 beginning the ban in kindergarten. The majority-conservative Supreme Court announcedthis month that it’ll be taking on the question of the constitutionality of the bans. Meanwhile, the federal government is pressuringstates without bans to change their policies in compliance with a Trump executive order that attempts to institute a nationwide ban.
Trump signs an executive order calling for bans on trans women and girls from women’s sports. Photo by: The White House.
These bans have been successful in part because of a toxic and ruthless ecosystem of far-right influencers, like Riley Gaines, who have formed entire careers around attacking trans athletes by prioritizing hate and misinformation.
“So much of what we see … just seems like it’s wrapped up in really hateful and negative messages that aren’t good for anyone,” says Mary Fry, a professor of sport and exercise psychology at the University of Kansas. “We’re creating issues where maybe we don’t need to.”
Harassment and Mental Health
Grace McKenzie has been deeply affected by these hate campaigns. A lifelong athlete, McKenzie has stayed healthy by playing multiple sports where she’s met “amazing people.” Shortly after she transitioned in 2018, she was thrilled when she was invited to join a women’s rugby team at the afterparty of a Lesbians Who Tech conference.
Grace McKenzie. Photo courtesy of McKenzie.
“Rugby became my home, it was my first queer community, it was the space where I really discovered my own womanhood,” McKenzie told Uncloseted Media. “I could be the sometimes-masculine, soft-feminine person who play[s] rugby and loves sports.”
But that started to change in 2019, when McKenzie and others on her team started to hear rumors that World Rugby was considering a ban on trans athletes. Fearing the loss of her community, she started a petition that racked up 25,000 signatures—but it wasn’t enough, and the ban took effect in 2020.
As anti-trans rhetoric in sports has ramped up, McKenzie says she’s had soul-crushing breakdowns that have left her “sobbing uncontrollably and unconsolably.”
“It would be these waves of such intense despair and rage—it was like going through grief for five years,” she says. “I have to wake up every single day and read about another state or another group of people who say that they don’t want me to exist.”
While McKenzie says she’s found the strength to keep playing where she can, sports psychologist Erin Ayala has seen clients leave sports altogether due to the hate toward trans athletes.
“It can be really difficult when they feel like they’re doing everything right … and they still don’t belong,” says Ayala, the founder of the Minnesota-based Skadi Sport Psychology, a therapy clinic for competitive athletes. “Depression can be really high. They don’t have the strength to keep fighting to show up. And then that can further damage their mental health because they’re not getting the exercise and that sense of social support and community.”
That was the story of Andraya Yearwood, who made national headlines in high school when she and another trans girl placed first and second in Connecticut’s high school track competitions. The vitriol directed at her was intense: Parents circulated petitions to have her banned; crowds cheered for her disqualification; the anti-LGBTQ hate group Alliance Defending Freedom launched a lawsuit against the state for letting her play; and she faced a torrent of transphobic and racist harassment.
“It’s a very shitty experience,” Yearwood, now 23, told Uncloseted Media.
Fearing more harassment, she quit running in college.
“I understood that collegiate athletics is on a much larger and much more visible scale. … I just didn’t want to go through all that again for the next four years,” she says. “Track obviously meant a lot to me, and to have to let that go was difficult.”
It’s understandable that Yearwood and other trans athletes struggle when they have to ditch their favorite sport. A litany of research demonstrates that playing sports fosters camaraderie and teamwork and improves mental and physical health. Since trans people disproportionately struggle from poor mental health, social isolation and suicidality, these benefits can be especially crucial.
“In some of these cases, kids have been participating with a peer group for years, and then rules were made and all of a sudden they’re pulled away,” says Fry. “It’s a hard world to be a trans individual in, so it’d be easy to feel lonely and separated.”
Caught in the Crossfire
The anti-trans attacks in sports are also affecting cis women. Ayala, a competitive cyclist, remembers one race where she and her trans friend both made the podium. When photos of the event were posted on Facebook, people accused her of being trans, and she was added to a “list of males who have competed in female sports” maintained by Save Women’s Sports.
