The Supreme Court in Nepal has issued an interim order enabling the registration of same-sex marriages, a move which has been described as a “significant step towards marriage equality” in the country.
The interim order was issued by the Supreme Court on Wednesday (28 June), asking the government to establish a separate register of marriages for same-sex couples in the country, the Associated Press (AP) reported.
The US embassy in Nepal wrote on Twitter: “This decision is a significant step towards marriage equality and recognition in Nepal that marriage is a fundamental right.
“With the recognition of full marriage equality, Nepal will continue to be a leader in protecting all citizens against discrimination.”
While same-sex marriage is still not yet fully legal in Nepal, activists have said that the move is “very significant” for same-sex couples and “third gender” people. “Third gender” people are officially recognised in Nepal as of 2007, and can list their gender on ID including passports. The gender has been included in Nepal’s census since 2021.
“This is a very significant development, as same-sex as well as third genders and their partners can register their marriages. They will be entitled to the same rights as heterosexual couples,” LGBTQ+ rights activist and former parliamentarian Sunil Babu Pant said.
“Parliament may take a while to pass the marriage equality law, but this order gives a practical solution to members of the sexual and gender minority communities who wish to register their marriage legally.”
Reveller takes part in a Pride parade in Kathmandu, Nepal on 10 June 2023. (Sanjit Pariyar/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Couple Surendra Pandey and Maya Gurung told AP that they married in a Hindu ceremony six years ago. However, their marriage is not legally binding. They told the outlet that they were “relieved” to finally be able to register their marriage.
Gurung said: “I am overwhelmed with joy because of this decision and it is a day of commemoration for our community.
“This court ruling has established that we are equal citizens of this country.”
The mayor of a California city in the greater Los Angeles metropolitan area has drawn criticism from citizens and business leaders after refusing to issue a proclamation recognizing June as Pride Month and describing LGBTQ+ identity as a “choice of lifestyle.”
As the Los Angeles Blade reports, 2023 was the first year since 2014 that the city of Torrance, California did not issue a Pride Month proclamation. While the city reportedly does not sponsor Pride events or fly the Pride flag over its city hall, former mayor Patrick Furey did issue the proclamations beginning in 2014.
But this year, Mayor George Chen, who was elected in 2022 after Furey retired, opted to break with that tradition, frustrating local LGBTQ+ residents and business owners who say the city has seen an uptick in hostility toward the queer community. Last year, Pride decorations outside local businesses were torn down, according to the Daily Breeze.
Early last month, the paper reported that Chen turned down a request to issue the annual Pride Month proclamation. The mayor said that his decision was not meant to be a public condemnation of the LGBTQ+ community.
“To me, it was a proclamation request,” Chen told the Daily Breeze in early June. “I denied the proclamation request because this is a certain choice of lifestyle for some people, and I respect each person’s personal choice. It does not rise to a proclamation.”
However, the choice to play pickleball apparently does rise to that level; earlier this year, Chen issued a proclamation declaring April National Pickleball Month, the L.A. Bladenotes.
Frustrated with the mayor’s decision and last year’s vandalism, members of the Downtown Torrance Association (DTA) reportedly came up with a plan to hang rainbow Pride banners on the downtown business district’s light poles, where vandals cannot reach them. The DTA also drafted its own Pride Month proclamation, which was ratified by all 50 of the DTA’s member businesses, the L.A. Blade reported.
Members of the organization read the proclamation aloud during a June 6 city council meeting. But according to the Daily Breeze, the mayor’s office has the right to decline any proclamation request made by a Torrance resident, per city policy. Chen declined the DTA’s request.
The L.A. Blade reports that the morning after the meeting, security cameras outside one downtown business captured city officials removing the DTA’s Pride banners. At a subsequent meeting after business owners rehung the banners, city representatives reportedly told DTA members that they could face misdemeanor charges if they did not remove them.
Additionally, Chen and the Torrance city council have reportedly failed to issue formal statements condemning anti-LGBTQ+ graffiti that began appearing on city bridges.
