Opening this month: Directory of Dreams: Bay Area Lesbian Economies and Radical Care, 1970–1995. This new exhibition, curated and co-presented by the Bay Area Lesbian Archives (BALA), traces the everyday efforts of Bay Area lesbians who refused erasure and built community networks rooted in care, solidarity, and economic self-determination.
From women-run cafés and bookstores to credit unions and service businesses, these were more than small enterprises — they became networks of mutual aid sustaining entire communities.
Grassroots tools made these worlds visible to one another: self-published directories, maps, flyers, menus, and ephemera connecting people to jobs, housing, political spaces, and affirming services, in a society that often denied them all.
Directory of Dreams invites visitors to reflect on how these networks of radical care shaped lesbian life in the Bay Area — and what it means to build and sustain shared systems of care today.
March is officially here, and Sonoma County Library is buzzing with energy. This month, we’re leaning into the spirit of discovery, whether that’s exploring the microscopic world at the North Bay Science Discovery Day, uncovering the hidden ecological “gifts” of poison oak, or honoring the legacy of trailblazing women for Women’s History Month.Whatever your curiosity looks like this month, we have a seat waiting for you. Dive into the highlights below or check out our full events calendar to plan your next visit! Sincerely,
The Sonoma County LibraryChildrenCoventry & Kaluza ShowCoventry & Kaluza bring a variety of skills and thrills to their show, which features juggling, acrobatics, music, comedy, and lots of hula hooping. It’s interactive fun for the whole family! Windsor, Healdsburg, Northwest Santa Rosa, Sonoma ValleySeeds and Reads: The True Story of Poison OakIs poison oak a backyard villain or an ecological hero? Join naturalist Emma Rohleder (Vilda Nature) to uncover the surprising “gifts” of this misunderstood plant and create nature-based art. Registration is encouraged but not required. Grades K-6.Guerneville, Healdsburg, Northwest Santa Rosa, Rohnert Park Cotati, Sebastopol, WindsorTeensBilingual Paint PartyDevelop your painting techniques while practicing Spanish and English vocabulary in a guided, step-by-step session led by Napa Valley Painting. Advanced registration is required. Grades 7-12.Roseland,Northwest, HealdsburgFeminist Icons in Zine HistoryUncover the DIY world of feminist zines and the creators who used them to challenge the status quo. Explore the history of feminist self-publishing, then join a brainstorming workshop to help you start your own zine. Grades 7-12.SebastopolAdultsEnglish Conversation ClubImprove your English in a relaxed, supportive environment. These drop-in sessions are designed for adult learners of all levels to practice speaking and build confidence. No registration is required.Central Santa Rosa, Petaluma, Rohnert Park Cotati, Roseland, WindsorAfro Roots World MusicExperience the vibrant sounds of West African music with instrumentalist Keenan Webster. This performance brings traditional rhythms to life, using the power of music to bridge cultures and unite our community.Cloverdale, Sonoma Valley, WindsorIn the SpotlightCelebrate Women’s History MonthJoin us in celebrating the economic, cultural, and political achievements of women this month and throughout the year through events, displays, and resources.See detailsRincon Valley Library temporary closure Change is good! Rincon Valley Regional Library will be closed from March 16 to late June for significant updates. The Bibliobus will be available on Mon (10 am-1 pm) and Wed & Sun (1-4 pm).See details Eventos de marzoMarzo ya está aquí oficialmente y nuestras bibliotecas están llenas de energía. Este mes nos dedicamos al espíritu del descubrimiento, ya sea explorando el mundo microscópico en el North Bay Science Discovery Day, descubriendo los «regalos» ecológicos ocultos del roble venenoso o rindiendo homenaje al legado de las mujeres pioneras con motivo del Mes de la Historia de la Mujer.
Sea cual sea tu curiosidad este mes, tenemos un asiento esperándote. ¡Sumérgete en los aspectos más destacados a continuación y planifica tu próxima visita!NiñesEspectáculo de Coventry y KaluzaCoventry & Kaluza traen una variedad de habilidades y emociones a su espectáculo, que incluye malabares, acrobacias, música, comedia y mucho hula hoop. ¡Es diversión interactiva para toda la familia!Windsor, Healdsburg, Northwest Santa Rosa, Sonoma ValleySemillas y Libros: La verdadera historia del roble venenoso¿Es el roble venenoso un villano del jardín o un héroe ecológico? Únete a la naturalista Emma Rohleder (Vilda Nature) para descubrir los sorprendentes «regalos» de esta planta incomprendida. Para alumnos de K-6. Inscríbete para reservar tu plaza y recibir un correo electrónico de recordatorio.Guerneville, Healdsburg, Northwest Santa Rosa, Rohnert Park Cotati, Sebastopol, WindsorJóvenesFiesta de pintura bilingüeDesarrolla tus técnicas de pintura mientras practicas vocabulario en español e inglés en una sesión guiada paso a paso dirigida por Napa Valley Painting. Ya sea que seas artista con experiencia o simplemente quieras probar algo nuevo, te llevarás una obra maestra terminada y algunas frases nuevas para usar. Grados 7-12.Roseland,Northwest, HealdsburgÍconos feministas en la historia de los zines Descubre el mundo DIY de los zines feministas y a las creadoras que los utilizaron para desafiar el orden establecido. Esta sesión explora la historia de la autoedición feminista, seguida de un taller de lluvia de ideas para ayudarte a crear tu propio zine. Grados 7-12. Sebastopol
In October 2025, Canadian politicians from British Columbia (B.C.) gathered in the provincial capital to vote on a motion to symbolically condemn the “intolerant” and “harmful” views of the Association for Reformed Political Action (ARPA), a far-right group that describes itself as a “Christian political advocacy organization.”
“They are an organization that wants to end the federal ban on the documented, harmful and sinister practice of conversion therapy,” Rohini Arora, a member of Canada’s left-wing New Democratic Party, argued to her colleagues. “They’re the harassers in that story. The things that they stand for are about not letting people be who they are, not letting them love who they love.”