Ayala isn’t alone. Numerous cis female athletes have been “transvestigated,” or accused of being trans, including Serena Williams and Brittney Griner. During the 2024 Paris Olympics, Donald Trump and Elon Musk publicly accused Algerian boxer Imane Khelif of being trans after her gold medal win, as part of a wave of online hate against her. She would later file a cyberbullying complaint against Musk’s X.
While women of all races have been targeted, Black women have faced harsher scrutiny due to stereotypes that portray them as more masculine.
Yearwood remembers posts that would fixate on her muscle definition and compare her to LeBron James.
“I think that is attributed to the overall hyper-masculinization and de-feminization of Black women, and I know that’s a lot more prevalent for Black trans women,” she says. “It made it easier to come for us in the way that they did.”
Joanna Harper, a post-doctoral scholar at Oregon Health & Science University and one of the world’s leading researchers on the subject, says that the jury is still out on whether the differences in athletic performance between trans and cis women are significant enough to warrant policy changes.
“People want simple solutions, they want things to be black and white, they want good guys and bad guys,” Harper says, adding that the loudest voices against trans women’s participation do not actually care about what the science says.
“This idea that trans women are bigger than cis women, therefore it can’t be fair, is a very simple idea, and so it is definitely one that people who want to create trans people as villains have pushed.”
Even Harper herself has been the victim of the far-right’s anti-trans attacks. Earlier this year, she was featured in a New York Times article where she discussed a study she was working on with funding from Nike into the effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on adolescents’ athletic performance.
Riley Gaines and OutKick founder Clay Travis attack Harper’s study on X.
“That Nike chose to fund a study on trans athletes doesn’t actually say that they’re supporting trans athletes. They’re merely supporting research looking into the capabilities of trans athletes,” Harper says. “You don’t know what the research will show until you get the data … but the haters don’t want any data coming out that doesn’t support what they want to say.”
Harper says this anti-trans fervor and HRT bans are making it more difficult to conduct studies in the first place.
And while the far-right argues that they are “protecting women’s sports” in their war on trans athletes, multiple athletes and experts told Uncloseted Media that this distracts from bigger issues in women’s sports, including sexualharassment by coaches and a lack of funding.
“If the real goal was to help women’s sports, they would try to increase funding [and] support for athletes,” says Harper, noting that women’s sports receive half as much money as men’s sports at the Division I collegiate level. “But that’s not what they’re doing, and it becomes pretty evident the real motivation behind these people.”
Since Trump’s reelection, Grace McKenzie has somewhat resigned herself to the likelihood of attacks on trans people getting worse. Despite this, she finds hope in building community with other trans athletes, such as the New York City-based trans basketball league Basketdolls.
“If that’s the legacy that [the anti-trans movement] wants to leave behind, good for them,” McKenzie says. “Our legacy is going to be one about hope, and collective solidarity, and mutual aid, and I would much rather be on that side of the fence.”
Meanwhile, Fry remains hopeful that conflicts can be resolved and that trans people may be able to find a place in sports over time.
“If we could all have more positive conversations and not create such a hateful environment around this issue, it would just benefit everyone.”
If objective, nonpartisan, rigorous, LGBTQ-focused journalism is important to you, please consider making a tax-deductible donation through our fiscal sponsor, Resource Impact, by clicking this button:
The Department of Homeland Security will update visa policies to prevent transgender women from traveling to the U.S. to participate in elite women’s sporting events.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services issued guidance Monday intended to bar trans women athletes from obtaining “extraordinary ability” visas to compete in female sports, as was first reported by the conservative news website The Daily Wire. The guidance builds off of an executive order President Doanld Trump issued during the early weeks of his presidency that intended to bar trans women from competing in female sports.
The guidance doesn’t use the word transgender or refer to trans women, but rather refers to “male athletes” who seek to compete in women’s sports.
