Film Review: Women He’s Undressed

In full disclosure, I often describe myself as not being a “kid person.” And it’s true — when I came out in the early 1980s, I thought I was off the hook for getting married and having children. Whew. I chronicled my young child-free lesbian life in Tea Leaves, a memoir of mothers and daughters (2012, Bella Books):
“It was the early 1980s, a few years before lesbians were starting to take trips to the sperm banks. Most of the lesbians we knew with children had them in previous marriages — to men — and more than a few women we knew had been through painful custody battles.”
Things changed rather rapidly — but not for me. I successfully avoided the lesbian baby boom of my generation and some peer pressure to adopt. Now — safely past the child bearing and even the adopting age — I find myself wondering if LGBTQ people have changed the face of parenting — or if they what they do is any different than other (heterosexual) parents?
Society has changed, in large part, to accommodate us. But have LGBT people, in particular by parenting, changed society? Almost magically, recently published books started arriving in my mailbox to help my understanding.
Gay Fathers, Their Children, and the Making of Kinship (Fordham University Press) by Aaron Goodfellow is the most academic of the books. It quotes Michel Foucault, the innovative French philosopher, whose work much of Queer Theory is based on. In a lay person’s terms, Foucault’s work emphasizes thinking outside the box and explains how society polices itself to maintain a conservative social order. As Goodfellow writes, Foucault
“has famously described it is not the specter of two men having and enjoying sex that unsettles the social order. Rather, it is the specter of two men who have had sex living happily and tenderly ever after that proves unbearable.”
Goodfellow’s book is a survey of many different gay men who have decided to become fathers. It emphasizes that gay men being fathers challenges the social order because there are two men — not one — in charge (as opposed to Father Knows Best).
Saving Delaney, From Surrogacy to Family (Cleis Press) by Andrea and Keston Ott-Dahl chronicles the story of a lesbian couple who gave birth to a daughter with Down syndrome. The two women were already parents of two small children when they began the journey of becoming what they thought was becoming a surrogate for another lesbian couple. Saving Delaney is an honest and compelling read. The author writes of coming full circle in facing her fears and prejudices toward disabled people to loving her daughter and becoming an advocate.
Which One of You is the Mother? by Sean Michael O’Donnell is a witty page turner with heart about the author’s true story of adopting two sons with his partner. I was fascinated by the book’s revelation that the fathers decided early on that neither child would share the fathers’ last names. In the case of the oldest son, adopted when he was around the age of nine, the author/ father who is Caucasian writes that there was no reason to change his son’s name, because it was part of his past. “It was connected to his Native American heritage.”
When I picked up Queerspawn in Love, a memoir by Kellen Anne Kaiser (She Writes Press), I was skeptical. Despite the fact of having of having four lesbian mothers (in a complicated arrangement), the author writes about a conventional girl meets boy, loses herself, and gets dumped scenario. But as I turned the well-written pages, I was drawn in by the story and by the fact that this self-described “queer spawn” had different mothers to turn to for different types of advice.
Before the end of the story, I was rooting for Kellen. I certainly identified with her sentiments when she writes:
“What if I never got married, never found the right guy? I only had to look at my mothers’ lives for the answer, in the way they have found self-satisfaction outside of men — outside of partners, too, for the most part. They are happy for their own sake. Lesbians do not live in spite of or despite of men. They build their lives to their own specifications. I have learned to take comfort in the comfort they find within themselves.”
Initially, when I finished these books, I thought about the fact that LGBTQ people need allies — and one way to get allies is to parent them. But then I realized that the parents did not only influence the children. By becoming parents, the men and women in these books became more compassionate, loving people. Being a queer parent is learning to live outside the box. For one thing, they are living outside the queer box since so many of us are happily childless.
But when a child is raised intentionally, everyone involved is changed, including society.
And that’s what it’s all about.
LGBT drama Transparent leads the LGBT nominations at the Emmy’s, as Drag Race picked up its first nod.
The Amazon Original Series about a parent that comes out as trans picked up half a dozen nominations, including Outstanding Comedy Series and Outstanding Lead Actor in a Comedy Series for Jeffrey Tambor.