Every Conservative politician in the room refused to vote on the motion and instead walked out. This was likely due to former Conservative Party leader John Rustad asking his party members to “not participate in divisive politics.”
Despite the motion passing 48-3, ARPA is very active in Canadian politics. They’ve filed 322 communication lobbying reports with the Canadian government since 2012. Some of these include efforts to eliminate education around sexual orientation and gender identity in B.C.’s schools, as well as end access to gender-affirming care for minors. One of ARPA’s current fights is to overturn Canada’s ban on conversion therapy.
“Someone who struggles with unwanted same-sex attraction or sexual behavior … should be free to seek help to live their beliefs and identity, but this law forbids it,” ARPA states in an article titled “Changing Canada’s Conversion Therapy Ban.”
History and Leadership
Founded in 2007 as a national nonprofit, ARPA is associated with Reformed Christianity—a denomination that stems from the Protestant Reformation. The Christian Reformed Church states that “homosexual practice … is incompatible with obedience to the will of God.” Homosexuality is described as “a condition” for which Reformed Christians “must exercise the same compassion for same-sex oriented persons in their sins as [they] exercise for all other sinners.”
In an article published by a Reformed Christianity journal, pastors with trans congregants are advised that “the first line of response should be to call for confession and repentance.” The article encourages trans people to detransition by “correct[ing] or revers[ing] any steps that have been taken in the wrong direction (whether hormone treatment or reconstructive surgery).”
Since their founding, ARPA has grown significantly. According to their website, they have at least 12 employees, as well as main offices in southern B.C. and Ottawa, and chapters in Ontario, Alberta and B.C.
Many of ARPA’s lobbyists aim to push the Canadian government to pass anti-LGBTQ policies. Levi Minderhoud, ARPA’s B.C. manager—who has advocated for “the elimination of [sexual orientation and gender identity] in [B.C.] schools”—wrote an article in which he calls out “gender identity warriors.” In the piece, he quotes The Heritage Foundation, a right-wing think tank that penned Project 2025.
“It’s time that the Ontario Progressive Conservatives live up to their name, listen to Ontarians, and remove gender ideology from the classroom,” Minderhoud writes.
Through the years, ARPA’s anti-LGBTQ push has been prevalent in their communications. In a 2020 letter to pastors of Christian congregations in Canada, ARPA’s former director of law and policy, André M. Schutten, urges recipients to push back against the country’s new conversion therapy ban.
“Brothers, as Christians, we recognize that same-sex sexual desires and conduct, like any sexual desires or conduct that do not conform to God’s norms, are wrong and we must repent of them. … If this bill passes unamended, aspects of your ministry (to youth in particular) in an age of sexual confusion would be criminalized,” Schutten writes, adding action items that include praying, praying again and writing a letter to their Member of Parliament (MP).
Current Lobbying Efforts
Fast forward to now and ARPA is continuing a push to overturn Bill-C4, Canada’s conversion therapy ban, which illegalizes the ineffective practice linked to poor self-esteem, substance abuse, anxiety, depression and suicidality.
Screenshot/ARPA Canada
In defending their critique of the bill, ARPA quotes the late American psychologist Joseph Nicolosi.
Nicolosi authored “A Parent’s Guide to Preventing Homosexuality” and was a founder of the National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality, an organization that promotes conversion therapy.
ARPA is also working against the Combatting Hate Act, or Bill C-9. If passed, this bill would lower the threshold for what counts as hate speech and would removethe good-faith defense, which protects an individual from being found guilty of hate speech if their views are based on religious texts.
In a Facebook video, ARPA lawyer John Sikkema speaks out against Bill C-9 and asks for Canadians’ help in “preserving religious freedom in Canada.”
“Join us in calling on Members of Parliament to preserve religious freedom in Canada, and specifically, the freedom to share publicly what the Bible teaches about marriage and sexuality,” says Sikkema, adding that folks should write to and call their MPs.
Much like far-right groups in the U.S., ARPA’s anti-LGBTQ views are driven by their interpretation of Christianity. “These groups interpret these bills and laws as Christian persecution. It is an attack on both their Christian values and their religion, in their minds,” says Carmen Celestini, a postdoctoral fellow with Queen’s University School of Religion. “If they cannot preach and evangelize to save [LGBTQ people] then it is understood as a direct attack on their religious practice and worldview.”
Offshoot Organizations
On top of their lobbying efforts, ARPA runs anti-LGBTQ offshoot organizations. Let Kids Be, for example, is dedicated to ending gender-affirming care for youth. “Stop medical transition for minors” is the lead line on their homepage, followed by false or misleading statements about trans health care, including one that implies that trans kids are experiencing body dysmorphia because of school bullies: “A middle schooler doesn’t understand that a bully mocking her body will not stop if her body changes,” the website reads.
In the summer of 2025, Let Kids Be put up a billboard near a highway in Hamilton, Ontario, that stated, “Stop medical transition for minors.” In response, the city’s mayor, Andrea Horwath, ordered the billboard to be taken down, leading ARPA to challenge the decision. The legal battle is ongoing.
The organization is also defending the Christian Heritage Party in a lawsuit against Hamilton after they tried to run anti-trans ads on the city’s bus shelters.
Against Gay Marriage
In addition to opposing gender-affirming health care and trans rights, ARPA is also against gay marriage. On their website, they link to a 2004 article with the headline “FOUR STUPID ARGUMENTS AGAINST GAY MARRIAGE… AND ONE GOOD ONE!”
In the article, the author writes, “Since God created the institution of Marriage, He gets to decide what it is, and what it isn’t,” and goes on to describe gay marriage as a “poor, sickly imitation the world is proposing.”
And in a 2025 ARPA article titled “TWENTY YEARS OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN CANADA,” they describe gay marriage as a “fall into sin,” and the increase in Canadians’ support for marriage equality as “stark.”
Kayla Preston, Ph.D candidate in the Department of Sociology at the University of Toronto, says that using a pro-family model is a strategy used by far-right groups to mask homophobia. “Instead of saying, ‘We’re anti-LGBTQIA+,’ they’ll say, ‘We’re pro-traditional families. We’re pro-maintaining gender roles,’” she told Uncloseted Media and GAY TIMES.