Matthew Tragesser, a spokesperson for USCIS, said in a statement that the agency is “closing the loophole for foreign male athletes whose only chance at winning elite sports is to change their gender identity and leverage their biological advantages against women.”
“It’s a matter of safety, fairness, respect, and truth that only female athletes receive a visa to come to the U.S. to participate in women’s sports,” Tragesser said in the statement. “The Trump Administration is standing up for the silent majority who’ve long been victims of leftist policies that defy common sense.”
The policy update applies to three visa categories for individuals who possess “extraordinary ability” in science, art, education, business or athletics. It also affects national interest waivers, which allow applicants to self-petition to waive the labor certification for a green card if they can show that their work serves the national interest.
The updated guidance clarifies that USCIS “considers the fact that a male athlete has been competing against women as a negative factor” in determining whether they are among the top in the sport.
The guidance adds that it is not in the national interest of the U.S. to waive the labor certification requirement for trans women athletes “whose proposed endeavor is to compete in women’s sports.”
USCIS did not respond to a request for comment regarding how many people could be affected by the new policy or whether there are recent examples of trans female athletes traveling to the U.S. under the affected visa categories.
Within the National Collegiate Athletic Association, the nonprofit group that regulates college athletics, about 25,000 international student athletes compete in NCAA sports out of the more than 500,000 total who compete each year, according to the association. While it’s unclear how many NCAA athletes are trans, the association’s president, Charlie Baker, told a Senate committee in December that he is aware of fewer than 10.
The USCIS policy update may have affected athletes who planned to travel to Los Angeles for the 2028 Summer Olympics; however, the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee barred trans women from competing in female sports last month.
Only a handful of trans athletes have ever competed in the Olympics. Weightlifter Laurel Hubbard became the first out trans athlete to compete in the Olympics in the Tokyo Games in 2021, though she did not medal. American skateboarder Alana Smith and Canadian soccer star Quinn also competed in the Tokyo Games, and Quinn became the first nonbinary and trans athlete to ever medal when their team won gold that year.
LinkedIn, the popular professional networking platform, has quietly stripped explicit protections for transgender and nonwhite users from its English-language hate speech rules, repeating a playbook now familiar to LGBTQ+ advocates tracking the rollback of content safeguards across major social mediaplatforms.
The changes, first flagged by the nonprofit Open Terms Archive and independently confirmed by The Advocate, involve edits to LinkedIn’s Professional Community Policies, specifically the “Hateful and Derogatory Content” and “Harassment and Abusive Content” sections. In both, references to protections for transgender people and people of color were either weakened or removed entirely.
Before Monday, the site’s “Hateful and Derogatory Content” page included a line explicitly prohibiting the “misgendering or deadnaming of transgender individuals” as an example of hate speech. That language has now been deleted. The same page still states that LinkedIn prohibits content that “attacks, denigrates, intimidates, dehumanizes, incites or threatens hatred” against individuals based on characteristics including gender identity and race. But misgendering and deadnaming, terms that refer to deliberately using the wrong name or pronouns for a transgender person, are no longer explicitly prohibited.
The company also edited its “Harassment and Abusive Content” section. In the previous version, LinkedIn made clear that “content that negatively targets others on the basis of inherent traits, like race or gender identity,” would be enforced under its hate speech rules. That language has now been changed to exclude those specific attributes, referencing only “inherent traits” without further definition. The page still prohibits behaviors such as doxxing, trolling, and comparing people to hate groups, and includes a new reference to “perceived gender” in the context of disparaging appearance, but makes no mention of transgender identity or expression.
Archived versions show the deleted language was still live on the site as recently as Monday, and had been in place since at least April 2023. No announcement accompanied the edits, which are not reflected in LinkedIn’s Trust and Safety blog or other transparency channels.