RuPaul has been nominated for the first time as Outstanding Host of a Reality TV show.
The drag superstar will go head-to-head with Ryan Seacrest (American Idol), Tom Bergeron (Dancing with the Stars), Jane Lynch (Hollywood Game Night), Steve Harvey (Little Big Shots) and Heidi Klum and Tim Gunn (Project Runway).
RuPaul said that he dedicated the nomination to “outsiders everywhere”.
“Brave souls who, against all odds, stick to their dreams and make the world a more colourful place. On behalf of those people – my tribe – I am so grateful,” he said.
Comedy series, Modern Family, which has previously had two wins for lovable gay dad Cameron (played by Eric Stonestreet), has received two nods.
Netflix’s Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt also got two nominations, including one for Titus Burgess in the Outstanding Lead Actor in a Comedy Series category.
Grace and Frankie’s Lily Tomlin also received a nod for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Comedy Series. The show that sees Tomlin and Jane Fonda bond, as their husbands’ leave them to be together, has recently just aired its second series on Netflix.
Game of Thrones took a lead over the rest of the pack, but Veep and The People v. OJ Simpson: American Crime Story also did well.
The 2016 Emmy awards ceremony takes place on Sunday, September 18 at the Microsoft Theatre in Los Angeles.
The show will be hosted by Jimmy Kimmel.
Jen Richards and Laura Zak / Speed of Joy Productions
The Outstanding Short Form Comedy or Drama Series category was newly added to the competition this year.
“We had hope, certainly, because we’ve seen incredible momentum and support to date,” series star Laura Zak told BuzzFeed News in a phone interview on Thursday. “Still, we all thought [a nomination] was pretty unlikely. If you see the other projects that were nominated, you can see the source of our caution.”
The other projects nominated include shows from AMC, Lifetime, Adult Swim, and ComedyCentral.com — making Her Story the only independently produced series to receive a nomination in this category.
“I’m surprised, yes, but also I’m a little bit not surprised — because, spiritually speaking, we’ve been calling this through fruition,” Angelica Ross, a series regular and prominent figure in the trans community, added in Thursday’s phone interview.
“It’s just nice to have a women-centered and powered project where we all so solid as friends and collaborators,” Zak added.
Zak credits much of the show’s success to Fisher, who used much of her own funds, plus independent fundraising, to bring Her Story to life. The entire team has been working to get the show, which is available for free on YouTube, produced as a full series.
“Her believing in the project and putting her money where her mouth was — and throughout it all be loving and humble — we couldn’t have done it without her.”
“With this Emmy nomination, this will open up Her Story to an even wider audience,” Ross added.
Transcendence Theatre Company presents Dance the Night Away August 5-7, 12-14, and 19-21 featuring show-stopping dance numbers celebrating tap to Fosse and everything in between combined with powerful vocal performances to create a rousing evening of
entertainment.
”Dance the Night Away” will pay tribute to many well-known dancers and singers sharing some
of their most popular music,” remarked show director Tony Gonzalez. He continues his description of
the show: “The concept of ‘dancing the night away’ actually goes beyond the standard idea of dancing.
This is about getting lost in the joy of movement and music, which is really something anyone can
experience.”
Audiences familiar with “Broadway Under the Stars” shows will not only see a new show when
they attend Dance the Night Away, but will discover some distinctive transformations to the
performance space. “We know everyone cherishes the special atmosphere of the Winery Ruins, which
of course will continue, but we are excited to change things up a bit with the set which we hope will
surprise and delight our regular patrons,” Gonzalez promises.
The performers scheduled to appear in Dance the Night Away include Alicia Albright, Allyson
Carr, Amanda Lehman, Amy Miller, Brad Surosky, Bryan Buscher-West, Casey Hebbel, Colin Campbell
McAdoo, Correy West, David R. Gordon, Dean de Luna, Dylan Smith, Eric Jackson, Erika Conaway,
Jacqueline Arnold, Jessica Lee Coffman, Keri Safran, Kiira Schmidt, Leslie McDonel, Matthew Rossoff,
Meggie Cansler, Michael Callahan, Nick Dalton, Stephan Stubbins, and Thomasina Gross.
