A federal judge has temporarily paused enforcement of the state law that prohibits diversity, equity and inclusion programs from Mississippi public schools and universities. U.S. District Judge Henry Wingate approved the request for a temporary restraining order sought by a coalition of civil rights and legal organizations on behalf of students, parents and educators.
The American Civil Liberties Union and the Mississippi Center for Justice are representing the plaintiffs, who filed the lawsuit alongside other groups on June 9 against the state’s education boards.
The order is in effect for 14 days, and allows Wingate to extend it for an additional 14 days. Next, the plaintiffs plan to seek a preliminary injunction — a longer-lasting court order that would continue to freeze the state law.
New HampshireRepublican Gov. Kelly Ayotte has gone against her party and vetoed two anti-LGBTQ+ bills and three other far-right ones.
Ayotte vetoed the bills Tuesday, while signing 101 others into law.
House Bill 324 would have barred schools from distributing books and other materials deemed “harmful to minors.” It was aimed primarily at sexual content and likely would have been used against books with LGBTQ+ characters and themes. It also would have required school districts to strengthen the process through which parents could challenge these materials.
“Current state law appears to provide a mechanism for parents through their local school district to exercise their rights to ensure their children are not exposed to inappropriate materials,” Ayotte said in her veto message. Under this law, “parents must be notified at least two weeks in advance of course materials that involve human sexuality, sexual education, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, or gender expression,” she noted. “If a parent objects in writing, New Hampshire law further requires an alternative agreed upon between the school district and the parent.”
“Therefore, I do not believe the State of New Hampshire needs to, nor should it, engage in the role of addressing questions of literary value and appropriateness, particularly where the system created by House Bill 324 calls for monetary penalties based on subjective standards,” Ayotte added. Parents who were dissatisfied could have filed lawsuits.
House Bill 148 would have let businesses and correctional facilities to classify and segregate people by sex assigned at birth rather than gender identity, affecting restroom and locker room use. State law bans discrimination based on gender identity, but under the bill, these classifications would not have been considered a violation of the law.
“I believe there are important and legitimate privacy and safety concerns raised by biological males using places such as female locker rooms and being placed in female correctional facilities,” Ayotte wrote. “At the same time, I see that House Bill 148 is overly broad and impractical to enforce, potentially creating an exclusionary environment for some of our citizens.” It could have led to lawsuits as well, she said. Her immediate predecessor as governor, fellow Republican Chris Sununu, had vetoed a similar bill.
Additionally, Ayotte vetoed House Bill 358, “which would make it easier for parents to apply for religious exemptions to child vaccine requirements in school,” House Bill 446, “which would require schools to get explicit parental permission before giving students non-academic surveys,” and House Bill 667, “which would require sex education courses to include ‘a high quality computer generated animation or ultrasound video that shows the development of the heart, brain, and other vital organs in early fetal development,’” the New Hampshire Bulletin reports. She also vetoed two budget-related bills.
It would take a two-thirds majority in both the state House and Senate to override Ayotte’s vetoes. Republicans do not have a veto-proof majority in the House.
House Democratic Leader Alexis Simpson issued a statement Tuesday praising the vetoes without mentioning Ayotte. “We’re grateful that today New Hampshire chose to protect the rights and dignity of our transgender neighbors — and House Democrats will keep fighting until every Granite Stater can live freely, openly, and safely, no matter who they are,” Simpson said, according to the Bulletin.
A gay Obama-appointed judge will preside over Donald Trump’s libel lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch and the Wall Street Journal over claims the president once sent an NSFW birthday card and doodle to the late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
Trump is suing for $10 billion after denying he ever wrote the letter, and now Judge Darrin Gayles, who became the first out gay Black man appointed as a federal judge, has been assigned to the case.
The Senate unanimously confirmed Gayles after he was appointed by former President Barack Obama in 2014. Politicopointed out he earned such widespread support for being relatively bipartisan. Two Republican governors – Jeb Bush and Charlie Crist — appointed him to Florida state judgeships before Obama appointed him to the federal bench.
The lawsuit stems from a July 17 article in TheWall Street Journal, whichallegedthat Trump contributed to a book of racy letters for Epstein’s 50th birthday in 2003. The article described Trump’s letter as containing “several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker.”
“A pair of small arcs denotes the woman’s breasts,” the description adds, “and the future president’s signature is a squiggly ‘Donald’ below her waist, mimicking pubic hair.”
The Journal also reported that the letter said, “We have certain things in common, Jeffrey… A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.”
Trump has ardently denied he wrote the letter, calling the story “fake” and claiming, “I don’t draw pictures of women.”
The president has found himself in hot water over his connections to Epstein and his administration’s recent refusal to release case files that it has long promised to share. MAGA conspiracy theorists have been chomping at the bit for the Epstein files, and many are turning on Trump as he doubles down on his administration’s decision.
Epstein died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges of sex trafficking minors. While the medical examiner determined that his death was a suicide, many people, especially on the right, do not believe that it was, instead asserting that he was killed to keep him silent about the clients for whom he found children to sexually abuse.
In February, Attorney General Bondi said that she was reviewing “a lot of names” related to the Epstein investigation and said that the Epstein list is “sitting on my desk right now to review.”
But last week, the Department of Justice released a memo that said there was no “secret client list” and reaffirmed the 2019 finding that Epstein died by suicide. Many Trump supporters were outraged that the rumored client list wouldn’t be released, while many on the left speculated that the reason Bondi wasn’t releasing it is because Trump himself – or at least high-ranking members of his administration – is on it.