The situation has been devastating for members of the local LGBTQ+ community and their allies.
“I’m seeing people in my community losing hope,” Adam Schwartz told the L.A. Blade. “It’s destroyed people’s trust in the city. A lot of people can hear this and go, ‘Oh, Torrance is such a backward, bigoted place,’ and that hurts everyone in Torrance.”
“It’s frustrating for me to see that I’m still not really welcome,” said Silas Quinn, a transgender Torrance native who moved back to the city last year. “I’m still not really what Torrance wants to be a part of their community.”
But Isabel (Douvan) Schwartz, who helped draft the DTA’s proclamation, remained defiant. “This will not stop the Downtown Torrance Association from finding other ways to celebrate Pride,” she told the L.A. Blade. “Next year, we will find another way to celebrate.”
A 24-year-old man has been charged in connection with the stabbing of a university professor and two students during a gender studies lecture in Canada, in what police say was a “hate-motivated incident”.
Geovanny Villalba-Aleman, an international student who had recently graduated from Waterloo University in Ontario, is alleged to have carried out the “planned and targeted” attack “motivated by hate related to gender expression and gender identity”, police said in a press release.
About 40 students were attending the class on Wednesday (28 June) when a man stabbedthe 38-year-old professor, a 20-year-old woman and a 19-year-old man, police said.
The victims sustained serious but not life-threatening injuries.
Villalba-Aleman has since been charged with aggravated assault, assault with a weapon, possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose, and mischief under $5,000.
“It is both sad and disturbing that this incident has occurred during Pride month,” Waterloo regional police service chief Mark Crowell said at a press conference on Thursday (29 June).
“We hope that this incident does not diminish from these celebrations but, instead, encourages us all to come together to continue to celebrate and inspire love over hate.”
In a statement on Twitter, the president of the university, Vivek Goel, said that the campus will continue to fly Pride and Two-Spirit flags until the end of July in response to the “hate-filled” attack.
“Professor Katy Fulfer and two students in her gender studies course were attacked because they were exploring society and gender,” Goel wrote.
“That this hate-filled attack, due to gender expression and identity, happened at the end of Pride month is even more painful.
“Our world is increasingly polarised and there are those who try to intimidate the 2SLGBTQIA+ community. They want us to be afraid – afraid to learn, afraid to share, afraid to speak our truths.
“We won’t let this deter us from proclaiming our values of inclusion and openness.”
Justin Trudeau, Canada’s prime minister, tweeted that he strongly condemned the “despicable” and “vile” incident.
Food For Thought’s food drive program is growing, and we need YOU to help collect food donations!
So far this year, we have already collected over 13,500 food items at food drives for our neighbors in need! If you can jump in the mix to TRY ON A FOOD DRIVE it would be most excellent to have your help. We’ve got to keep the food rolling in through the Summer too!
I will be on site with bells on to welcome, orient, and train 1st-time food drive volunteers at:
Saturday, July 8th:
Windsor Oliver’s training shifts 12:30pm-3pm and 3pm-5pm
Saturday, July 15th:
Mendocino Ave Safeway– 10am-12:30pm, 12:30pm-3pm, AND 3pm-5pm
Wednesday, July 19th:
Montecito Oliver’s–10-12:30pm & 3pm-5pm
With the 4th on its way, we’ll blink and July 8th will be upon us…please do grab a shift TODAY! Hope to hear from you soon.
Thank you, thank you!”
For more information about signing up for an orientation shift,
Thursday, July 13, 2023 GLBT Historical Society Museum 4127 18th Street San Francisco, CA 941147:00 PM | General Reception 7:30 PM | Remarks by curator Julia RosenzweigTickets are $10.00 or free for members. Click here to reserve your ticket.