Transcendence’s Broadway Under the Stars, now in its 5th season, is an award-winning series of
Broadway-inspired concerts featuring performers from New York and Los Angeles — artists who often
come to the Sonoma stage directly from recent Broadway appearances. More than a standard musical
revue, each show weaves well-known Broadway and popular songs into a spectacular themed
performance in the open-air 150-year-old Winery Ruins at Jack London State Historic Park.
Transcendence Theatre Company, named by USA Today’s 10BEST as the #2 “Outdoor Concert Venue
You Shouldn’t Miss” in the United States, received twelve 2015 Broadway World San Francisco awards
including Best Special Theater Event for the fourth consecutive year.
All events begin with picnicking amongst the vineyards of Jack London’s historic Beauty Ranch lawn—
including gourmet food truck fare, an assortment of local wineries pouring, and pre-show music—
casting a magical spell of communal festivity and summer celebration. Sunset heralds the start of the
show and the stage begins to sparkle as dusk descends and the Broadway stars sing and dance under
a starlit nighttime sky.
“DANCE THE NIGHT AWAY” August 5-7, 12-14, 19-21
Jack London State Historic Park, 2400 London Ranch Road, Glen Ellen, CA
Pre-show picnics begin at 5:00 pm; Shows commence at 7:30 pm
Tickets to “Broadway Under the Stars” shows range from $42 to $134 and are on sale at
www.TTCsonoma.org .$5 of every ticket sold for Broadway Under the Stars shows will benefit Jack
London State Historic Park. Group tickets for all shows are available at a special discount for
individuals and organizations. Contact the box office for more details at (877) 424-1414. For more
information about Transcendence Theatre Company’s 2016 season and to purchase tickets, please
visit the website at www.TTCsonoma.org or call the box office at 877-424-1414.
About Transcendence Theatre Company:
An award-winning nonprofit arts organization comprised of artists with professional experience from
Broadway, movies, and television. The company’s featured performers have appeared on Broadway in
shows such as The Book of Mormon, Mamma Mia, Les Misérables, Chicago, La Cage Aux Follies,
Gypsy, Hairspray, Follies, 42nd Street, White Christmas, Million-Dollar Quartet, Mary Poppins among
others. Transcendence Theatre Company specializes in producing high caliber Broadway concerts in
distinctive Sonoma County locations—from their primary home within the majestic open-air ruins of the
historic winery in Jack London State Historic Park to other remarkable and stunning settings throughout wine country and the community. Since their inception in 2011, Transcendence Theatre
Company shows have been experienced by over 64,000 patrons and raised over $217,000 for Jack
London State Historic Park.
The presenting sponsor for Transcendence Theatre Company’s 2016 season is Nelson Family of
Companies. Additional sponsors include Signature Season Wine Sponsor: Benziger Family Winery,
Media Sponsor: Sonoma Index-Tribune, Premier Season Wine Sponsor: Chateau St. Jean,
Productions Sponsors: Alan and Susan Seidenfeld, Moss Adams LLP, Daryl Reese Attorney at Law,
Sonoma Media Investments, Comerica Bank, Mary’s Pizza Shack, the Sonoma Mentoring Alliance, and
business sponsors including Sotheby’s International Realty, KZST radio, Fairmont Sonoma Mission Inn
& Spa, Sonoma Market, Whole Foods Sonoma, Beau Wine Tours, Maxwell Village Cleaners, The Red
Grape, Sonoma Canopy Tours, the girl & the fig, El Pueblo Inn, Parkpoint Health Clubs, Atwood Ranch,
Friedman’s Home Improvement, Aventine Restaurant, Sonoma Valley Inn, Casa Bella Inn, Glen Ellen
Dentistry, The Dance Center Santa Rosa, Christa Granton Insurance, California State Parks, Jack
London Park Partners, Rotary Club of Sonoma Valley, Sonoma Valley Vintners and Growers, Glen
Ellen Star, Common Sense Business Solutions, Bella Vita, Olive and Vine, and over 11 nightly wine
sponsors and more than 30 pouring-partner wineries.