Welcome to the latest edition of GLAAD’s Heroes of the Resistance, where we compile heartwarming news about leaders and changemakers who are paving a pathway towards acceptance and inclusion despite a hostile climate for LGBTQ people.
The legislative session has come to an end in most states across the country and the proposal of extreme, anti-LGBTQ bills has ended alongside it. In Florida, advocates defeated every standalone anti-LGBTQ bill introduced in the 2025 session, including an anti-DEI measure, a proposal to ban discussions of LGBTQ people and topics in the workplace, and more. In Georgia, the legislative session concluded with advocates successfully defeating multiple dangerous bills. In all, approximately 93% of all anti-LGBTQ bills introduced in 2025 in the states were defeated. To learn more and track movement in your state, check the ACLU’s interactive map of the proposed legislation.
Florida state legislature – News Service of Florida
Importantly in Utah, yet scantly covered so far by media including by the New York Times, a study commissioned by lawmakers shows the multiple benefits of health care for transgender youth, in contrast to a state ban passed in 2023. The Utah research is one of the most comprehensive studies to date, concluding that access to health care leads to “positive mental health and psychosocial functioning outcomes,” and that policies restricting such care cannot be justified by scientific findings or concerns about possible regret. Utah lawmakers are now facing pressure to rescind the baseless ban. Federal judges have already struck down such bans in Arkansas, Florida, and Montana as unconstitutional. While a narrow ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a ban out of Tennessee at the end of June, it had no impact on the approximately 25 states that can continue providing health care for transgender Americans and youth.
Advocates received another positive outcome for health care in the Kennedy v. Braidwood Management Inc. ruling at the U.S. Supreme Court at the end of June, in which the Court upheld a critical piece of the Affordable Care Act that mandates insurance companies cover preventive healthcare services at no out-of-pocket cost, including access to HIV medication. According the the Advocate, a group of Texas employers who had brought the case forward had falsely argued that covering PrEP encourages “homosexual behavior” and allegedly violated their religious freedom. In response to the ruling, GLAAD’s President and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis said: “The Supreme Court reaffirmed what so many Americans know and believe: preventive health care is a cornerstone of our health system and health decisions should be left to doctors and individuals. The fact that the Supreme Court considered derailing everyone’s access to preventive health care because of a small group of anti-LGBTQ voices reinforces how anti-LGBTQ bias is a danger to public health.”
In the heated New York City mayoral primary late last month, underdog candidate Zohran Mamdani pledged $65 million in health care for trans peopleand went on to recruit tens of thousands of volunteers in the most successful grassroots campaign in the city’s history, delivering an unexpected landslide victory despite being outspent by opponents. According to Conde Nast’s them, “Of the three mayoral candidates endorsed by the NYC Stonewall Democrats, Mamdani’s platform presented by far the most comprehensive and wide-ranging plan to protect and expand access to gender-affirming medical care to trans New Yorkers.” A few days later, Mamdani carried a trans flag in the New York City Pride March.
Everyday heroes continue making their voices heard on the federal and national levels as well. Hundreds of LGBTQ people and allies in support of the freedom to read and inclusive curriculums in schools gathered for a rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court on the day of oral arguments in Mahmoud v. Taylor in April. The “Rally for Inclusive Education” featured a diverse array of more than a dozen speakers and performers. Despite a disappointing narrow ruling in Mahmoud on behalf of a small group of parents seeking to opt their students out of LGBTQ-inclusive books and curricula, the authors and illustrators named in the case released a joint statement as well as several individual statements reaffirming their personal commitment to continue writing stories that tell the stories of underrepresented communities, so all youth can see themselves in books.
Lawyers and legal advocates continue checking off wins chipping away at the federal administration’s executive orders targeting LGBTQ Americans and other marginalized communities. In early June, a federal court granted a preliminary injunction in Lambda Legal’s lawsuit challenging Trump’s executive order to defund LGBTQ and HIV nonprofits, allowing nine nonprofits named in the case, including the Los Angeles LGBT Center and the New York City LGBTQ Community Center – two of the largest such centers in the world, serving hundreds of thousands of people – to continue providing services.
U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth recently handed a win to LGBTQ advocates when he ruled that federal law mandates that more than 600 transgender inmates continue receiving medically necessary health care. The judge said that prisons cannot arbitrarily deprive incarcerated transgender people of medications and accommodations that the Bureau of Prisons own staff has deemed appropriate. The ruling is a blow to Trump’s executive order seeking to deny care to transgender people; and indicates that denying this care causes substantial harm. The case was brought forward by Transgender Law Center and the American Civil Liberties Union.
Additionally, U.S. District Judge Julia Kobick recently granted a preliminary injunction indicating that, for now, the State Department cannot enforce President Trump’s attempt to deny gender marker changes on passports for transgender Americans or the X marker for nonbinary Americans. The win came after the ACLU sued the Trump administration over an executive order issued in January, arguing that it would ban transgender, nonbinary, and intersex Americans from obtaining necessary documentation that accurately reflects who they are and allows them to travel safely. The news means that transgender, nonbinary, and intersex Americans can immediately apply for and/or update their passports to accurately reflect who they are.
LGBTQ Americans and our allies continue to be visible and thrive despite absurd and obscene threats to basic freedoms. By elevating our wins and lifting up those who keep speaking out, we honor LGBTQ history and the truth of LGBTQ people’s right to authentic, safe, and free lives.