About the ExhibitionThe landscape of lesbian cartoons in the 1990s was small yet vibrant; full of passion, satire, self-deprecation, and deep-cutting political and social commentary. Publishing these cartoons in the early years of Curve magazine (which was named Deneuvemagazine between 1991-1995) was a natural fit, aligning with the pivotal lesbian publication’s cheeky voice and journalistic integrity, and enhancing both the aesthetics of the pages and its witty content. In the 1990s, these alternative artists had few platforms to publish their voices and their art. Curve magazine is proud to have been at the forefront of amplifying these marginalized voices and allowing them to further spread lesbian representation, culture, and humor.Artists showcased in this exhibit include Kris Kovick, Jennifer Camper, Hope Barrett, Rhonda Dicksion, Alison Bechdel, Cari Campbell, Andrea Natalie, Joan Hilty, Paige Braddock, Debby Earthdaughter, Diane DiMassa, Fish, Elizabeth Watasin, and Roberta Gregory.
Max Adomat considers themself fortunate. Adomat, 26, who is nonbinary and uses they/them pronouns, has been on a steady regimen of feminizing hormones for the last six years. They also began their gender transition in New Jersey, a progressive state where clinics offering transition-related medical care are commonplace, and name changes are confidential, they said.
But Adomat still found themself obtaining and self-administering gender-affirming hormones from unregulated, and oftentimes illegal, overseas online pharmacies instead of licensed medical offices. The reason, Adomat said, was a lack of both health insurance and money: When they began transitioning, their low-paying job in the food service industry did not provide insurance, and they were unable to afford the steep cost of transition-related care — including hormone therapy and routine doctors appointments — without it.
Though they knew the risks — which, without supervised care, can include higher chances of blood clots, heart attacks and some cancers — Adomat felt their window for a successful transition was closing, they said.
“I just sort of decided, ‘I’m going to do it, and if and when I can see a doctor somewhere down the road, sure, but I would rather do it now and face those consequences,’” they recalled, adding that their alternative at the time was to continue to “live miserably.”
Max Adomat, 26, has been on a steady regimen of feminizing hormones for the last six years.Max Adomat
Interviews with health care providers and lawyers, as well as transgender individuals who use or have used a do-it-yourself approach to transitioning, suggest the reasons people opt for the nonprescription and self-administration route vary and include cost savings, health care accessibility, medical discrimination, and the desire to choose which hormones and dosages are involved in the process.
A DIY approach, however, is not without its health and legal risks. Despite the risks, some experts predict this approach will become even more common given the current political climate: Nearly 20states have already passed laws blocking access to gender-affirming care for minors, and other states have proposed measures that would restrict this type of care for some adults.
Out of pocket costs
A monthly supply of common feminizing hormones — including estrogen and anti-androgens — can cost patients up to $115, according to GoodRx, which tracks U.S. drug prices. Masculinizing hormones, including injectable testosterone, are typically cheaper, costing about $40 to $90 a month. Through unregulated online pharmacies, however, a monthly supply of these feminizing and masculinizing hormones can be purchased for as low as $8, plus shipping.
While price sensitivity to health care costs is not unique to transgender people, this community faces higher rates of economic hardship and poverty, with 1 in 3 trans adults reporting an annual household income under $25,000, according to a 2021 report from the liberal think tank Center for American Progress.
Samme Qandil, 28, was on a medically supervised hormone regimen for three years, but when she landed a new job and her health insurance changed, she was unable to pay her new provider’s $300 copay for a six-week supply of injectable hormones. Faced with both high copay fees and a nationwide shortage of injectable estrogen, she decided to begin purchasing her hormones from an unregulated online pharmacy recommended by her friends.
While Qandil, now a graduate student in Oregon, said she didn’t have many reservations about obtaining and administering hormones by herself, since she knew others who had gone through the process, she still undergoes regular blood tests to ensure her estrogen levels are within a safe range.
The prescription route cost her nearly $700 a year for medications and $400 in appointment copays, Qandil said — more than twice what she now pays for a two-year supply of hormones and related expenses like estrogen blood tests.