Your partner has been in a coma for 20 years. Because you happen to be a doctor in the hospital in which he is housed, you have spent that entire time taking care of his every need—cutting his beard, bathing him, and making sure the situation doesn’t turn into “Million Dollar Baby.” One day he abruptly awakes, and the moment is startling and emotional. Do you:
share a sweet, tender kiss
hug
exchange a hi-five
give him a handshake and a cigar?
In “Independence Day 2,” the answer is anything but 1.
Roland Emmerich’s long-awaited follow-up to his 1996 aliens-blow-up-the-White-House disaster flick picks up two decades where the original left off. You might remember Dr. Brackish Okun (Brent Spiner), the wild-eyed scientist Captain Hiller (Will Smith) and President Whitmore (Bill Pullman) meet at Area 51. It’s assumed that he died in the first installment, after being used as a human puppet by an alien, but he managed to survive. John Storey (who had a bit part in the previous feature) plays Dr. Isaacs, the loving physician who has stayed dutifully by his partner’s side.
Emmerich, who is openly gay, teased the debut of the franchise’s first gay couple in the weeks leading up to its premiere. “We don’t make a big deal out of it,” the director said. Watching the film, though, it would be easy to mistake the two men as little more than good friends; the closest the two men get to intimacy is discussing knitting and orchids. (“Who’s going to make sure you wear your pants in the morning?” one asks.) The Guardian’s Ben Lee writes that the scene is depicted with an “embarrassing Hays Code coyness.”
When it comes to straight couples, both “Independence Day” films aren’t nearly as shy. Before Hiller goes off to save Earth from alien invasion in 1996, he passionately locks lips with Jasmine, the stripper with a heart of gold played by Vivica A. Fox. (Fox and Smith even won the MTV Best Kiss Award.) Emmerich recreates that moment in the sequel after hottie orphan fighter pilot Jake Morrison (Liam Hemsworth) returns home after kicking extraterrestrial butt. Whitmore’s daughter (Maika Monroe), who also happens to be Jake’s girlfriend, runs toward him for a “welcome home” smooch. It’s reminiscent of the famous Alfred Eisenstaedt photo of a sailor kissing a nurse in Times Square, celebrating the end of World War II and the defeat of fascism.
You can blame the double standard on Hollywood homophobia, and you wouldn’t be wrong. But if “Independence Day 2” isn’t into equal opportunity PDA, it’s both reflective of an industry that’s struggling to depict the lived realities of LGBT people and a public that too often remains uncomfortable with the sight of two men kissing. While America has made enormous strides with it comes to legal recognition for same-sex couples, queer intimacy remains shockingly taboo. That stigma has toxic effects—both for cinema and society at large.
John Schlesinger’s “Sunday Bloody Sunday” is often credited as the first movie to show two men affectionately kissing on screen. There are, however, earlier examples of same-sex intimacy. The Cecil B. DeMille silent picture “Manslaughter” shows two women embracing during a Roman orgy. In 1929’s “Wings,” a man comforts his friend, stroking his hair and kissing his face, as he is dying. But “Sunday Bloody Sunday” brought what was often portrayed as subtext to the fore: Daniel Hirsch (Peter Finch), a Jewish doctor, is involved in a love triangle with a bisexual bohemian sculptor (Murray Head). Hirsch is notable as one of the few gay characters of the time who is happy and successful, portrayed without remorse or guilt about his sexuality.
The landmark film’s matter-of-fact portrayal of same-sex relationships reportedly scandalized audiences. Critic R.D. Finch remembers, “I recall seeing the movie in a theater during its first run, when the sudden—and plainly erotic—kiss between Peter Finch and Murray Head a few minutes into the film had much the same galvanic effect on the audience as Sissy Spacek’s hand popping out of the grave at the end of ‘Carrie’ a few years later: nearly the entire audience reacted collectively with a gasp of shock and surprise.”