Celestini says homophobia and opposition to gay marriage is common among many far-right organizations in Canada. “ARPA is one amongst many (Action4Canada, Liberty Coalition Canada, Save Canada, etc.) and they interact, sending out a cohesive message to their followers. Those followers are the electorate, and are also very active politically,” she says. “Religious values can be an umbrella term that erases dogma and denomination from the equation and simply creates a movement.”
Training the Next Generation of Anti-LGBTQ Conservatives
As ARPA continues their lobbying efforts, they’re also training the next generation by running programs in an attempt to provide young Canadians with the “confidence to apply [their] faith wherever God calls [them].” One of their offerings is ARPA Academy, a four-week program based out of Ottawa, Canada’s capital and political epicenter. According to ARPA, participants will “dig into the biblical foundation for political action,” and are encouraged to see the academy as “a stepping stone towards further work in politics or the non-profit sector.”
And in September, ARPA is hosting their Foundations Conference. The conference is designed “to equip thoughtful Christians with a deeper understanding of how faith shapes public life” and will host multiple anti-LGBTQ speakers, including Nancy Pearcey, an evangelical author who claims that “males and females are counterparts to one another. … To embrace a same-sex identity, then, is to contradict that design.”
Proximity to Canada’s Conservative Party
Above all, ARPA’s key goal is to influence Canadian politics. And they’ve already formed relationships with Canadian politicians, where they communicate on issues ranging from justice and law enforcement to health. Conservative Member of Provincial Parliament Sam Oosterhoff spoke at an ARPA event in 2020, and again in 2024. And ARPA Niagara chapter director Dave Broere has donated to Oosterhoff’s campaign.
In May 2025, B.C. Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) John Rustad—who, at the time, was the leader of the B.C. Conservatives—attended an ARPA event at the B.C. legislature, along with a dozen other members of his party.
The decision to attend this event drew criticism from Elenore Sturko, a lesbian MLA.
“I was angry, and I felt hurt. … I think a lot about the young people who are growing up right now and are part of the LGBT community. I think that some of the toxicity has never been worse than it is now … and I just felt like, ‘You know what? I have a duty as someone who’s visible to actually stand up for our community,’” Sturko told Uncloseted Media and GAY TIMES.
How Anti-LGBTQ Hate Thrives in Canada
While ARPA’s goals defy what most citizens want—as 75% of Canadians supportgay unions—the organization is still allowed to operate as a nonprofit because it is working towards the “advancement of religion.” This means that even though ARPA promotes homophobic and transphobic ideas, they are able to continue their work because they are a protected Christian organization. And while a 2024 report floated the idea of removing religion as a charitable cause, it does not appear the protection is likely to disappear any time soon.
When it comes to the kinds of issues that far-right groups in the U.S. and Canada are concerned with, Celestini says that there isn’t much difference. To her, the most prominent distinction has to do with the way Americans and Canadians think and talk about the far right.
“Most people don’t know that the Proud Boys were started by a Canadian, or that we have a lot of really right-wing extremist groups here in the nation. I think that we’re subtler about it and quieter about it,” she says.
She says being more discreet can come at a cost, however, in that it allows Canadian far-right groups to quietly grow more extreme. “That is problematic because a lot of Christian nationalist groups are actually engaging with American Christian nationalists and extremists and not seeing it as Christian America or Christian Canada, but Christian North America,” she says.
ARPA is getting noticed south of the border. The Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), one of America’s most powerful Christian legal organizations that has been designated an anti-LGBTQ hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center, is also concerned with Canada’s Combatting Hate Act. According to an article the ADF released in January, the act demonstrates what happens “once fear leads people to empower the state to impose its view on fundamental matters by labeling dissenting speech as ‘hate.’”
As ARPA gains momentum, Preston says Canadians can equip themselves to identify and respond to far-right rhetoric.
“Be critical of anyone who gives you a very simple answer to a very complex question. So if anyone’s saying, ‘The economy’s bad because of these individual groups or this set of people,’ that’s probably something to be more critical of,” she says.
Celestini suggests combatting extremism by taking an approach rooted in emotional connection and understanding: “When we’re talking to people who are involved in sort of extremist ideas or are on the edge of going into these groups, paying attention to what it is that they’re afraid of is very helpful,” she says. “You need to talk to them on an emotional level and try to find out what that fear is behind the beliefs.”
Two of Senegal’s highest-profile celebrities were among 12 people rounded up and charged with committing “unnatural,” or homosexual, acts, among other crimes, police in the capital of Dakar announced Sunday.
Pape Cheikh Diallo, a widely admired TV and radio presenter, and Djiby Dramé, a popular musician, were two of the men charged in the case linked to an individual who has admitted to knowingly spreading HIV, according to The New York Times.
An HIV-positive individual “confessed to knowingly infecting about ten people he had contacted, primarily through WhatsApp groups,” authorities said.
Police didn’t elaborate on who the individual is or his connection with the other men, but all 12 men were remanded to prison while a judge investigates the case.
A preliminary indictment from prosecutors added a charge of money laundering to the evidence used to initially round the men up, Senegal news site Senewebreports. All of the men broke down in tears as the judge announced their pretrial detention.
“A lot of what’s being said in the media about Pape Cheikh is not true,” said a lawyer for TV presenter Diallo, Abdou Dieng, after the hearing. Other lawyers in court declined to comment.
Diallo, 42, is best known for interviewing celebrities on TV and radio, and enjoys a large fan base of young people on TikTok, with about three million followers.
Dramé, also in his 40s, appeals to older Senegalese and is well known for duets with his wife that feature prominently at weddings in the country. They host an annual high-society gala that celebrates Bazin, the luxurious damask cotton fabric with roots in West Africa.
Stop Homophobie, a Paris-based LGBTQ+ rights group with ties to Senegal, condemned the arrests. The state action will further expose the community to stigma in the devoutly Muslim country, the group’s director told Seneweb.
Senegal earns a score of 4 out of 100 on the Equaldex Equality Index.