At least 1,334 LGBTQ+ people currently serve in elected office, but just a fraction, 63, identify as nonbinary, gender nonconforming or genderqueer. Eighteen of those representatives serve in state legislatures. That’s an achievement in growth over the past seven years, since the LGBTQ+ Victory Institute began tracking LGBTQ+ elected representation, but there’s still a long way to go.
According to the most recent data, nonbinary individuals represent around 11% of the LGBTQ+ community, making them heavily underrepresented among LGBTQ+ elected officials. Despite small numbers, their impact in politics is growing, especially at the state level, where their presence can shift narratives and policies.
As legislative bodies and our federal government work to restrict identity to the gender binary, our nonbinary elected officials are showing up and standing up for diversity and equality in politics.
These five out nonbinary LGBTQ+ elected officials are currently serving in state legislatures and will hopefully inspire others to follow in their path and serve their communities.
Insights for the LGBTQ+ community
Subscribe to our briefing for insights into how politics impacts the LGBTQ+ community and more.
Lorena Austin, Arizona
Arizona State Rep. Lorena Austin (D) | Campaign Photo
State Rep. Lorena Austin (D) made history as the first nonbinary Chicane legislator in the country and the first out nonbinary legislator in Arizona. Their deep roots in the Mesa, Arizona, community they serve make them a powerful voice in the Arizona legislature, not just for LGBTQ+ people but for all communities. Austin has advocated for issues on education, affordable housing, community resources, health care, immigration, and LGBTQ+ rights.
Izzy Smith-Wade-El, Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania state Rep. Izzy Smith-Wade-El (D) | Campaign Photo
State Rep. Izzy Smith-Wade-El (D) made history when elected to become the first out nonbinary member of the Pennsylvania state legislature. The Lancaster, PA, native served at the city level before joining the state legislature, where he helped to secure more investments in affordable housing and fought for police accountability. He has also championed bills that would protect LGBTQ+ students from gender-based discrimination and bullying, including a bill that would require gender-neutral bathrooms and locker rooms in schools undergoing new construction or renovation.
SJ Howell, Montana
Montana State Rep. SJ Howell (D) | Campaign Photo
Montana State Rep. SJ Howell (D) was one of the first two transgender lawmakers and the first nonbinary person elected to the Montana state legislature. Their presence has already made an incredible impact on the rights of LGBTQ+ Montanans. Howell made an impact this year when they were able to speak passionately on a bill that sought to grant the government the right to take transgender children away from their families. Howell’s speech flipped multiple republicans to vote against the bill and strike it down. Their work is exactly why representation matters, as it can change hearts, minds, and policies.
Wick Thomas, Missouri
Missouri state Rep. Wick Thomas (D) | Campaign Photo
Missouri state Rep. Wick Thomas (D) is the first transgender nonbinary elected official in the Missouri legislature, and they use their platform and visibility to speak out against anti-LGBTQ+ bills. Thomas’ deep commitment to social justice, education, and community informs their legislative work to improve lives of all Missourians. They have also championed LGBTQ+ rights in their work, introducing a bill in the Missouri House to repeal the same-sex marriage ban.
Emily Dievendorf, Michigan
Michigan state Rep. Emily Dievendorf (D) | Campaign Photo
State Rep. Emily Dievendorf (D) is a second-term representative in Michigan and the first out nonbinary representative in the state. A longtime equality advocate, Dievendorf previously led Equality Michigan and was appointed to the Michigan Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. Dievendorf uses her legislative platform to champion progressive policies on equality, racial justice, and domestic violence.
Blackshear, GA, native LaVonnia Moore found her purpose working in the Okefenokee and Three Rivers Regional Library Systems (TRRLS), quickly advancing from 10 hours a week as a part-time employee in 2010 to running her own branch as the Pierce County Library manager until she was unexpectedly ousted from her position on June 18, following an online campaign by the anti-LGBTQ conservative group Alliance for Faith and Family over a library book display that included “When Aidan Became A Brother,” a picture book by author Kyle Lukoff featuring a transgender character.
The library patron-led display aligned with Georgia’s summer reading theme:“Color Our World.” Young library patrons, along with their parents, were encouraged to find colorful books illustrating the state-approved theme for the display.
“I knew the theme would be an issue,” Moore said. “How are you going to color your world without the rainbow? I asked TRRLS, “Are you sure we want to stick with this theme? They said, “Go ahead, we don’t get controversy.”
Moore tells GLAAD that she was summoned to the Pierce County Library on her day off by Three Rivers Library System Director Jeremy Snell, who informed her that she was being terminated over the inclusion of the transgender-inclusive book in the summer reading display.
Snell told the Blackshear Times that the display of the book was the reason for the decision.
In an interview with reporter Ross Williams at The Georgia Recorder, one of several local news outlets working in tandem with GLAAD to amplify this story, Moore acknowledges the request of a young child accompanied by their parents to include “When Aidan Became A Brother” in the book display. Moore also said she didn’t know it at the time, but the book is about a young transgender boy whose family is expecting a new baby.
The book is written for young children and discusses Aidan’s gender identity not matching his sex at birth. It doesn’t contain anything graphic or explicit. The cover features Aidan with his family, wearing a shirt with a rainbow design.
“All I saw was Aidan becoming a big brother,” Moore said. “I saw a family with a kid wearing a rainbow sweater, and the mom was pregnant. It was a mixed family. I was like, ‘OK, sure, put it on the table.’”