If films like “Reflections in a Golden Eye” and “Suddenly Last Summer” intimated their characters unspoken longings, television would struggle to make those desires overt. The first same-sex kiss on television was in 1991 on “L.A. Law,” between C.J. Lamb (Amanda Donohoe) and Abby Perkins (Michele Greene). According to Greene, the brief peck was nothing but a sweeps week stunt—and it never resulted in a real relationship being developed between the two women. “Roseanne” would follow a few years later by partaking in its own lady-on-lady action, but the kiss between Barr and guest-star Mariel Hemingway is played for laughs. Roseanne even licks her sleeve after getting her first taste of the love that dare not speak its name.
The short-lived series “Hot l Baltimore,” produced by Norman Lear, gave us TV’s first gay couple back in 1975, but it wasn’t until 2000 that two men finally got their turn on the small screen: a brief Jack McPhee (Kerr Smith) and Ethan (Adam Kaufman) on “Dawson’s Creek.” Jack travels to Boston to have his “Say Anything” moment with Ethan, the college student he fell for during the WB drama’s second season. But after a short embrace, Jack discovers that the object of his affection is already spoken for. Ethan has a boyfriend.
It would seem that we’ve come a long way since CBS ordered “Picket Fences” to nix a lesbian kiss in 1993 over fears that it would alienate the show’s target audience. While shows like “Empire” and “Glee” have unapologetically featured same-sex love, “How to Get Away With Murder” became the first ever primetime show to feature interracial analingus in 2014. Freeform aired the youngest gay kiss in TV history on “The Fosters,” between 13-year-old Jude (Hayden Byerly) and his friend, Connor (Gavin MacIntosh), but it wasn’t without controversy. When Ryan Murphy’s “The New Normal” (about a gay couple who decide to adopt) debuted in 2012, it was boycotted, with some stations refusing to air it. Facing that backlash, it took a season and a half for “Modern Family” to let Mitch and Cam kiss.
More recently, a PSA for the We the Brave campaign, which seeks to educate gay and bisexual men about sexual health, was widely protested in South Africa. The TV spot was the first ever to feature two men sucking face. According to the country’s channel 24, reactions from outraged viewers ranged from “this is offensive and disgusting” to calling the commercial “a step too far.” One viewer protested, “Explain this to my daughter.” It’s extremely similar to the public backlash when former pro footballer Michael Sam kissed his boyfriend live on ESPN after finding out he was the first gay player drafted in the NFL.
ADVERTISEMENT
The controversy around Sam’s emotional PDA illustrated just how uncomfortable many Americans remain with seeing physical intimacy between queer people, especially men. According to a 2014 study from the American Sociological Review, 45 percent of respondents reported being comfortable with seeing two men kissing—even on the cheek. Thirty-eight percent of those surveyed in an Indiana University report were likewise made uneasy at the sight of men holding hands. Just 22 percent of respondents in that survey thought it was “acceptable” for a same-sex couple to French kiss in public, as compared to the 50 percent who thought the same display would be OK if the couple were heterosexual.
This isn’t just an issue for audiences who long for better LGBT representation at a time when pop culture continues to fail queer people. A study from USC Annenberg published in August showed that queer characters are “virtually nonexistent” in Hollywood’s top movies: Between the years of 2007 and 2014, just .4 percent of characters with speaking roles were LGBT-identified. A GLAAD report from 2016 showed that the number of movies with queer characters actually decreased last year. Even when gay characters are in the picture, movies like “The Imitation Game” and “Philadelphia” often treat their romantic lives with kid gloves.
advertisement
This double standard also affects queer people’s everyday realities. On June 12, an armed shooter gunned down 49 people at Orlando’s Pulse nightclub, a gay bar that acted as a crucial safe space for Florida’s LGBT community. On the evening of the attack, Pulse was hosting its monthly Latin Night. According to the gunman’s father, he was angered after seeing public displays of affection between men. “We were in Downtown Miami, Bayside, people were playing music,” Seddique Mateen told press. “And he saw two men kissing each other in front of his wife and kid and he got very angry.” The result of that rage and possible internalized homophobia, as reports suggest that the shooter may have been struggling with his sexuality, was the deadliest mass shooting in U.S. history.