The Senegal Penal Code states, “whoever will have committed an improper or unnatural act with a person of the same sex will be punished by imprisonment of between one and five years.”
As well as Diallo and Dramé, one of West Africa’s most iconic artists has been swept up in the controversy surrounding the arrests. TFM, the country’s most-watched television channel and Diallo’s employer, was founded by Senegalese singer Youssou N’Dour, described by Rolling Stone as “perhaps the most famous singer alive” in Senegal and much of Africa.
Islamist critics of “degenerate” Western values are implicating N’Dour in the scandal over his connection with Diallo as his “boss” at TFM.
“Whoever plays games with Islam will suffer the wrath of God,” said one reply to Seneweb’s story of the arrests.
It was a quiet Thursday ahead of Thanksgiving break at the University at Buffalo (UB) when Maria B. Quagliana received an email from the school that said campus police had confiscated several firearms from a student in response to reports of a “concerning conversation.”
That student was Jacob Cassidy, the president of UB’s chapter of Young Americans for Freedom (YAF), a right-wing student group. Cassidy had been overheard threatening to shoot up the school, allegedly telling his friend that he had “a foldable AR in [his] bag,” adding: “I’ll shoot them in the foot and knee so they can’t get away.”
Quagliana, a first-year student at UB’s law school, had run into Cassidy a week earlier at a counter-protest of a YAF event in support of ICE deportations. While Cassidy has received an interim suspension, Quagliana has still felt “extremely anxious” since getting the alert.
“This person knows what I look like,” Quagliana told Uncloseted Media and GAY TIMES. “I’ve had multiple panic attacks either in my car or waiting to walk into the building.”
Quagliana says that this was just the latest in a string of incidents surrounding YAF on campus. The group, which was prominent in the 1960s but faded into the background over time, has experienced a resurgence in activity nationwide and now reportedly has over 400 chapters at colleges and high schools in the U.S. That resurgence comes in the wake of the assassination of conservative campus activist and co-founder of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) Charlie Kirk.
Like other right-wing campus groups, YAF has a reputation for provocative actions and rhetoric as well as for promoting anti-LGBTQ sentiments. Chapters have plastered campuses with chalk art denigrating gay marriage and hosted anti-trans speakers, including one who’s said that “transgenderism must be eradicated from public life.”
“Anti-LGBTQ groups on campus pose a unique threat to queer people because they’re in immediate proximity,” says Lauren Lassabe Shepherd, the author of “Resistance from the Right: Conservatives and the Campus Wars in Modern America.”
“They have access to their LGBTQ peers that off-campus agitators often cannot get. Anti-gay clubs are well-positioned to surveil, report on, and harass queer students, faculty, and other college employees where they spend the majority of their day either studying, working, and, in many cases, residing.”
What Is YAF?
YAF was founded in 1960 by conservative activist William F. Buckley Jr. It was one of the first campus-focused groups from a new wave of American conservatism pioneered by presidential candidate Barry Goldwater. The group garnered the support of future president Ronald Reagan and made its mark as an incubator for conservative politicians and activists. Noteworthy alumni include former U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions and former Vice President Dan Quayle, as well as the founders of right-wing groups including the Leadership Institute and Citizens United.
Shepherd says YAF began falling apart in the 1970s and showed little sign of life until 2011, when it was officially made a subsidiary of the similarly named Young America’s Foundation, another right-wing group that hosts youth-focused conferences and programs and was a member of Project 2025’s advisory board. Since then, it has increased in prominence, alongside its much more popular counterpart TPUSA, propelled by funding from right-wing megadonors including the Koch Brothers and Richard and Helen DeVos.
Shepherd says that YAF’s revival took place as conservative activists began to emulate Donald Trump during his rise in 2015: more provocative, more confrontational and, in some cases, more extremist. In 2017, The New York Times reported on the group hosting controversial speakers like Ann Coulter and Ben Shapiro. At the same time, YAF leaders would offer training to young activists, teaching them regulations on chalking, flyering and recording conversations. They’d also give them tips on how to pressure schools to cover security costs for speakers.
“The provocative ‘debate me bro’ or ‘prove me wrong’ is how groups with lesser profiles get noticed,” says Matthew Boedy, an English professor at the University of North Georgia and author of “The Seven Mountains Mandate,” a book published in September about Charlie Kirk and TPUSA. “But also, social media virality demands a provocation. And that is the goal.”
Shepherd also notes that the group’s higher-ups are not youth and have little connection to college campuses. Young America’s Foundation’s current president is 58-year-old former Wisconsin governor and Republican presidential candidate Scott Walker.
“That has a lot to do with older people who want to spread the word about conservatism … and of course they’re going to recruit on college campuses, because those are young people who are getting ready to begin their careers,” says Shepherd. “So yes, I have seen the resurgence, but no, I don’t think it’s organic.”
Sowing Chaos
Part of that resurgence is due to the spike in campus conservative activity after Kirk’s assassination. In the two weeks after his death, TPUSA reported over 121,000 new chapter requests.
“After I heard about the assassination of Charlie Kirk, I also was emboldened,” 20-year-old Kyle McBride told Uncloseted Media and GAY TIMES. “I’ve never been a joiner, but after that, it made me want to get involved.”
McBride, an engineering student at Rose State College in Oklahoma, says his school was home to one of those new TPUSA chapters. And since it launched at the start of the semester, he says it’s grown to become the second largest student group on campus, with 60 members.
Carrying that momentum, McBride is working to start a YAF chapter at his school. He says his main motivation for doing so is to boost his resume and to connect with like-minded people.
McBride says he believes gender transition is “morally wrong” and that “transgenderism, as a concept, should not be allocated across the United States,” but that trans people “must still be treated with full dignity” and “compassion.” Scholars and advocates have argued that there is no meaningful distinction between “transgenderism” and the existence of trans people.
While McBride and other right-wingers see this new wave of activity as an opportunity, Ted Pranikoff, a sophomore environmental design major at UB, feels endangered. He says that he got into an altercation with right-wing protestors on campus that ended in them grabbing and yanking at his wheelchair. Pranikoff also remembers YAF members and affiliates calling him and his friends “fags” and shouting, “Cripple repent and be healed.”