The book cover of “When Aidan Became A Brother” by author Kyle Lukoff. (Image: Lee and Low Books)
Moore said she had no intention of promoting any ideology but kept books relevant to all kinds of people in the community, including LGBTQ people, immigrants, and people who speak various languages, according to The Georgia Recorder.
“We’re a public library. We need to have all items available for everyone in the community,” Moore tells GLAAD. “And just because you don’t want that community to exist, they still exist. It’s my job to serve everybody. No matter who or what they are. I grew up with the library not being [safe], and I’m like, not on my watch.”
Moore says she was living “paycheck to paycheck” before her abrupt termination and has since established a GoFundMe to help cover daily expenses, raising over $27,000 of her $30,000 goal to date, which will also go towards covering legal costs to fight what she and her attorney are describing as an unlawful firing.
Attorney Wade Herring, who represents Moore, told The Advocate that the firing was unlawful and politically driven.
“It may be a First Amendment issue. It may be a Title VII issue, which protects employment,” Herring said. “I think it was content-based censorship and politically motivated, and she lost her job.”
Herring insists Moore followed library policy and simply facilitated community participation. “She had a local family and a local child who was enthusiastic about the library and the summer reading program,” Herring said. “What was she supposed to do, tell the child, ‘No, your book doesn’t belong?’ She was encouraging and supporting a child.”
GLAAD highlighted how Moore’s service helps all in the community, and how the unjust termination is harmful.
“No one should lose their job for doing their job,” GLAAD told The Advocate. “Librarians and other educators are professionals and public servants who work for every child and family in the community, offering materials that help children learn about themselves, their peers, and the world around them. The world is a far more interesting and colorful place than book banners ever want to see. Book banners and other opponents of LGBTQ people and equality shouldn’t get to censor, dim, or dictate what is available to other families and readers. Libraries should always be a place where everyone in the community can feel safe to explore, learn, and grow.”
Creating a safe space for all Pierce County residents is why the 15-year library professional views her work as an investment not only in the current patrons but also the younger Moore, who never felt welcome in her home library as a teen.
“I would go there, pick up my book, and leave,” Moore said. “It just wasn’t a place that felt like it was welcoming to young people. They didn’t have programs [for youth]. I want everybody that walks through the library to feel like it’s there for them,” and that includes LGBTQ families, Moore said.
LaVonnia Moore (center) pictured with young library patrons in her previous role as Pierce County Library manager. (Image: LaVonnia Moore)
Community Pressure to Reverse Termination
In recent days, Moore has experienced an avalanche of community support following the revelation of electronic communications between library and county officials directly involved in her firing, which journalists uncovered through an open records request by The Georgia Recorder and The Advocate.
The internal communications paint a picture of officials responding directly to political pressure rather than to any professional misconduct,” according to a review by The Advocate. “Moore, for her part, said she was told she was terminated solely for “poor decision in the line of performance duty.”
The county produced 77 files showing about four times as many people contacted the government in favor of reinstating Moore than did in favor of firing her, reports The Georgia Recorder.
“The emails, text messages, and voicemail reveal more about the decision to let Moore go and the resulting backlash. That correspondence also shows that local officials are considering reinstating Moore but have not yet done so,” The Georgia Recorder also reports.
“It is within the power of this board to make action calling for reinstatement if that is a desired result of the executive session discussion,” Snell wrote. “At this point, I have received more communication regarding reinstatement (than) I did regarding the original issue earlier this week.”
Moore’s firing has already exacted a steep personal price. She said her reputation has been damaged, and she now faces the prospect of leaving her hometown of 46 years because no other library jobs are available nearby.
As for “When Aidan Became A Brother,” Moore said the book is still on the shelf inside Pierce County Library.
“That book still exists in the collection — because it belongs there. It reflects real families. Real kids. Real love,” Moore wrote on her GoFundMe page. “Although I did not choose the book myself, I stand ten toes down on this truth: The library is a public space. All community members should feel welcome inside it and have equal access to its resources.”
When Arden was 16, they called a suicide crisis hotline “thinking their life was over.”
They were in an abusive relationship, regularly self-harming, and felt that nothing was helping. “It was terrifying,” they told Uncloseted Media.
“If it weren’t for the hotline, I would have killed myself.”
Since that day, Arden, now 24 years old and living in Brooklyn, has used various crisis helplines. When the 988 national suicide prevention hotline launched a “Press 3” option in 2022 for LGBTQ youth, they immediately started using the resource.
Arden, who identifies as nonbinary, says the LGBTQ hotline workers “respected their identity” and were understanding that they are not a woman. “It was really affirming for a very troubling time in my life.”
Since then, Arden has “Pressed 3” more times than they can remember, seeking help for everything from dealing with the loss of their friend, who died by suicide, to “stupid cliquey gay people stuff.”
“I remember when my friend had killed himself and I was dealing with a lot. I called them and they talked to me for over an hour because I was really upset,” they say. “When I called the hotline, it was a last resort. I was really at my wits’ end.”
Arden—whose last call to the lifeline was two weeks ago—is one of 1.3 million callers and chatters the LGBTQ youth hotline has served since it launched, according to federal data. The legislation that greenlit the national program, signed by Trump in 2020 during his first term, explicitly recognized that LGBTQ youth are more than “4 times more likely to contemplate suicide than their peers, with 1 in 5 LGBTQ youth and more than 1 in 3 transgender youth reporting attempting suicide.”