While hormone replacement therapy using a DIY approach is “cheaper and technically more accessible,” Qandil said, orders from overseas pharmacies can be unreliable, with some packages of unregulated hormones seized at the U.S. border. However, she added, DIY is cheaper even with the sunk costs, and she even has the ability to stock up on a yearly supply to ensure the hormones don’t run out during a shortage or customs confiscation.
“In an era when patients may have no option but to ‘DIY’ their transitions, just as it is happening with abortions in many states, it might be important for them to know that there are ways to do it that are overall less risky.”
DR. URI BELKIND, CALLEN-LORDE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER
Stephanie Coiro, a clinical social worker at Northwell Health’s Center for Transgender Care in New Hyde Park, New York, estimates about 10% of her transgender patients have tried acquiring hormones without a prescription at one time or another. She said this route can cut their costs by more than 50%. Though, she emphasized, those with a prescription, even if they do not have health insurance, can get testosterone or estrogen for $20 to $30 a month at stores like Target and Walmart with manufacturer coupons.
For those who do not have health insurance, anything out-of-pocket, including doctors appointments, is “incredibly expensive,” Coiro acknowledged. In addition to price concerns, she said recent shortages of hormones, like testosterone, could also drive patients to acquire medication through nonprescription means.
The cost of hormones is often one of many expenditures associated with a transition, according to experts and those receiving transition-related care. And a number of transition-related services and procedures are typically not covered by health insurance, including hair removal, which can be mandatory for some gender-affirming surgeries; therapy visits for referral notes, which are typically mandatory for prescriptions and surgeries; and gender-affirming facial and chest surgeries.
Dr. Uri Belkind, the associate director of adolescent medicine at Callen-Lorde Community Health Center, an LGBTQ-focused health clinic in New York City, called the long list of transition-related expenses a “transgender tax” that can cost trans people hundreds of thousands of dollars over their lifetime.
Across the pond, in the United Kingdom, Alicia Tuplin West, 19, has turned to unregulated online pharmacies for both cost and expedience. While England offers free gender-affirming care through a publicly funded health care system, West, a university student, said she faced a waitlist of up to several years through England’s National Health Service (joining around 26,000 others, according to The Guardian). Unwilling to wait and unable to afford a private health care alternative costing 1,000 pounds a year ($1,250), West bought hormones through an online pharmacy and cut the price by 90%, she said.
“The traditional way, it’s all socialized; it’s all paid for by my taxes,” West said. “However, I would argue that the traditional way is like a myth — the idea of getting treatment from the NHS — if you want to transition in this decade.”
Access to care
Most U.S. states still permit minors to obtain gender-affirming care with parental consent, and, for those over 18, this type of care is still legal in all 50 states. However, recent years have seen an unprecedented wave of state laws seeking to ban or restrict transition-related care, particularly for trans youths.
Eighteen states now have laws on the books banning or restricting the prescription of puberty blockers and hormones to minors, though a federal judge struck down Arkansas’ law last month, and judges have temporarily blocked laws in Alabama, Florida, Indiana, Kentucky, Oklahoma and Tennessee. At least two dozen other statesare considering such measures, and a few, like Tennessee and Oklahoma, have considered bills that would restrict this type of care for some adults.
This legislative push makes legal access to gender-affirming care nearly impossible for some people, three experts told NBC News, which could lead them to unregulated online pharmacies.
Belkind said this recent legislation “absolutely” has the potential to send more transgender people online to seek hormones. He also pointed to a recent request by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican, that asked state universities to send information to the governor’s office about students who sought or received treatment for gender dysphoria.
“People are not going to want to be on those lists for obvious reasons,” Belkind said. “They might not even disclose to their medical providers, if they seek medical care for other things, that they are on hormones.”
Dr. Danielle Brooks, an endocrinologist at Northwell Health’s Center for Transgender Care, said state legislation restricting transition-related care will likely drive more people, including minors, down the DIY path.
“I think more and more people are aware of the path,” Brooks said. “I do think that will be something that will increase over time, and it’s probably increasing now.”