Across the country, LGBT people staged a worldwide kiss-in on social media in response to the Orlando tragedy—with the hashtag #TwoMenKissing trending on Twitter in the days following the shooting. Gay and bisexual social media users posted photos of themselves embracing their partners, and the New York Times called it “an act of love and activism.” Jon Collins, who works as a television producer in Los Angeles, told the Times that he wanted to challenge the homophobic thinking that inspired the shooter. “It’s natural, it’s normal, it’s just love,” he said.
Roland Emmerich always said that “Independence Day 2” would be a small step forward for LGBT characters. “You start small and then you get bigger and bigger and bigger, and one day you have a gay character as the lead and nobody will wonder at it no more,” the director told The Hollywood Reporter back in 2015. His film, however, depicts a world that has come together after a devastating attack to make enormous progress. In “Independence Day 2,” space travel looks like the intergalactic ballet of “2001: A Space Odyssey” and flying cars dot the sky (ala “The Jetsons”). As the film explains, studying alien technology led to incredible leaps forward in human development, as well as an unprecedented era of peace.
It’s extraordinarily telling that we can envision a world where war and conflict have been resolved, but not one where two men can do something that should be so simple.
Even from the description, Elizabeth Swados book Walking the Dog sounds like a thrill; lauded as “a singular and unequaled artist,” this was the last published work that Swados wrote before she died in January of 2016. The book details the struggles of “former child prodigy and rich-girl kleptomaniac” Ester Rosenthal (aka Carleen Kepper) as she navigates a post-prison life as a high-end professional dog walker. The novel also maps the relationship between the ex-con protagonist and her hyper-religious Orthodox daughter.
The descriptions don’t do the novel justice—not only is this a story of a woman brutalized by a system that doesn’t understand or make space for those living with mental illness, it is also the story of art. And even more than that, it’s a story of the non-traditional love between a sometimes frustratingly troubled mother and her daughter.
The intro begins with the perfect summary sentence: “I’m not used to walking on grounds without fences.” Carleen (who was a child prodigy turned convict, and changed her name from Esther Rosenthal to Carleen Kepper in order to escape anti-Semitism in prison) succinctly parallels her post-release disorientation with that of training dogs. Fencing in, she says, is comforting. This is an unsettling thing for readers to read, yet somewhat intuitive, similar to receiving a diagnosis as opposed to not receiving one. Dogs need boundaries, people need boundaries.
But for Carleen/Esther there are, for better and worst, barely any boundaries. When they are presented to her, they are done so arbitrarily, or for reasons she doesn’t understand. Her brain works best within strict parameters. And while the novel does a phenomenal job of demonstrating a mind bent and harangued by the legal system, it also shows the nuance and multi-dimensionality of a person who has experienced chronic compound trauma.
This book is a beautiful and enthralling read. It manages to contain genius without presumption, illness without stigma, and characterization without oversimplification. The balance of these empathetic factors makes the novel a true work of art, and a must read.
Walking the Dog
By Elizabeth Swados
The Feminist Press
Paperback, 9781558619210, 392 pp.
– See more at: http://www.lambdaliterary.org/reviews/06/21/walking-the-dog-by-elizabeth-swados/#sthash.i75tGZlF.dpuf
When these eight men were diagnosed back in the 1980’s all the medical advice they were given was ‘prepare to die very soon’, but they didn’t, and instead they had to sit by helplessly as their lovers and all their friends faced excruciating deaths instead. “By the time they died they were ready to let go, but I was never ready to let them go” said one very plaintively. They were all unprepared to survive the fierce regime of drugs that has left its marks …..one has neuropathy as a result. Now friendless and alone and approaching senior citizenship but without any of the usual savings or nest eggs, and with their disability allowances about to be drastically cut, they face major financial problems too.
Two of the men are partnered again, but for the most part what comes over in this very compelling film, is the overwhelming feeling of sadness from them. The tagline of the film sums it up beautifully “They had the remarkable luck to survive AIDS, and the brutal misfortune to live on.” One of men professes that there is not been one single day in the past three decades that he has not thought of suicide. Another is struggling to come to terms that he has been evicted from his home of 30 years on Castro and now he has to move to a trailer in Palm Springs as he simply cannot afford to stay in the city. He actually dies before the film is completed.