While McBride doesn’t agree with using slurs and insults because it “robs the person of their dignity,” he is also a proponent of free speech and doesn’t support “censorship,” even if it involves hateful rhetoric.
“You sort of just have to not condone it, but you kind of just have to let it go,” McBride says. “The only thing that’s really left to do is just say, ‘Hey, don’t do that.’”
Anti-LGBTQ Sentiment
Still, many YAF chapters use inflammatory rhetoric to get a response from progressive students on campus, which they later post online to attract support from right-wing media.
The YAF chapter at Oklahoma State University has gotten backlash for discriminatory rhetoric, including chalk art opposing gay marriage with statements like, “Humanity dies without traditional marriage, 1 man + 1 woman.”
Photos of the chalk art (shared by an anonymous OSU student)
According to Jack Green, who graduated from UB in winter 2024, this behavior is not new.
“YAF made traps: They noticed some people were taking down their posters, so what they would do is that they would put up like 20 on one board, and then if somebody came and took it down, they would film them,” Green told Uncloseted Media and GAY TIMES. “I don’t really know what their goal was besides wanting to doxx people, to harass people.”
As YAF’s resurgence continues, so does its anti-LGBTQ footprint. University of Iowa’s YAF chapter has faced calls for suspension following leaked messages from a group chat that showed members using transphobic slurs in a conversation about other students on campus.
At the University of Alabama, all student groups are required to include a non-discrimination clause in their constitution. However, after complaining to the university on an email chain that also included the state’s attorney general, the YAF chapter was given an exception that allowed them to remove the terms “gender identity,” “gender expression” and “sexual identity” from their statement.
And at the University of Utah, YAF put up several posters claiming that “men shouldn’t be in women’s bathrooms” and “the transgender movement harms children.”
Extremism
Shepherd describes the typical YAF student as someone who “[is] in a fraternity, potentially an athlete, maybe on the debate team, [or] wears a suit to school.”
But in terms of political ideology, its members vary widely. McBride says his politics are more aligned with his interpretation of Catholicism than with modern conservatism. As a result, he differs from the majority of the group on some issues.
“I’m big into civil liberties, maintaining and preserving dignity for all people,” he says. “I’m not strictly against Trump, but a lot of the things he does and says I’m not really on board with. But it’s the closest group that I could find that champions at least some of my ideology.”
The group also includes a sizable population of more violent radicals. In 2007, the YAF chapter at Michigan State University briefly held the dubious distinction of being the only college student group to be designated as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center, following an anti-LGBTQ protest that included slogans such as “straight power” and “end faggotry.” In 2022, that chapter’s former leader reappeared on campus, causing one student’s thesis presentation on YAF’s connection to white nationalism to be moved online due to security concerns.
Cassidy, the allegedly thwarted shooter, seems to have had more radical beliefs for quite some time. Cain Pietraszewski, a UB student who went to high school with Cassidy, says he was a “very stereotypical redneck Republican.”
“He was very open about his opinions,” they say. “A lot of anti-immigration, anti-non-white, non-straight, non-cis stuff. … It didn’t surprise me that someone of [Cassidy’s] mindset would make these threats.”
Shepherd says this form of extremism isn’t representative of YAF as a whole, “but they’re not an anomaly either. … It’s a strong contingency.”
Boedy says that contingency has grown because white nationalist influencerNick Fuentes has pushed campus conservatism further to the right.
“There’s a different type of aggression or provocateurism that has come along in recent years, especially since Nick Fuentes came on the scene—he criticized and ambushed and did all different types of things to Turning Point to get it to be more racist,” Boedy says. “His followers will infiltrate these groups [and] become leaders. … He has influence on a lot of people who claim membership in Turning Point and YAF.”
At the same time, there are signs that anti-LGBTQ hate has been on the rise. In 2024, The Washington Post reported that annual hate crimes against LGBTQ people on both K-12 and college campuses had more than double the average for the latter half of the 2010s.
“It feels like [YAF] were almost restrained beforehand, and now they have permission to be mask-off, in-your-face racist,” says Pranikoff.
McBride says he’s not surprised to hear about this increase in extremism, but also says it wouldn’t dissuade him from starting his chapter.
“I was not intimately aware of YAF and its proclivity to produce or attract people like that, but I’m also not really surprised in general because this new alt-right pipeline is very potent,” he says. “If people come in and they’re interested in Catholicism, then I could probably easily dissuade them from a white supremacist or white nationalist kind of stance. But for people who are just with that view just because … I don’t know what I’d do with those people.”
Legal Threats
Despite YAF’s connection to radicalism, Green says the group is “coddled” by UB’s administration and often gets off with lighter treatment than other campus groups. He compares their reaction to YAF protests, which he says have rarely drawn the attention of campus police, with 2024’s pro-Palestinian encampment protests, where officers tackled and arrested protestors. More recently, campus police removed LGBTQ student activists from a sit-in protest at the end of the fall 2025 semester.
“Compared to us, it’s like night and day,” Green says. “YAF filming students without their consent, that didn’t cause them to have any [administrative] backlash at all. There also seems to be this weird support from the [campus police department] for YAF—whenever there’s a demonstration, you can always see a YAFer and a cop talking to each other and being friendly, while their relationship to basically everyone else is much more hostile.”
One reason may be that YAF chapters nationwide often respond to university backlash with legal threats. Last March, YAF’s Gettysburg College chapter filed a complaint with the Department of Education, accusing numerous diversity-related campus programs and LGBTQ student groups of “ongoing civil rights violations against conservative students.” And a legal threat convinced the University of Wisconsin-Madison to waive more than $4,000 in security and event fees for one of YAF’s events.
“Part of that can be explained by the fact that many YAF alumni are lawyers,” Shepherd says. “It’s a low-cost tactic because it’s in their professional wheelhouse. Lawsuits—or even just the threat of a suit—tend to scare colleges. They’d rather avoid a suit or settle than risk a headline.”