Photo by Kaoly Gutierrez for Uncloseted Media.
This new option to “Press 3” allowed queer youth in crisis the ability to directly connect with counselors from a set of specialized LGBTQ crisis centers. These counselors are trained in cultural competency and often bring lived experience, providing identity‑affirming, empathetic support for challenges like coming out, discrimination or mental health crises.
Despite the hotline’s success, the Trump administration announced last month that they would be shutting it down on July 17, claiming that the service had run out of congressionally directed funding. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration said in an email to Uncloseted Media that “continued funding of the Press 3 option threatened to put the entire 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline in danger of massive reductions in service.”
“This is absolutely a mistake,” a suicide prevention call center director told Uncloseted Media. “We are concerned that this will result in increased suicide rates for LGBTQ youth.”
Why We Need Option 3
The director’s concern is supported by a 2022 research brief that found that queer college students with access to LGBTQ-specific services were 44% less likely to attempt suicide than those without it. Research also shows that a hotline specific to LGBTQ services increases the likelihood of queer youth calling.
“It’s true for any direct service,” Harmony Rhoades, associate research professor of sociology at Washington University, told Uncloseted Media. “People who are in substance use recovery want to work with people who’ve gone through recovery themselves because they understand what that experience is. Culturally, there is not a lot of understanding of the specific experiences of someone who is LGBTQ and without specific training, a crisis counselor isn’t going to be able to know the language that’s going to feel affirming.”
Gemma Brown near High Point, North Carolina. Photo by Kaoly Gutierrez for Uncloseted Media.
“Connecting with someone who gets it was really helpful. … Because at home, I was so isolated and I didn’t really interact with other queer people,” says Gemma Brown, who used the Trevor Project’s chat function at 10 years old.
“I was an extremely self-loathing, suicidal kid who was under the impression that God hated me and I was gonna burn in hell for eternity,” Brown, now 15 and living in High Point, North Carolina, told Uncloseted Media.
“I only used the chat feature because I was scared my parents would hear me. We shared a wall,” she says. “I was spiraling really bad. I’d just realized I was crushing on girls, and I thought I was going to burn in hell for all eternity because that is what we are taught.”
Raised in a Southern Baptist Church, Brown never felt safe at home, where her father would regularly spit slurs like “faggots” and “queers.” At church, every sermon was about Sodom and Gomorrah or about how “real love” only existed between a man and a woman.
“I grew up knowing the number one thing not to be was one of the ‘dirty queers,’” she says. “I kept thinking, I can kill myself now and go to hell, or live longer and still go to hell. I used to have panic attacks at 9, 10 years old, just thinking about burning in hell perpetually.”
Brown remembers Caitlin, the chat counselor who helped her, being the first ever to tell her that queer love was valid.
“She told me she’d been with her girlfriend for seven years. I didn’t even believe queer people could be happy. … It broke my brain in the best possible way,” says Brown, who is now out and proud to her parents, who have come around, and to most of her friends on social media.
Gemma and her Mom, Melanie. Photo by Kaoly Guttierez for Uncloseted Media.
Arden had a similar experience. “The queer line is better than the regular line,” they say. “I feel like it’s less like going through a checklist on the queer line.”
As a survivor of sexual assault, Arden says knowing that the counselors on the other line were trained in LGBTQ-specific trauma made it easier to reach out for help. “My voice doesn’t pass per se but they still respected my identity,” they say.
LGBTQ-specific resources for youth are critical, with 41% seriously considering suicide in 2024. In addition, queer youth are disproportionately affected by a litany of mental health issues and trauma, including physical and sexual assault, anxiety, depression, eating disorders, bullying and addiction.
“It’s not like we’re cherry-picking some random group,” says Rhoades. “If we are going to fund [suicide prevention], there is no reason we should do it inefficiently by not effectively targeting the people who need it most. So yes, they need specific suicide prevention services.”
While the hotline focuses on LGBTQ youth, they don’t turn away adults who need help. Joshua Dial, 36, says that when he called 988, he was often connected to the LGBTQ youth hotline after mentioning that he’s gay.
“I always walked away feeling better after I called,” he says. “There have been times when I spoke to the regular 988 crisis people, and they helped too. But they didn’t understand quite as much.”
Dial, a Lutheran who lives in Stillwater, Oklahoma, says he wasn’t always comfortable being open about his sexual orientation to his religious community and that the only way to meet other gay people was on hook-up and dating apps, which he notes are “not for emotional support.”
“I wouldn’t be talking to my pastor about getting on Grindr. I can’t go to my pastor and tell them what I did last weekend,” he says.
Photo courtesy of Dial.
Dial, who was raised to believe that homosexuality is a sin, has experienced depression since the age of 16 and has also struggled with bipolar disorder, addiction and PTSD. “My addiction was getting worse, and the only constant was that the line was always available,” he says. “I didn’t have any other options, but I knew that if I called the hotline, I would get help.”
Dial says the emotional support he received through these phone calls kept him from self-harm and suicide. “There are times when I called that number and was this close to taking a handful of pills, this close to slitting my wrist, this close to buying a gun to shoot myself. And I talked to those people, and they not only understood, but they gave me the empowerment of knowing that someone had my back.”
How Cutting Option 3 Affects the Whole System
While the cuts are only meant to affect the hotline’s support for LGBTQ youth, crisis center employees say they’ll impact the entire 988 network.