From whatever standpoint you come from, this movie is very tough to watch. It makes you remember those that we have personally lost to the epidemic and how we would have so loved them to have survived too. It also brings you up sharply to know that these eight men represent a whole generation that are now having to come to grips with the fact the virus didn’t kill them as 50% of those with HIV/AIDS in the US are now (mainly men) over 50 years of age.
The documentary written, produced and directed by Erin Brethauer and Tim Hussin does its best to end on a positive note at a Dance that has been mounted for the long-time AIDS survivor community (there are some 6000 in SF) and for one brief moment they forget their worries and just go with the music. It gives them, and us, some hope.
Klaus Mann, son of Thomas Mann, author of Mephisto, was one of the first in Germany to write gay novels and plays. Not since reading Judith Thurman’s excellent biography of Colette some years back, have I been so captivated by a piece of writing and scholarship and the creative life and historical period it captures. The reverberations with our own contemporary times are uncanny and raise provocative questions about the role of the queer artist in society, especially a society faced with the lure of fascism and anti-liberal conservatism.
Klaus was an early foe of Nazism, writing against the wave of nationalism, xenophobia and racism that was sweeping across his beloved Germany. While his father Thomas and writers such as Alfred Döblin and Stefan Zweig vacillated in truly denouncing Hitler early on, Klaus felt compelled to leave Germany and to undertake establishing the anti-Nazi journal, “Die Sammlung” (“The Collection”).
As a result, Klaus was blacklisted and denounced as “a dangerous half-Jew,” his books were burned around Germany and his German citizenship was revoked. Thus began a life of amazing courage, tragedy and struggle. As a homosexual and a drug addict who suffered from paralyzing bouts of depression and insecurities fostered by the formidable shadow of his famous but aloof and critical father, Klaus became a driven, prolific writer of novels, plays, essays as well as an excellent journalist and public speaker. Moving to the U.S. with his father and their large family, Klaus taught himself English and adopted English as his primary written language. Like his dear sister Erika, Klaus denounced the German people for embracing Nazism and destroying as well as polluting the literary traditions of German literature. After the War he remained incredulous that anti-Nazification was largely ignored and supporters of Hitler were allowed to resume their professional roles in Germany.
A case in point was Gustaf Gründgens, the famous stage actor whom Klaus had an affair with prior to the War. Gründgens, a homosexual, remained in Germany and embraced Hitler and supported the regime. Göring saw him perform in Goethe’s “Faust, Part 1” as Mephistopheles and was so moved that he forgave the actor his earlier communist indiscretions as well as his homosexuality. In return Gründgens was appointed head of the Berlin State Theater. To keep up appearances the actor was forced to marry the actress Marianne Hoppe. While Klaus suffered as an émigré in anonymity, forgotten and despised, Grüngens’ career thrived even after the War with no repercussions.
Grüngens became the model for Hendrik Höfgen, Klaus’s main character in his most celebrated novel, Mephisto. The story is about an actor who must make the choice between political and moral integrity and political and professional opportunism during the Third Reich. In fact, it was the threat of retaliation by Gründgens after the War that delayed publication of the novel until 1981, well after Klaus’s death (even though it was first published in 1936 in Amsterdam but banned in Germany).
Wrongly accused of being a communist, turned down by publishers who in the isolationist days of America were not interested in the plight of Europeans, despised by Germans for having become an émigré and refusing to remain silent, and perpetually broke, Klaus struggled on. His sexual relations were erratic and unsatisfying for most of his life, although he longed for a long-term relationship. Fame as a writer was elusive. Poor timing and ill luck were a good part of his destiny.
Finally in 1949 in Cannes he was found dead in his room at the age of forty-two, ruled a suicide, although a thorough investigation was never undertaken. Here Spotts makes a compelling case to show the many reasons why suicide was probably not the case and that death was most likely caused by accidental poisoning with sleeping tablets (interacting with other drugs already in his system resulting in unintended toxic effects). To the end, Klaus was engaged in plans for a new book project and despite being in sizeable debt appeared ready for life’s ongoing battles.