Protest against Daily Wire Correspondent Michael Knowles’ speech at University at Buffalo. (WGRZ)
One of the first major actions Green remembers from YAF was inviting a correspondent for the right-wing media outlet The Daily Wireto speak on campus just days after an infamous speech where he said that “transgenderism must be eradicated from public life entirely.” In response, the school changed some of its policies regarding affiliations between campus and national organizations, leading YAF to lose its official organization status. The group then lawyered up with Southern Poverty Law Center-designated anti-LGBTQ hate group Alliance Defending Freedom and sued for first amendment violations and discrimination.
While the lawsuit, in which Cassidy was named as a plaintiff, was eventually dismissed, the policy YAF took issue with was repealed before it ever even went into effect.
“UB backed down immediately,” Green says. “They seem to be afraid of their lawyers, but also trying to have this weird middle ground, trying to be this very open queer-friendly university but also wanting to have this very conservative, homophobic … group on campus.”
What Can Universities Do?
Shepherd and Boedy both say that while Kirk’s killing has emboldened campus conservatives in the short term, it’s unclear if and how that will continue.
“Whatever momentum or inertia was behind Charlie Kirk as a man, there’s evidence to me that that has died off,” Shepherd says. “Now, ideologues and funders, those people are still invested in stirring the pot and poking the fire and keeping it alive.”
Shepherd says that universities should be more courageous in calling out hate among their students.
“We’ve seen how administrators have buckled under pressure from free speech absolutists on the right,” Shepherd says. “What administrators and media organizations that cover higher ed can do is recognize right-wing hate speech for the threat that it is, and be brave enough to protect the speech of their most marginalized students.”
In just the first year of the second Trump administration, the federal government has taken action to pull back or erase key sources of data about LGBTQ people. These data losses are occurring as the administration aggressively advances an anti-LGBTQ—and particularly anti-transgender—policy agenda.
New research by The Williams Institute finds that approximately 360 federal data collections have removed at least one sexual orientation and/or gender identity (SOGI) measure, the majority of which specifically target transgender, nonbinary, and gender expansive people.
In response, today the Movement Advancement Project (MAP) released a new report that reviews recent progress in federal LGBTQ data collection, documents the scope and consequences of current demographic data removals and rollbacks, and outlines strategies and resources to promote accountability and responsible data governance in an increasingly hostile federal environment. A Shifting Data LandscapeAfter years of substantial progress to strengthen federal data collection on underserved communities, including LGBTQ populations, under the Biden administration, President Trump’s Executive Order 14168 quickly sought to dismantle any and all institutionalized improvements in federal SOGI data collection processes. The executive order, which seeks to redefine sex for all federal policy purposes as binary and immutable, led to federal agencies removing SOGI data measures on existing data collections, prohibiting their future collection, and stopping ongoing methodological research.
The report explains the critical nature of these data, which enable policymakers, researchers, and service providers to identify disparities, allocate resources equitably, and deliver effective programs and services that respond to the needs of LGBTQ communities. The systematic removal of these measures renders LGBTQ people and their experiences invisible, obscuring the real-world harms and other impacts of policy decisions. Recent ChangesDue to 83% of SOGI removals not undergoing a formal public notice-and-comment period, little public visibility has been given to these changes. The report includes a list of concrete examples of removals that have occurred over the past 12 months, including the Household Pulse Survey, American Housing Survey, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, the National Crime Victimization Survey, and many more.
In addition, the report brings attention to the Census Bureau’s recent decision to halt research assessing the feasibility of adding gender identity measures to the American Community Survey, the nation’s premier survey used to shape evidence based policy decisions, allocate trillions of dollars in public resources, and support enforcement of civil rights laws to protect people from discrimination. Hiding Harms & Masking Policy Impacts The elimination of federal LGBTQ data is part of a larger agenda. That agenda includes cuts to Medicaid, restrictions on gender-affirming care, cancelation of LGBTQ health research dollars, elimination of civil rights protections and attempts to deny the reality that transgender, nonbinary, gender expansive, and intersex people exist and have rights under the law. When SOGI data are selectively erased, altered, or suppressed, it becomes harder to track disparities, enforce civil rights laws, allocate resources fairly, or evaluate whether policies are working as intended.
“Removing SOGI data is not a neutral administrative change; it is a mechanism that obscures harm, limits accountability, and weakens the evidence base needed for effective and equitable policymaking and governance. The rapid elimination of these critical data ensures that harms driven by these anti-LGBTQ policies are more difficult to detect, measure, and challenge.”
— Caroline Medina, MAP’s Senior Advisor for Data Policy and Strategy
Moreover, the increased misuse and weaponization of data has led to increased distrust by underserved communities, which discourages participation, degrading data quality, and reinforcing cycles of invisibility and exclusion.
While LGBTQ communities may be among some of the first to feel these harms, the consequences extend far beyond any single population. Paths Ahead Currently, a range of accountability efforts are underway to monitor data removals, challenge unlawful actions, and support ethical, responsible SOGI data collection both at and beyond the federal level.
As the federal government withdraws from collecting SOGI data, it is increasingly critical that states, nonprofits, academic institutions, and private entities ensure ethical, responsible, and well-governed data practices. The report offers recommendations for those interested in LGBTQ-inclusive data collection, in addition to a short list of resources that have been developed to help researchers, policy experts, advocates, and the public understand the evolving landscape of federal data collection, access inclusive datasets, support ongoing advocacy and accountability work, and promote good data governance.
“SOGI data are essential building blocks to help understand how policies are affecting real people, and where interventions are most urgently needed,” Medina added. “Taking action to promote accountability, scientific integrity, and transparency, while combating misuse and protecting communities, is paramount.”
To schedule an interview with a MAP researcher or for questions, please contact Dana Juniel at dana@mapresearch.org. # # # About MAP: MAP’s mission is to provide independent and rigorous research, insight and communications that help speed equality and opportunity for all. MAP works to ensure that all people have a fair chance to pursue health and happiness, earn a living, take care of the ones they love, be safe in their communities, and participate in civic life. www.mapresearch.org
Sgt. Deon Jones, a gay, 24-year veteran officer with the Department of Corrections (DOC) in Washington, D.C. got a big payout with the district’s decision last week to award him $500,000 to resign, effectively immediately.