“This being rifted does very much mean less capacity for 988 as a whole,” says the suicide prevention call center director. “Everyone will be affected.”
“When the LGBTQ hotline opened up, it really lowered the volume on the mainstream counselors,” a 988 hotline counselor in Washington state told Uncloseted Media. “It seemed really helpful, and I didn’t get a lot of LGBTQ chats after that point.”
The counselor at the Washington state center says they are about to lay off 42 counselors from their LGBTQ hotline. They say these roles won’t be replaced on the main 988 line due to a hiring freeze. Because of this, counselors expect the number of calls they receive to double, which could dramatically increase wait times. The Washington state center did not respond to a request for comment.
Even without the cuts, wait times are an issue. A 17-year-old caller from Virginia says that even the 10 minutes they had to wait for their call to be answered were painful. “I was worried that nobody would want to talk to me. I was just feeling hopeless,” they say. “There’s this one resource that I’m supposed to be able to have access to 24/7, but it just isn’t as accessible as it should be. For some people, those 10 minutes are crucial.”
In a 2009 study of 82 patients referred to a psychiatric university hospital after a suicide attempt, nearly half reported that the period between their first thought of suicide and their actual attempt had lasted 10 minutes or less, underscoring how shorter wait times can be a matter of life and death.
“If we are not able to catch someone during the time that suicidal thoughts have appeared and intervene as quickly as possible, they could start figuring out how they’re going to kill themselves and make it happen,” says the suicide prevention call center director. “And a lot of folks have access to means that can result in instant death like firearms.”
What Can Be Done?
With the “Press 3” option gone, Rhoades worries that the current spate of anti-LGBTQ legislation and hateful rhetoric toward the community will affect how counselors without queer-specific training will provide care.
“We’re living in an unprecedented time where anti-LGBTQ hatred is being normalized,” she says. “It absolutely affects how young people are treated. And it filters down to crisis counselors.”
As Congress and the Trump administration prepare to shut down “Press 3” on July 17 in an effort to save money, many believe that it will have the reverse effect.
“They just want these people to die. … That’s the message I got,” says a hotline operator in Washington state, adding that the administration is “not looking at the bigger picture.”
Arden says they wouldn’t be here today without the line’s support. “I’ve been struggling for a long time in my life [with] self-harm and I’ve been clean almost two years now,” they say. “I would definitely not be clean if it weren’t for the hotline and I would probably hurt myself again.”
LGBTQ Crisis Helplines Still Available:
The Franklin County Youth Psychiatric Crisis Line: 614-722-1800
The Huckleberry House for youth experiencing homelessness also offers a teen crisis shelter helpline: 614-294-5553
The Trevor Project has a crisis hotline: 1-866-488-7386
If objective, nonpartisan, rigorous, LGBTQ-focused journalism is important to you, please consider making a tax-deductible donation through our fiscal sponsor, Resource Impact, by clicking this button:
Senior White House adviser and Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller has played a central role in shaping policies in both Trump administrations. He had a key role in the first Muslim travel ban, the first trans military ban and various initiatives to erode the rights of trans students. In Trump 2.0, Miller has either written or edited all of the more than 160 executive orders the president has signed so far.
In 2021, Miller—who is not a lawyer—founded America First Legal (AFL), a right-wing organization designed to fight the so-called “woke agenda” in courtrooms across the U.S. AFL’s goal is to function as a legal battering ram against Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, LGBTQ rights, reproductive rights and immigration. The group has rapidly become a key player in the broader conservative movement, launching over a hundred lawsuits, complaints and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to serve as the Trump administration’s legal attack dog. AFL actively “forum shops,” filing lawsuits in spaces where judges have shown conservative leanings.
Here are the key moves AFL has made on LGBTQ issues.
April 6, 2021
Miller launches AFL. In a statement, he describes his vision for the organization:
“America First Legal is the long-awaited answer to the ACLU. We are committed to an unwavering defense of true equality under law, national borders and sovereignty, freedom of speech and religion, classical values and virtues, the sanctity of life and centrality of family, and our timeless legal and constitutional heritage. Through relentless litigation and oversight we will protect America First, Last, and Always.”
Aug. 25, 2021
AFL filesa lawsuit on behalf of two Texas doctors against Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Xavier Becerra. The doctors object to an HHS notice that states that a law that bars “sex” discrimination in federally-funded health care also protects LGBTQ people from discrimination. The doctors say that this could pressure them to administer or refer patients to gender-affirming treatments they oppose. In December 2024, the case is thrown out due to lack of standing.
AFL files a formal civil rights complaint against Morgan Stanley, claiming the company’s Freshman Enhancement Program, which aimed to help minorities overcome systemic barriers of entry into the financial field, was racist and sexist against white men. Morgan Stanley would quietly shutterthe program in 2024.
July 2022
A month after Roe v. Wade is overturned, AFL files civil rights complaints against Dick’s Sporting Goods and Lyft for company policies that help employees pay for travel expenses related to out-of-state abortions.
Oct. 26, 2022
In the lead up to the midterm elections, AFL sends out mailers to Spanish-speaking voters that accuse “Joe Biden and his allies on the left” of “indoctrinating your children,” and “[i]njecting young children with female hormones given to sex offenders to cause sterilization.” The mailers also include an altered photo of Dr. Rachel Levine, falsely writing that she promotes the “chemical and surgical castration of boys and girls.”
Photo by Denver Post.