Dr. Joshua Safer, director of the Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery at Mount Sinai in New York City, said patients have historically self-medicated when they don’t have access to conventional medical care. While he doesn’t think most trans youths will be able to acquire gender-affirming hormones through the informal economy, he said parents may resort to seeking medical care in other states if they have the resources.
If these youths are unable to acquire hormones, Safer said, there are “going to be negative mental health implications.”
The data supports Safer’s assertion: Transgender and gender-nonconforming individuals are at an increased risk for mental illness and suicidality, according to a study published last year in JAMA Network Open, and receipt of transition-related care is associated with 60% decreased odds of moderate or severe depression and 73% decreased odds of suicidality.
Even for adults and minors who have health insurance and live in states not affected by restrictions on transition care, insurance companies may not approve coverage for such care.
Dale Melchert, a staff attorney at the Transgender Law Center, said he has seen most insurance companies oscillate gender-affirming health care coverage based on what’s required under federal regulation, such as individual presidential administrations’ interpretation of the Affordable Care Act. While Obama-era policies blocking widespread coverage exclusions have historically prompted insurers to adjust their plans to cover more gender-affirming care, Trump-era rollbacks of these policies have since barred many from affordable access to transition care, Melchert said.
“Most insurance companies will do anything they can to save money, and denials are a way to save money,” he said. “Technically, we still have Trump’s rollbacks on the books.”
Apart from the expenses associated with transitioning, unpleasant experiences with health care providers can also dissuade individuals from seeking supervised care.
“Doctors can also ask unnecessary questions that have nothing to do with the reason they came to seek care. That feels really invasive,” Melchert said. “A lot of times doctors don’t know how to provide competent care.”
A 2018 study of students at 10 medical schools found that approximately 80% of survey respondents felt “not competent” or “somewhat not competent” treating transgender patients. According to the same study, while 93% of respondents felt somewhat or very comfortable treating sexual minority patients, 68% felt comfortable treating gender minority patients.
Dr. Ricardo Correa, an associate professor at the University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, acknowledged that there’s a “high” amount of bias in the health care community against trans people, echoing a sentiment also expressed by Brooks. However, he added, even those who want to refer patients to practices where they can receive gender-affirming care may be unable to, because the patients are based in communities where there’s an absence of physicians who are able to provide adequate help.
“Instead of food deserts, there are medical deserts,” Correa said. “The patient just gets more traumatized [and] trusts the system less.” This, he said, can lead patients to pursue a DIY approach, until they are able to find the care they seek.
A desire for control
A., a postdoctoral fellow in life scienceat a Canadian university who requested that her name not be published due to safety concerns, sourced gender-affirming hormones through overseas online pharmacies for roughly a year. She wasn’t, however, prompted by a desire to save money or a lack of health insurance. Instead, she said, her driving factor was control over her own transition.
She said she received care from a Planned Parenthood clinic in the Midwest for nearly three years, followed by care at the LGBTQ nonprofit Howard Brown Health in Chicago for several years. Eventually, she grew dissatisfied after facing remasculinization and plateauing effects, she said. Her decision to take a DIY approach was the result of a conservative approach to hormone replacement therapy by her previous health providers and a general lack of information about trans care among doctors, she said.
“At first, everything seemed to be doing fine,” she said of her transition-related care. “You see breast growth, you see that your skin is getting smoother. … All of a sudden, for no reason whatsoever, you stall or you start regressing. Your facial and body hair come back in force, and you feel general discomfort in your body and mind.”
Following years of remasculinization — including “$3,000 of laser hair removal out the window” and persistent gender dysphoria — she grew desperate for a solution, she said. That’s when she decided to turn to online pharmacies, which enabled her to increase her hormone dosage.
She said the DIY process made her “feel empowered.”
“You feel very lost, but you feel that there’s the possibility of something moving forward,” she said. “You feel like you’re taking the reins of your care.”