In retrospect, Klaus Mann was a queer hero of the twentieth century to be admired, a gay man who acted upon his convictions, endured continual disappointment and only achieved the fame he so greatly desired after his death. Drawing freely from Klaus’s daily journal, Spotts gives us the internal psychological and intellectual trajectory of a troubled genius.
Prescient to the rise of Nazism and its dangers, Klaus was the first writer to sound the alarm and contemplate the unthinkable. While others laughed at Hitler and dismissed his early triumphs in 1932 with provincial elections, Klaus was quick to pronounce the results a “horrifying victory of lunacy.” When others accepted the claim “that democracy was ineffective and only dictatorship ‘gets things done,’” and that Hitler’s movement was “a perhaps imprudent but fundamentally sound and acceptable revolt against the ineffectiveness of ‘high politics,’” Klaus countered in a letter by stating: “As for myself I want to have nothing, nothing at all to do with this perverse kind of ‘radicalism.’ I cannot help preferring the slowness and uncertainty of the democratic process to the devastating swiftness of those dashing ‘counter-revolutionaries.’”
Klaus felt that passive acceptance of the “illusions of fascism would lead to ‘a new war and the downfall of European civilization.’” He refused to accept that Nazism represented a respectable “conservative revolution.”
No one could believe that Hitler would come to power “—a case of what Freud called ‘knowing and not knowing.’” Klaus Mann felt that the “German people [were] basically very intelligent” and would reject Hitler. His confidence was dashed in 1933 when Hitler became chancellor. He fled to Paris and revealed that “the essential reason for exile,” “. . .was that we were forced away by our own disgust, our horror and our forebodings.” Would that we could all draw our own lessons from this artist’s tragic life and act on our convictions in times of political turmoil.
Cursed Legacy: The Tragic Life of Klaus Mann
By Frederic Spotts
Yale University Press
Hardcover, 9780300218008, 352 pp.
April 2016
– See more at: http://www.lambdaliterary.org/reviews/06/12/cursed-legacy-the-tragic-life-of-klaus-mann-by-frederic-spotts/#sthash.BAt7cBnF.dpuf
It seems very apt that this highly emotional documentary that tells the poignant stories of 8 gay men who are long-time AIDS survivors is the work of The South Francisco Chronicle as it is Northern California’s largest newspaper and as such was always reporting more than most from the front line of the pandemic. Since 1981 when the first death was recorded in the city, some 20000 people in the City, mostly gay men, have died from AIDS. The film, the first one that the paper has ever produced, is part of a larger special report featuring interactive digital and print features by Chronicle reporter Erin Allday.
When these eight men were diagnosed back in the 1980’s all the medical advice they were given was ‘prepare to die very soon’, but they didn’t, and instead they had to sit by helplessly as their lovers and all their friends faced excruciating deaths instead. “By the time they died they were ready to let go, but I was never ready to let them go” said one very plaintively. They were all unprepared to survive the fierce regime of drugs that has left its marks …..one has neuropathy as a result. Now friendless and alone and approaching senior citizenship but without any of the usual savings or nest eggs, and with their disability allowances about to be drastically cut, they face major financial problems too.
Two of the men are partnered again, but for the most part what comes over in this very compelling film, is the overwhelming feeling of sadness from them. The tagline of the film sums it up beautifully “They had the remarkable luck to survive AIDS, and the brutal misfortune to live on.” One of men professes that there is not been one single day in the past three decades that he has not thought of suicide. Another is struggling to come to terms that he has been evicted from his home of 30 years on Castro and now he has to move to a trailer in Palm Springs as he simply cannot afford to stay in the city. He actually dies before the film is completed.
From whatever standpoint you come from, this movie is very tough to watch. It makes you remember those that we have personally lost to the epidemic and how we would have so loved them to have survived too. It also brings you up sharply to know that these eight men represent a whole generation that are now having to come to grips with the fact the virus didn’t kill them as 50% of those with HIV/AIDS in the US are now (mainly men) over 50 years of age.
The documentary written, produced and directed by Erin Brethauer and Tim Hussin does its best to end on a positive note at a Dance that has been mounted for the long-time AIDS survivor community (there are some 6000 in SF) and for one brief moment they forget their worries and just go with the music. It gives them, and us, some hope.