• News
    • Local
    • San Francisco
    • State
    • National
    • International
  • Perspectives
    • Opinions
    • Columns
    • Sports
  • Features
    • HIV & AIDS
    • Health
    • Seniors
    • Spirituality
    • Transgender / Transsexual
    • Real Estate
    • Everybody’s Business
    • Travel
    • Fitness
  • Arts & Entertainment
    • Theatre
    • Music
    • Books
    • Television
    • Film
  • Newspaper
    • Contact
    • Advertising Info
We The People
Voice of the LGBTQIA+ Community in the North Bay
  • News
    • Local
    • San Francisco
    • State
    • National
    • International
  • Perspectives
    • Opinions
    • Columns
    • Sports
  • Features
    • HIV & AIDS
    • Health
    • Seniors
    • Spirituality
    • Transgender / Transsexual
    • Real Estate
    • Everybody’s Business
    • Travel
    • Fitness
  • Arts & Entertainment
    • Theatre
    • Music
    • Books
    • Television
    • Film

National/ News/ Top Stories

At Judiciary Hearing, Kamala Harris Presses Judicial Nominees on LGBTQ and Women’s Rights

Gary Carnivele January 13, 2018

Kamala Harris

At her first hearing as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, U.S. Senator Kamala D. Harris pressed a judicial nominee for the District of Utah, Howard Nielson Jr., on his history of advocating against the rights of LGBTQ Americans. Previously, Nielson represented the proponents of California Proposition 8, a 2008 ballot measure that outlawed same sex marriages. After he lost the case, Nielson then tried to reverse the outcome by arguing that the judge should have recused himself due to the judge’s sexual orientation.

“I was Attorney General of California during this time and I opposed the motion to remove Judge Vaughn Walker,” Harris said. “I wrote in my brief, ‘As many judges have recognized however, this is a distinction without a difference. Faced with similarly nuanced challenges, courts have seen such recusal requests for what they really are: a thinly veiled attempt to disqualify judges based on their race, gender, religious affiliation, or in this case sexual orientation.’ I stand by those words.”

Harris continued, “As Judge Higginbotham noted over 30 years ago, who is an African-American judge, ‘It would be a tragic day for the nation and the judiciary if a myopic vision of the judge’s role should prevail. A vision that requires judges to refrain from participating in their churches, in their non-political community affairs, in their universities. So long as Jewish judges preside over matters where Jewish and gentile litigants disagree, so long as Protestant judges preside over matters where Protestants and Catholics disagree, so long as white judges preside over matters where white and black litigants disagree, I will preside over matters where black and white litigants disagree.”

Harris also questioned the judicial nominee for the United States Fifth Circuit, Kurt Engelhardt, on a case in which he ruled against a woman who was fired for taking medically mandated leave from work due to complications that arose from her pregnancy.

Related Posts

National /

LGBTQ+ suicide helpline inundated with harassment from conservatives, staff say

News /

Queer Families and All Caregivers Can Help Shape the Future of Home Visiting Services in Sonoma County

Top Stories /

Grindr joins major public health push to distribute free at-home HIV tests

‹ All EU Nations Must Recognize Gay Spouses, Says European Court Official › Deal Reached In Transgender Case Seeking Bathroom Access

Back to Top

  • News
  • Perspectives
  • Features
  • Arts & Entertainment
  • Newspaper
© We The People 2023
Powered by WordPress • Themify WordPress Themes