After a year of ordering hormones through unregulated online pharmacies and self-administering, she said, she finally found a “good, private” clinic that was willing to listen to her concerns and address her needs. While she no longer personally uses a DIY approach, she continues to serve as a resource for others starting their DIY journeys through online forums, she said.
Health and legal risks
Obtaining and administering hormones without regulated pharmacies and licensed health care providers can expose individuals to serious health risks, including blood clots, stroke, liver damage and cardiovascular disease.
“We’re always worried about excess dosing if someone’s not being monitored, because the risks are real,” Brooks said. “There’s a possibility that medical history is not being taken into account or there is something being missed.”
Brooks said several patients have come to her office with a higher-than-normal concentration of red blood cells as a result of taking “very inappropriately” high levels of testosterone. This, she added, can cause vision problems, dizziness, fatigue, weakness, confusion and, of most concern, blood clots.
“The vast majority of products offered through online pharmacies are, at best, non-U.S. FDA-approved medicines and, more often, at worst, dangerous fakes.”
LIBBY BANEY, ALLIANCE FOR SAFE ONLINE PHARMACIES
Belkind, of Callen-Lorde, said his colleagues have seen patients who ended up with injection-site infections after self-administering hormones using the wrong technique, as well as blood clots due to using the incorrect hormone dosage.
On the flip side, Belkind said, he has had patients who, prior to seeking his care, used self-prescribed hormones and found helpful resources online, where they “learned what medications are safer.”
“In an era when patients may have no option but to ‘DIY’ their transitions, just as it is happening with abortions in many states, it might be important for them to know that there are ways to do it that are overall less risky and that there are resources created by the community where they can learn how,” he said.
Libby Baney, a partner at the law firm Faegre Drinker and a senior adviser to the Alliance for Safe Online Pharmacies, a nonprofit that combats illegal online drug sellers, cautioned that those who buy medication from unregulated online pharmacies may not actually be getting what they ordered.
“U.S. consumers buying medications from online pharmacies rarely, if ever, receive exactly what they think they are ordering,” she said. “The vast majority of products offered through online pharmacies are, at best, non-U.S. FDA-approved medicines and, more often, at worst, dangerous fakes.”
The National Association of Boards of Pharmacy’s 2022 “Rogue Rx Activity Report,” which Baney’s team shared with NBC News, cites a 2008 European Alliance for Access to Safe Medicines report that found 62% of medicines purchased online are substandard or counterfeit, and a 2010 Korean study that found 26% of medications tested from online pharmacies contained toxins like mercury, lead and arsenic, while 37% of samples tested didn’t have any active ingredients at all.
“Anytime that you have a product where people have either a legitimate medical need or perceived need, people will go online to find it outside the regulated supply chain,” Baney said.
Of the approximately 30,000 to 40,000 online pharmacies around the globe, 96% don’t require a valid prescription, 85% offer medicines that aren’t authorized by the FDA and more than 50% offer controlled substances, according to the 2022 National Association of Boards of Pharmacy report.
When it comes to the legal risks, enforcement efforts generally aren’t targeted at individual consumers, but rather the unregulated pharmacies selling the medication or the intermediaries helping to facilitate importation, according to Carrie Harney, vice president of government and regulatory affairs at United States Pharmacopeia, a nonprofit that annually publishes standards for prescription and over-the-counter drugs.
As for Adomat, they have recently scrapped the DIY method in favor of medically supervised care in Pennsylvania. This decision, they said, came after a career switch that included health insurance coverage. Still, Adomat said, they wouldn’t change their five-year DIY experience if given the opportunity.
“My attitude for a while was, ‘If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it,’” Adomat said. “Adding on to a general distrust of doctors, I decided to continue to put it off and shoulder the costs and risks myself.”
Now, with the right insurance and doctor, Adomat said, they “pay a fraction” of what they did using DIY methods. But, they added, those aren’t the only reasons why they’re currently content with the state of their care and their health: “I’m grateful I have a supportive family and legislature around me.”