After an inquiry from The Advocate, a LinkedIn spokesperson initially defended the platform’s stance against identity-based abuse, asserting that “We regularly update our policies. Personal attacks, intimidation or hate speech toward anyone based on their identity, including misgendering, violates our harassment policy and is not allowed on our platform.”
Less than an hour later, the company asked to revise that statement, removing the phrase “hate speech” and instead mirroring the new policy language: “Personal attacks or intimidation toward anyone based on their identity, including misgendering, violates our harassment policy and is not allowed on our platform.”
When asked to clarify whether LinkedIn’s new wording allows certain forms of dehumanizing or hateful language to go unaddressed, a second company spokesperson said “neither” and pointed to LinkedIn’s “Hateful and Derogatory Content” page.
LinkedIn’s changes come at a time when the Trump administration continues its full-scale rollback of LGBTQ+ rights. Within hours of his second inauguration in January, President Donald Trump signed an executive order instructing all federal agencies to define sex and gender based on birth assignment. Since then, federal departments have removed protections for trans people across health care, education, the military, and immigration services.
The LGBTQ+ media nonprofit GLAAD condemned the move as “an overt anti-LGBTQ+ shift” that mirrors troubling developments at Meta and YouTube under the influence of regulatory and political pressure of the second Trump administration. The revision removes key clarity at a time when targeted abuse against transgender people is surging.
“It’s the latest in a disturbing trend,” a GLAAD spokesperson told The Advocate. “Following Meta and YouTube earlier this year, yet another social media company is choosing to adopt cowardly business practices to try to appease anti-LGBTQ political ideologues at the expense of user safety.”
According to GLAAD’s 2025 Social Media Safety Index, released in May, major tech platforms are failing LGBTQ+ users, and in some cases, actively endangering them. The report, which didn’t include LinkedIn, shows protections for LGBTQ+ people online have eroded dramatically over the past year, especially on platforms owned by Meta and Google. Every company surveyed received a failing grade, with TikTok scoring highest at just 56 out of 100 and X (formerly Twitter) lowest at 30.
“Targeted misgendering and deadnaming are among the most frequent and insidious forms of anti-trans hate online,” the GLAAD spokesperson said.
The policy rollback at LinkedIn closely echoes the arc of changes at Meta, the parent company of Instagram, Facebook, and Threads. In January, The Advocatereported that Meta had rewritten its “Hateful Conduct” policies to allow posts that previously would have been banned, so long as they are framed as “political or religious” discourse. The company’s new rules explicitly permit content excluding trans and gay people from restrooms, sports, and employment, and even allow for content portraying LGBTQ+ identities as “abnormal” or mentally ill.
In April, The Advocatereported that YouTube removed “gender identity and expression” from its hate speech policy. The company called the deletion a “copy edit” but never restored the language or explained the rationale.
“As transgender and nonbinary people face escalating attacks and extreme dehumanizing rhetoric from the right, including from political leaders and government agencies, social media platforms have a clear responsibility to uphold basic protections,” the GLAAD spokesperson said. “Instead, LinkedIn is aligning with the far-right Project 2025, which calls for targeting ‘woke culture warriors … start[ing] with deleting the terms sexual orientation and gender identity…’”
Microsoft, which owns LinkedIn, prominently touts its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion in annual reports and public campaigns. Its 2024 Global Diversity & Inclusion Report declares, “Empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more.” The company’s Chief Diversity Officer emphasizes the importance of creating a “thriving organization” rooted in “differing perspectives” and inclusive behavior.
When The Advocate initially asked Microsoft to comment on LinkedIn’s removal of the transgender protections, the company did not answer questions. A spokesperson confirmed that they were “looking into this.” Later, the spokesperson pointed to LinkedIn’s response and said, “Microsoft doesn’t have anything further to share.”
“Hate speech policies are a reflection of a company’s values,” the GLAAD spokesperson told The Advocate. “If LinkedIn believes that transgender and nonbinary people should be protected from hate and harassment, they should clearly state this without resorting to confusing doublespeak.”