Jan. 25, 2023
AFL sues the West Shore School District of Pennsylvania, alleging their Social Emotional Learning curriculum violates parents’ rights to their children’s moral and religious education because there was no option to opt out. AFL took particular issue with the curriculum’s “virtues and values.” The court would side with AFL.
April 2023
AFL files a federal civil rights complaint against Anheuser-Busch and requests that an investigation take place for their hiring, promoting and job-training employment practices. The complaint is filed in part because of a recent Bud Light marketing campaign that featured transgender actress and influencer Dylan Mulvaney. AFL would file nearly identical complaints against McDonald’s, BlackRock and Mars.
Photo by w_lemay.
April 21, 2023
AFL is listed on the advisory board for Project 2025—the 920-page policy blueprint that recommends overturning a variety of LGBTQ rights. Miller later has AFL removed because of negative attention.
May-August 2023
AFL files a barrage of lawsuits, complaints and FOIA requests against a litany of companies, including Microsoft, Unilever, Nordstrom, PricewaterhouseCoopers and Kellogg’s for their DEI initiatives. In a FOIA request, they claim Microsoft purposefully laid off natural-born citizens in favor of hiring foreign workers who they can pay a lower wage. For the complaint against Unilever, they took issue with the language in their application process that says, “Where legally possible, we consider racial and ethnic diversity in our recruitment.”
Sept. 6, 2023
AFL sues the Association of Independent Commercial Producers (AICP) on behalf of a white man who alleges he was forced to report to an inexperienced Black employee as a result of AICP’s Double the Line program. AFL claims that the program, which aimed to help people of color overcome barriers of entry in the entertainment industry, is racist toward white people. In a statement, AFL wrote:
“For many decades, New York and Federal law have prohibited discrimination based on race, color, national origin, and sex. The Defendants, with their morally twisted “woke” view that racism, bigotry, and sexism actually are perfectly fine … have arrogantly declared themselves above the law. … The Defendants here, and the entertainment industry more generally, will soon find out that the cost of racialist virtue signaling has gone up.“
Oct. 5, 2023
AFL files a federal civil rights complaint against the MLB’s diversity programs, claiming these policies unlawfully favor women and Black and Brown people.
In March 2025, the MLB removes all mentions of diversity from their website and releases a statement saying: “We are in the process of evaluating our programs for any modifications to eligibility criteria that are needed to ensure our programs are compliant with federal law as they continue forward.”
While the MLB did not cite the complaint, some speculated that the league may have bowed to AFL and Trump’s demands to avoid having their antitrust legal exemption revoked.
AFL would later hit other sporting leagues with similar complaints, including the NFL and NASCAR.
Oct. 19, 2023
AFL sues New York University on behalf of a first-year law student, who baselessly claims the university discriminates against white men when selecting members and editors for the Law Review. “Law review editors take heed. Any subordination of academic merit to ‘diversity’ considerations when selecting members or articles will be met with a lawsuit,” AFL says in a statement.
Nov. 1, 2023
AFL files federal civil rights complaints againstAmerican Airlines, Southwest Airlines and United Airlines for corporate DEI initiatives that aim to promote minorities so that company leadership is more representative of their customers. A year later, allthreeairlines would ground their DEI hiring practices.
Nov. 20, 2023
AFL sues Mesa Public Schools and their superintendent, alleging that teachers and administrators are “encouraging and assisting students to identify as members of the opposite sex without notifying parents” and helping with the “facilitation of sex transition.” Legal advisers concluded the district’s policies comply with state law, and leadership says no medical transition is involved whatsoever.
Dec. 19, 2023
Just in time for the holidays, AFL files federal civil rights complaints against Mattel and Hasbro for their DEI practices that are “promoting a radical LGBT+ agenda.” America’s biggest toy companies had sought diverse leadership through their DEI initiatives that helped gender, racial and sexual minorities overcome systemic barriers in the corporate world. But AFL sees that as unfairly tipping the scales away from white men.
Feb. 29, 2024
A script coordinator files a lawsuit with AFL against CBS/Paramount, alleging he was blocked from advancing at the company due to their DEI quotas. The lawsuit accuses the network of discriminating against straight white men. After a year, CBS and Paramount would settle by dismantling diversity hiring targets and pledging to assess future hires on merit.
AFL teams up with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to sue the Biden administration over its revised Title IX guidance that bars schools from discriminating against transgender students. “Biden’s new Title IX regulation is a vile obscenity: it forces women and girls to share locker rooms and restrooms with men. It forces them to call a he, a she, and to pretend in every way that a man is a woman, humiliating, degrading, and erasing women,” Miller says in a statement.
Photo by Gage Skidmore.
June 21, 2024
In a narrow ruling, eight employers that AFL represented in 2021 are no longer legally required to provide no-cost coverage for certain types of preventative care, including PrEP for HIV. This opens the door for larger lawsuits, which paves the way for more employers to claim that covering healthcare that disproportionately affects LGBTQ people could violatetheir religiously held beliefs, such as the idea that homosexuality is a sin.
Sept. 18, 2024
AFL files a lawsuit against California Governor Gavin Newsom for signing a bill into law that makes it harder for schools and educators to disclose a student’s LGBTQ identity to their parents. The law also allocates funding for services such as counseling for LGBTQ youth and the development of anti-harassment policies in schools.
December 2024
AFL files an amicus brief in support of Marlean Ames, a white, straight Ohio woman, who claims she was passed over for two promotions that were given to less qualified gay co-workers and that the bar to prove “reverse discrimination” is too high. The case was taken to the Supreme Court and—in June—ruled in Ames’ favor in a unanimous decision.