The city admitted no fault in a lawsuit Jones brought that accused department and city officials of anti-gay discrimination.
It’s the third lawsuit Jones has filed against the same parties over his long tenure with the department, and the latest to yield a settlement. He previously sued in 2006 for discrimination and harassment, with the city settling in 2011. They settled another dispute over his treatment at the DOC in 2019.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed the latest complaint in 2021, along with the white-shoe law firm WilmerHale, representing the corrections officer.
Jones first began working for the DOC in 1992, was laid off in 2001, and returned in 2006. He retires from the city agency as a medical liaison with the rank of sergeant.
“This is a horrific pattern of discrimination and retaliation that was known to the highest-level officials and ignored,” Scott Michelman, the Legal Director of ACLU District of Columbia, said in 2021 when the latest suit was filed.
While working at the DOC-managed D.C. Jail, Jones “endured pervasive acts of harassment based on his sexual orientation” that were so bad, he eventually suffered more than 15 panic attacks and was diagnosed both with PTSD and Major Depressive Disorder, the ACLU said in a summary of the case that accompanied the complaint.
The lawsuit named Jones’ supervisors as well as D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) as defendants who enacted or failed to stop the “loss of wages, loss of benefits, mental anguish, emotional distress, personal humiliation, indignity, embarrassment, inconvenience, stigma, pain and suffering, and damages to [Jones’s] personal and professional reputations.”
Jones alleged that in addition to regular abuse and threats from inmates, his own co-workers and fellow correctional staff called him slurs and verbally abused him: some told Jones they “don’t like f**got[s] or sissies,” and “hate working with f**gots.” The complaint alleged he was repeatedly called “f**got, “old f**got,” “f**got mess,” and “d**k eater” by DOC co-workers and even senior staff.
Not only did Jones receive verbal disrespect, but he often had his “safety at risk” because other officers refused “to answer his calls for assistance over the internal radio system when he was responding to inmates or attempting to execute his duties,” according to the complaint.
Jones also alleged that he was “almost raped” when he was left alone in an elevator with “an inmate who said he would cut my throat.” He said a supervisor was on duty at the time, but did nothing to help him.
“For years, I showed up to do my job with professionalism and pride, only to be targeted because of who I am,” Jones said after the award was announced. “This settlement affirms that my pain mattered — and that creating hostile workplaces has real consequences.”
Added the former officer: “For anyone who is LGBTQ or living with a disability and facing workplace discrimination or retaliation, know this: you are not powerless. You have rights. And when you stand up, you can achieve justice.”
The UK’s asylum system’s designation of Nigeria as a “safe country” poses real risk to queer Nigerians facing persecution, reporter Daniel Anthony outlines for PinkNews.
Under UK asylum policy, Nigeria is treated as a country that is generally stable rather than affected by civil war, active conflict, or a failing government. It is listed as a safe country of origin for men, meaning UK authorities presume that, in general, there is no serious or widespread risk of persecution or indiscriminate violence.
However, for queer Nigerians, this perception of safety is misleading and dangerous.
In Nigeria, safety can disappear with a whisper, a hint of effeminacy, a phone search, a neighbour’s suspicion, or the arrival of police who know that Nigeria’s homophobic laws will protect them and justify whatever horrific fate they are about to impose on you.
Nigeria prohibits same-sex relationships under federal law. The Same-Sex Marriage (Prohibition) Act (SSMPA), enacted in 2014, criminalises same-sex relationships and in several northern states, Sharia-based penal codes impose severe penalties, including the death penalty.
Weeks later, in September, a young gay man named Hillary was thrown from a three-story building to his death because of his sexual orientation. Earlier this year, during New Year celebrations in northern Nigeria, two underage girls were stoned to death after being accused of lesbianism, without evidence, trial, or mercy.
Perhaps the most widely reported case is the murder of Abuja Area Mama, a well-known TikTok creator and LGBTQI+ figure. In August 2024, her stabbed and mutilated body was found by the roadside in Nigeria’s capital. No suspects have been identified, and the case remains unsolved — a grim reminder of how easily fatal violence against queer people fades into silence.
Often, violence against queer people in Nigeria is not condemned but celebrated. Videos of beatings, abuse and public humiliation circulate widely online, filmed by bystanders and shared for entertainment. Comment sections fill with applause, mockery, and calls for harsher punishment, signalling that violence against LGBTQI+ people is not only tolerated but socially rewarded. In this environment, harm is learned early, repeated often, and carried out with impunity — collapsing any meaningful distinction between mob violence and state violence.
Rights groups say this is not exceptional. In 2023, more than 1,000 violationsbased on real or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity were recorded, and in 2024, civil society monitors documented 556 violations affecting over 850 people — a snapshot they believed to represent only a fraction of actual unreported incidents.
One common form of abuse is “KITO”, where queer men are lured online, taken to private locations, beaten, filmed, and blackmailed — with videos sent to families and threats of exposure or death if ransoms are not paid.
Survivors report that this cycle of abuse, which accounts for about 70 per cent of the mistreatment of queer individuals in Nigeria, has driven many victims to despair and suicide.
One gay man from Nigeria, now living in the UK after being granted asylum, described how a “KITO” attack permanently altered the course of his life, an experience that left him deeply traumatised and suicidal.
“That incident ruined my life,” he told me. “I tried taking my own life, but it didn’t work. I was depressed and I became a shadow of myself.”
He said the psychological damage outlasted the physical violence. Returning to daily life in Nigeria after his exposure meant living under constant ostracization, repeated attacks, and public scrutiny.
“There was no safety after that,” he said. “You’re just waiting for the next thing to happen.”
With the help of a friend, he eventually fled and sought asylum in the UK.
The contrast, he said, was stark.
“I spent 30 years of my life in Nigeria. But in just over a year here, I’ve had more peace than I ever had back there,” he said. “I would rather jump in front of a speeding bus — than relive that experience again. That kind of life, I wouldn’t wish it on anybody.”