If you or someone you know is in crisis, call 988 to reach the Suicide and Crisis Lifeline. You can also call 800-273-8255, text HOME to 741741 or visit SpeakingOfSuicide.com/resources for additional resources.
A Kansas law will reverse gender markers on trans people’s birth certificates and driving licences, in a move deemed “disastrous” for those affected.
On Monday (26 June), state attorney general Kris Kobach confirmed to reporters that the new law – Senate Bill 180 – which takes effect from 1 July, will legally erase trans people’s gender identities.
Kobach said the law will also force public schools to record students as the gender assigned at birth, regardless of whether teachers and staff recognise gender identities of trans and non-binary students.
The legislation, described by the Kansas Senate as a “women’s bill of rights,” defines “sex” as “either male or female at birth” in state law, with no alternative definition for individuals who identify as trans, non-binary, gender fluid, or gender-non-conforming.
In addition, trans people will be forced to use toilets and other single-sex spaces corresponding to the gender they were assigned at birth.
Republican representative Brenda Landwehr, who voted for the bill, said it would “protect women’s spaces currently reserved for women and men’s spaces currently reserved for men”.
‘That does not make you a woman’
Senator Renee Erickson, one of three Republican lawmakers who joined Kobach during his news conference, said: “You can choose whatever name you want. You can choose to live however you want. That does not make you a woman.”
The law follows a 2019 ruling which saw a federal judge order Kansas to allow trans people to change their birth certificates to settle a lawsuit over a no-change policy. SB 180 would see the 2019 order cancelled.
Micah Kubic, the executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Kansas, accused Kobach of rushing to “impose his own stamp of extremism”. He added that state agencies are not required to adopt the attorney general’s views.
‘Disastrous and fraught with difficulty’
Trans activist and journalist Erin Reed, whose partner is trans Montana lawmaker Zooey Zephyr, said of the new law: “Rolling back transgender people’s legal markers would be disastrous and fraught with difficulty.”
Reed said enforcing incorrect gender markers could lead trans people to experience heightened “harassment and abuse”.
In May, Montana’s Senate Bill 458 was signed into law. The Republican-backed legislation defines “sex” as binary – excluding intersex, non-binary and trans people.
Zephyr has been vocal in opposing Republican’s anti-LGBTQ+ bills, which saw her banned from the floor of the state’s House of Representatives.
‘Calculated manoeuvre’
Reed added: “The calculated manoeuvre of redefining sex to systematically exclude transgender individuals is an attempt to sidestep legal challenges. These laws represent a clear attempt to move beyond targeting transgender youth and the beginning of the campaign to eradicate transgender adults from all legal protections.”
According to AP News, Omar Gonzalez-Pagan, a lawyer for Lambda Legal, said: “The attorney general must be off his rocker. This was a bunch of bombast by an attorney general engaging in politics.”
LGBTQ+ Victory Fund, the only national organization dedicated to electing LGBTQ+ leaders to public office, endorsed 19 more out LGBTQ+ candidates. Victory Fund has now endorsed 145 candidates running in the 2023 cycle and 11 candidates running in the 2024 cycle.
As the U.S. Supreme Court continues to save its most controversial rulings that reshape American society for the end of its session like a cliffhanger at the end of a television season, it once again issued a ruling that upends decades of precedent. With the ultraconservative court’s ruling that ends affirmative action in college admissions in the U.S., experts and advocates warn that the unintended consequences of the ruling will be detrimental to many, including Black and brown queer college students.
One of the most concerning outcomes of the ruling is the effect that it will have on historically Black colleges and universities, they say.
Human Rights Campaign HBCU program director Leslie Hall says that it’s imperative to highlight that the effects of this ruling will result in fewer queer Black students accessing higher education while also adding strain to historically Black colleges and universities as students seek refuge in environments where their abilities are valued.
“The University of California did this a couple of years ago, even without this case,” Hall tells The Advocate. “They said they’d no longer use race as a checkbox on the admission criteria. And what happened is what everybody knew was going to happen. The BIPOC numbers in the UC system have gone down precipitously.”