Feb. 12, 2025
AFL sues the Trans-Siberian Orchestra on behalf of Jessica Featherston, a lighting technician who alleges she was removed from the orchestra after reporting a transgender woman for sexual harassment when she was in the women’s locker room.
AFL and Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier sue Target. They allege that the retail giant’s corporate board put shareholders at unnecessary financial risk due to the loss of profits from DEI initiatives and the impact of LGBTQ activists, which they claim hurts the company’s bottom line.
Photo by Office of the Attorney General, State of Florida.
Feb. 24, 2025
AFL formally requests that the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs begin investigating federal contractors who are disobeying Trump’s 2025 executive order that aims to end DEI initiatives.
If objective, nonpartisan, rigorous, LGBTQ-focused journalism is important to you, please consider making a tax-deductible donation through our fiscal sponsor, Resource Impact, by clicking this button:
The Ivy League’s pages for its Women’s Center, Office for BGLTQ Student Life, and Foundation for Intercultural and Race Relations were removed Wednesday at the same time Dean of the faculty of arts and sciences, Hopi Hoekstra, revealed a new Office for Academic Culture and Community in an email to faculty shared with The Advocate.
“This new office is part of the [university’s] ongoing effort to break down silos, ensuring all members of our community are connected, supported and empowered to contribute to a thriving intellectual environment,” Hoekstra wrote. “The Office for Academic Culture and Community will serve as a resource and partner to departments, faculty, staff, and researchers as we continue to work together to foster a culture rooted in care, curiosity, and collaboration.”
Harvard has not confirmed that its centers serving women, LGBTQ+, and multicultural students will remain in place, but Hoekstra said in her email that more information would be available upon the start of the fall semester.
Donald Trump has attempted to cut all federal funding to the Ivy League while prohibiting international students from enrolling in response to the university refusing to comply with his numerous demands, including to end DEI practices and to punish students who peacefully voiced opposition to Israel’s attacks on Gaza, which the United Nationsand Amnesty International have designated as a genocide.
The Department of Health and Human Services launched an investigation into Harvard after some medical school graduates wore buttons and scarves showing support for Palestine. The administration concluded in an April letter to university president Alan Garber that the school “failed to live up to both the intellectual and civil rights conditions that justify federal investment” by permitting “anti-Semitism.” The letter also demanded that Harvard eliminate the DEI initiatives to ensure “viewpoint diversity.”
When Harvard refused, Trump froze over $2.2 billion in federal grants to the school in retaliation. The administration then pushed to further investigate anti-genocide protests on the campus by demanding detailed records about its student body, including all information about students on F1 visas, which the school also denied.
Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem announced shortly after that Harvard would no longer be allowed to enroll international students going forward, and that all current international students must somehow transfer. Harvard filed a lawsuit against the administration the next day, and a judge blocked the enrollment ban. The college filed a separate suit against the funding freeze, which is scheduled to be heard July 21.
The changes to Harvard’s LGBTQ+, women’s, and multicultural centers were announced the same day that the Trump Administration threatened to revoke the university’s accreditation through the New England Commission of Higher Education. The DHS also issued a subpoena at the same time for information about how its international students comply with immigration laws.
Jim Obergefell, who pioneered the Obergefell v. Hodges landmark same-sex marriage Supreme Court case, has warned that same-sex marriages ‘will be erased’ under the current administration of President Donald Trump.
Jim Obergefell, the American civil rights activist and lead plaintiff in the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges case, has expressed fears that under the current US administration – Republican president Donald Trump – same-sex partnerships “will be erased”.
Speaking to Out Magazine, the former Ohio representative said: “I always knew I’d be sharing my story for the rest of my life. But now it feels different.
“Now, I tell my story not just with joy but with fear—fear that this story will be erased, our marriage will be erased, that our right to say ‘I do’ will be erased.”
He continued: “We have taken some great steps forward, but with every bit of progress in our nation, we take steps back. If we don’t remind people where we’ve been, we’re going to lose it.”
“I feel fortunate that I can be a voice for our community, that I can continue to fight for those who are marginalized and vulnerable, because the LGBTQ+ community includes everyone—and we must fight for all of us,” Obergefell added.
Same-sex marriage supporter Vin Testa celebrates the anniversary of Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2023 in Washington, DC. (Getty)
Obergefell led the landmark 2015 US Supreme Court case that resulted in same-sex marriage being legalised across the United States of America.
The case ruled the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples. The ruling, which was passed 5-4 by SCOTUS, invalidated individual state laws banning same-sex marriage, and required all states to license and recognise it.
The legal battle began in 2013, when Obergefell married his terminally-ill late partner John Arthur in Maryland; after Arthur died of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a type of motor neurone disease, in October 2013, Obergefell found that he could not be listed as Arthur’s surviving spouse on his death certificate.
You may like to watch
This was because in Obergefell’s home state of Ohio, gay marriage was not legal, but in Maryland, it was.
Obergefell took his case to court, suing the state of Ohio, and it reached SCOTUS in 2015, where the ruling was passed.
The 59-year-old shared similar fears after Trump’s reelection earlier this year.
Speaking to i News at the time, he said, “The only thing people should assume is there is worse coming, and [Trump] will do anything he wants.”
He added, “It could unravel very quickly. The Supreme Court could decide ‘we’ve got these petitions from these states asking us to overturn it, we think they’re right.”