What haunts him most, he added, is not only what he survived, but the people he left behind.
“There are still men like me back there, dealing with this every day,” he said. “That’s what breaks my heart.”
This is the reality many queer Nigerians are fleeing — and the context UK asylum policy increasingly fails to account for.
Under the UK government’s proposed asylum reforms, safety is being treated as a fixed for a nation, assessed from a distance and applied broadly. As the asylum system tightens, claims are judged less on lived risk and more on whether a country is deemed generally “safe”.
For LGBTQI+ Nigerians, whose danger is constant and systemic, this approach is especially dangerous.
In practice, this logic misreads how persecution operates. The violence enabled by Nigeria’s Same-Sex Marriage (Prohibition) Act — police extortion, arbitrary arrests, mob attacks — is routinely treated as incidental rather than structural. When asylum seekers raise these experiences in the UK system, they are often dismissed as isolated incidents or deemed insufficiently severe, leaving LGBTQI+ applicants with an almost impossible evidentiary burden.
This is where the UK’s latest reforms, which would make refugee status contingent on a country of origin never becoming safe, become dangerous and further reinforce misconceptions. By relying more heavily on country-of-origin designations, the system shifts away from group-specific risk and toward blanket assessments that assume danger must be universal to be credible.
But queer persecution rarely works that way.
LGBTQI+ people are targeted precisely because they are minorities. Their persecution is localised, informal, and socially enforced — carried out by families, vigilantes, or corrupt officials rather than through formal state channels. These realities rarely leave paper trails and do not fit neatly into asylum frameworks that privilege documentation and national stability over lived risk.
How does one document a lynching that no authority investigated?
How does one prove the constant threat of exposure in a society, where queerness itself is treated as criminal intent?
Charities supporting LGBTQI+ asylum seekers warn that this gap routinely leads to wrongful refusals, even as the Home Office acknowledges that LGBTQI+ people from countries like Nigeria face persecution. Rainbow Migration has assisted Nigerians whose claims were rejected by the UK government on credibility grounds, overlooking the surveillance, blackmail, and violence faced by queer individuals in the country.
This is both a moral and legal failure. According to the 1951 Refugee Convention, individuals persecuted for their sexual orientation or gender identity are entitled to protection, regardless of their country’s overall safety. International law only requires that the risk of persecution is real and that the state fails to provide protection.
There is also a history that remains largely unacknowledged.
Nigeria’s criminalisation of same-sex relationships is rooted in British colonial rule, which imposed sodomy laws later absorbed into postcolonial legal systems and currently being reinforced by political and religious leaders. Yet when queer Nigerians seek asylum, Britain positions itself as a neutral evaluator of safety — without reckoning with its role in shaping the danger they are fleeing.
If the UK is genuinely committed to its human rights obligations, it must reject the misleading simplicity of “safe country” narratives. The safety of minorities cannot be determined by national averages. Asylum systems should be evaluated not on how effectively they exclude people, but on whether they adequately protect those who are most in need.
For queer Nigerians, asylum is not a policy abstraction. It is a vital lifeline.
Europe’s parliament has agreed to a resolution declaring that trans women are women.
The resolution, adopted last week, made a host of recommendations for the EU to pursue at the 70th annual UN Commission on the Status of Women, which is set to take place next month.
Among the recommendations was a proclamation emphasising the “importance of the full recognition of trans women as women, noting that their inclusion is essential for the effectiveness of any gender-equality and anti-violence policies”.
Other proclamations referencing LGBTQ+ people included the need for a “comprehensive tool to monitor and counter democratic backsliding and backsliding in women’s rights”, as well as the acknowledgement of a rise in attacks against LGBTQ+ and women’s rights activists.
The array of recommendations were adopted in a 340-141 vote, with 68 abstentions, according to LGBTQ+ Nation.
While most European Parliament resolutions aren’t legally binding, their passage typically marks significant influence within EU member states.
Covering the convention, journalist Erin Reed suggested the resolution’s passage had put the European Union on a “direct collision course” with the United States, which will also attend the UN’s conference in New York next month.
The North American country’s LGBTQ+ rights record has plummeted following the inauguration of US president Donald Trump, who has signed a slew of executive orders targeting the community, particularly trans people.
It also comes in stark contrast to the UK government’s stance on trans rights after prime minister Keir Starmer declared that he believed trans women were not women last year.
Several countries within Europe have, themselves, begun enacting anti-LGBTQ+ policies and legislation, particularly EU member state Hungary, which enacted a ban on Pride marches last year.
Tens of thousands of Hungarians across the nation joined together to protest the law’s passage at the time, with near-daily protests taking place across June and April.
Gergely Karácsony, mayor of the Hungarian capital Budapest, faces criminal charges after defying the Pride ban in June 2025, allowing organisers to host an LGBTQ+ Pride march.
Responding to the accusations, Karácsony said on social media that he had “gone from being a proud suspect to a proud defendant”.
He added: “It seems that this is the price we pay in this country when we stand up for our own freedom and that of others.”
A large Pride flag has been removed from a flagpole at the Stonewall National Monument in Manhattan, weeks after the Department of the Interior issued federal guidance on displaying “non-agency” flags in the National Park System. Brad Hoylman-Sigal, the Manhattan borough president, said that the directive from the Trump administration, issued on Jan. 21, led to the removal of the flag from the Greenwich Village monument.
Mr. Hoylman-Sigal criticized the decision in an interview. “The mean-spiritedness of the Trump administration seems to know no bounds,” said Mr. Hoylman-Sigal, who is gay. “But we as a community are not going to take it standing by idly as our history, and by extension our human rights, are attempted to be erased.”
Mr. Hoylman-Sigal said he and other local representatives are planing to raise the flag at the monument again on Thursday. “We may be prevented from doing so,” he said. “But if we don’t seize this moment, and this outrage, I think we’ll let down generations of queer activists.”
Read the full article. Longtime JMG readers will recall Hoylman-Sigal’s tireless work for marriage equality in the New York Senate.