He says that to understand how the court got to this point, one needs to know why HBCUs exist.
“It’s because Black folks in particular were unable, were not allowed by practice or by law to go to the predominant national public institutions, and even when the Civil Rights Act was passed, they were still putting very Jim Crow-esque things in place to continue to keep [Black students] out. And so that prevented qualified Black folks, African Americans, from being accepted into some of the elite institutions.”
He notes that innate human biases are entrenched in admissions policies and with the admissions counselors themselves.
“So this affirmative action decision is now basically asking, What would happen if y’all do it on your own because it’s just morally the right thing to do?”
He points to the hypocrisy of the Supreme Court’s conservative justices, who recently ruled that Alabama Republicans needed to redraw their congressional districts because of racism that disadvantaged Black communities in the state.
“The court is saying it needs to step in there because racism exists, but in the affirmative action ruling, the court is saying racism doesn’t exist or, better yet, that if left to their own devices, people would do the right thing,” he says.
He adds that the promise of America is that “all men are created equal,” which, as defined at the time the Constitution was written, excluded women, brown and Black people.
“Wo here we are in a situation the enrollment of HBCUs has been steadily climbing because of all the racial things that are happening, but when we look at some of the national public institutions, it really boils down to access,” Hall says.
“Will a valedictorian of an all-Black high school even feel empowered to apply for admission to some of these places?” he asks. “When has this country ever been color-blind?”
He says it has never been.
“So when you try to appeal to the best conscience of America, that is a noble ideal, but no, when have we demonstrated that?”
Hall notes that there might be a silver lining in that HBCUs may get additional talented students who otherwise would have applied at a non-HBCU but who chose to forgo that option.
“HBCUs don’t exist for the lowest quartile of Black folks who apply. Howard is considered a selective institution, but you’ve talked to students; they’re almost like 80 percent Pell Grant eligible, given the economic backgrounds that some of these students have,” he says. Pell Grants come from a federal program that helps students who have extreme financial need.
He adds, “So first, schools will have to lean more into their scholarship offerings to get some of these students in. But two, I think students will be able to see the real benefit of going to a historically Black college or university.”
Libraries in Greenville County, S.C., have been ordered to remove all displays after a manager refused to take down a Pride one.
Nathan Schmaltz , the manager of the Travelers Rest branch, rejected the library administration’s order to remove a “Read with Pride” display, prompting the board to vote to remove all displays from libraries in the district. The decision came just three months after the board instated a new policy that requires displays to be approved by the library system’s executive director.
Last year, the library system removed LGBTQ+ displays from several libraries in the district, until they were quickly returned after public backlash. Schmaltz told local news outlet The Post and Courierthat since then, no other displays have triggered action from the board.
He said that he refused to remove the display because he did not want to cause the LGBTQ+ community any more “pain or distress,” and that their branch had received comments from community members overwhelmingly in support of the display, and only one threatening phone call.
“I’m very thankful for the support the community has given us. It’s been overwhelmingly positive,” Schmaltz said. “[The board] wrote the policy. They could have written it better.”
The order from the board is temporary, and all Pride materials currently displayed can remain up until the end of June. The board also designated $25,000 for extra security at the Travelers Rest branch if needed over possible threats to the library.
At the conference following the vote, many citizens were unable to speak out against the board’s decision after Chair Allan Hill abruptly ended the meeting. Hill had allowed a Baptist pastor to ramble about “sexual proclivities” past the allotted three minutes, but forbade Stephen Shelato, a former librarian and frequent attendee, from speaking, as he had exceeded his time limit in a past meeting. Hill ordered officers to remove Shelato, then suddenly adjourned.
One patron who was unable to speak, Danielle Harbor, who frequents the Travelers Rest branch, shared her prepared remarks with The Post after the chaotic meeting.
“It is a symbol to indicate to the LGBTQ population that has so often not felt like part of the community, that they are welcome, accepted, and safe,” she said. “Is that really something you want to take away?”
